23 research outputs found
Ravulizumab in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome: An Analysis of Two-Year Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Two Phase 3 Trials
Rationale & Objective: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare form of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) caused by complement dysregulation. Ravulizumab is a complement C5 inhibitor (C5i) approved for the treatment of aHUS. This analysis assessed long-term outcomes of ravulizumab in adults and pediatric patients with aHUS. Study Design: This analysis reports 2-year data from two phase 3, single-arm studies. Setting & Participants: One study included C5i-naive adults (NCT02949128) and the other included two cohorts of pediatric patients (C5i-naive and those who switched to ravulizumab from eculizumab [pediatric switch patients]; NCT03131219). Exposure(s): Patients received intravenous ravulizumab every 4–8 weeks, with the dose depending on body weight. Outcomes: The primary endpoint in the studies of C5i-naive patients was complete TMA response, which consisted of platelet count normalization, lactate dehydrogenase normalization, and ≥25% improvement in serum creatinine from baseline, at two consecutive assessments at least 4 weeks apart. Analytical Approach: All analyses used descriptive statistics. No formal statistical comparisons were performed. Results: In total, 86 and 92 patients were included in efficacy and safety analyses, respectively. Complete TMA response rates over 2 years were 61% and 90% in C5i-naive adults and pediatric patients, respectively. The median increase in eGFR from baseline was maintained over 2 years in C5i-naive adults (35 mL/min/1.73m2 ) and pediatric patients (82.5 mL/min/1.73m2 ). Most adverse events and serious adverse events occurred during the first 26 weeks. No meningococcal infections were reported. Improvement in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue score achieved by 26 weeks was maintained over 2 years. Journal Pre-proof 3 Limitations: Limitations were the small sample of pediatric switch patients and limited availability of genetic data. Conclusions: Long-term treatment with ravulizumab is well tolerated and associated with improved hematological and renal parameters and quality of life in adults and pediatric patients with aHUS
Chronotype is associated with the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in toddlers
Chronotype is a construct reflecting individual differences in diurnal preference. Although chronotype has been studied extensively in school-age children, adolescents and adults, data on young children are scarce. This study describes chronotype and its relationship to the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in 48 healthy children aged 30-36 months (33.4 ± 2.1 months; 24 males). Parents completed the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ) ~2 weeks before the start of the study. The CCTQ provides three measures of chronotype: midsleep time on free days, a multi-item morningness/eveningness score and a single item chronotype score. After 5 days of sleeping on their habitual schedule (assessed with actigraphy and sleep diaries), children participated in an in-home salivary dim light melatonin onset assessment. Average midsleep time on free days was 1:47 ± 0:35, and the average morningness/eveningness score was 26.8 ± 4.3. Most toddlers (58.4%) were rated as 'definitely a morning type' or 'rather morning than evening type', while none (0%) were rated as 'definitely evening type'. More morning types (midsleep time on free days and morningness/eveningness score, respectively) had earlier melatonin onset times (r = 0.45, r = 0.26), earlier habitual bedtimes (r = 0.78, r = 0.54), sleep onset times (r = 0.80, r = 0.52), sleep midpoint times (r = 0.90, r = 0.53) and wake times (r = 0.74, r = 0.34). Parent ratings using the single-item chronotype score were associated with melatonin onset (r = 0.32) and habitual bedtimes (r = 0.27), sleep onset times (r = 0.33) and sleep midpoint times (r = 0.27). Morningness may best characterize circadian preference in early childhood. Associations between chronotype and circadian physiology and sleep timing suggest adequate validity for the CCTQ in this age group. These findings have important implications for understanding the marked variability in sleep timing during the early years of life
Chronotype is associated with the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in toddlers
Chronotype is a construct reflecting individual differences in diurnal preference. Although chronotype has been studied extensively in school-age children, adolescents and adults, data on young children are scarce. This study describes chronotype and its relationship to the timing of the circadian clock and sleep in 48 healthy children aged 30-36 months (33.4 ± 2.1 months; 24 males). Parents completed the Children's Chronotype Questionnaire (CCTQ) ~2 weeks before the start of the study. The CCTQ provides three measures of chronotype: midsleep time on free days, a multi-item morningness/eveningness score and a single item chronotype score. After 5 days of sleeping on their habitual schedule (assessed with actigraphy and sleep diaries), children participated in an in-home salivary dim light melatonin onset assessment. Average midsleep time on free days was 1:47 ± 0:35, and the average morningness/eveningness score was 26.8 ± 4.3. Most toddlers (58.4%) were rated as 'definitely a morning type' or 'rather morning than evening type', while none (0%) were rated as 'definitely evening type'. More morning types (midsleep time on free days and morningness/eveningness score, respectively) had earlier melatonin onset times (r = 0.45, r = 0.26), earlier habitual bedtimes (r = 0.78, r = 0.54), sleep onset times (r = 0.80, r = 0.52), sleep midpoint times (r = 0.90, r = 0.53) and wake times (r = 0.74, r = 0.34). Parent ratings using the single-item chronotype score were associated with melatonin onset (r = 0.32) and habitual bedtimes (r = 0.27), sleep onset times (r = 0.33) and sleep midpoint times (r = 0.27). Morningness may best characterize circadian preference in early childhood. Associations between chronotype and circadian physiology and sleep timing suggest adequate validity for the CCTQ in this age group. These findings have important implications for understanding the marked variability in sleep timing during the early years of life