18 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Ρ ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Π°Ρ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² Π³ΡΠΈΠΏΠΏΠ° Π»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ°Ρ Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ ΠΎΡ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
An analysis of the main advantages and shortcomings of the existing inactivated and live vaccines against the equine influenza viruses is given in this paper. For the first time, the most important information, concerning the development of a new live modified cold-adapted equine influenza virus vaccine based on the A/HK/Otar/6:2/2010 strain is summarized. We discuss a number of unique features of the developed vaccine that have not previously been reported, and compare the new vaccine with the existing equine influenza vaccines. The properties of developed equine vaccine include: long lasting (12 months or more) protective immunity after a single immunization; sterile immunity after double vaccination; cross-protection against the heterologous virus in 12 months after a double vaccination and the differentiation of infected animals from vaccinated animals.Π Π½Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ΅ Π΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ· ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ² ΠΈ Π½Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΡ
Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² Π³ΡΠΈΠΏΠΏΠ° Π»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π½Ρ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² Π³ΡΠΈΠΏΠΏΠ° Π»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΡΡΠ°ΠΌΠΌΠ° Π/HK/ Otar/6:2/2010. ΠΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΡΡΠ΄ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ² ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Ρ, ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π΅ Π½Π΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΠ±ΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡΡ, Π² ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² Π³ΡΠΈΠΏΠΏΠ° Π»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Π΅ΠΉ. Π ΡΠΈΡΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ±Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ²ΠΎΠΉΡΡΠ² Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡ: ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ (Π½Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 12 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π²) ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ; ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π΄Π²ΡΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ; ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ½Π°Ρ Π·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΎΡ Π³Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π· 12 ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ΅Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π΄Π²ΡΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ; Π΄ΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡ Π²Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Operationalizing Cooperative Research for Infectious Disease Surveillance: Lessons Learned and Ways Forward.
The current COVID-19 pandemic demonstrates the need for urgent and on-demand solutions to provide diagnostics, treatment and preventative measures for infectious disease outbreaks. Once solutions are developed, meeting capacities depends on the ability to mitigate technical, logistical and production issues. While it is difficult to predict the next outbreak, augmenting investments in preparedness, such as infectious disease surveillance, is far more effective than mustering last-minute response funds. Bringing research outputs into practice sooner rather than later is part of an agile approach to pivot and deliver solutions. Cooperative multi- country research programs, especially those funded by global biosecurity programs, develop capacity that can be applied to infectious disease surveillance and research that enhances detection, identification, and response to emerging and re-emerging pathogens with epidemic or pandemic potential. Moreover, these programs enhance trust building among partners, which is essential because setting expectation and commitment are required for successful research and training. Measuring research outputs, evaluating outcomes and justifying continual investments are essential but not straightforward. Lessons learned include those related to reducing biological threats and maturing capabilities for national laboratory diagnostics strategy and related health systems. Challenges, such as growing networks, promoting scientific transparency, data and material sharing, sustaining funds and developing research strategies remain to be fully resolved. Here, experiences from several programs highlight successful partnerships that provide ways forward to address the next outbreak
Cooperative Research and Infectious Disease Surveillance: A 2021 Epilogue.
As the world looks forward to turning a corner in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, it becomes increasingly evident that international research cooperation and dialogue is necessary to end this global catastrophe. Last year, we initiated a research topic: "Infectious Disease Surveillance: Cooperative Research in Response to Recent Outbreaks, Including COVID-19," which aimed at featuring manuscripts focused on the essential link between surveillance and cooperative research for emerging and endemic diseases, and highlighting scientific partnerships in countries under-represented in the scientific literature. Here we recognize the body of work published from our manuscript call that resulted in over 50 published papers. This current analysis describes articles and authors from a variety of funded and unfunded international sources. The work exemplifies successful research and publications which are frequently cooperative, and may serve as a basis to model further global scientific engagements
Building Scientific Capability and Reducing Biological Threats: The Effect of Three Cooperative Bio-Research Programs in Kazakhstan.
Cooperative research programs aimed at reducing biological threats have increased scientific capabilities and capacities in Kazakhstan. The German Federal Foreign Office's German Biosecurity Programme, the United Kingdom's International Biological Security Programme and the United States Defense Threat Reduction Agency's Biological Threat Reduction Program provide funding for partner countries, like Kazakhstan. The mutual goals of the programs are to reduce biological threats and enhance global health security. Our investigation examined these cooperative research programs, summarizing major impacts they have made, as well as common successes and challenges. By mapping various projects across the three programs, research networks are highlighted which demonstrate best communication practices to share results and reinforce conclusions. Our team performed a survey to collect results from Kazakhstani partner scientists on their experiences that help gain insights into enhancing day-to-day approaches to conducting cooperative scientific research. This analysis will serve as a basis for a capability maturity model as used in industry, and in addition builds synergy for future collaborations that will be essential for quality and sustainment
Not Available
Not AvailableWe delineated the expression of DAP12 (DNAX-Activating Protein) and its associated receptors, TREM-1, TREM-2 and MDL-1 in pig alveolar monocyte/macrophages (AMM) that have attained M1 or M2 phenotypes. Pig AMM stimulated in vitro with IFN-Ξ³ and IL-4 induced the expression of M1 (TNFΞ± and iNOS) and M2 (ARG1 and no MMR) phenotypic markers, respectively. In influenza virus infected pigs at seven days post-infection, in addition to substantial modulations in the M1 and M2 markers expression, DAP12, TREM-1 and MDL-1 were downregulated in AMM. Thus, DAP12 signaling promoted the anti-inflammatory pathway in AMM of influenza virus infected pigs.Not Availabl