The accuracy of the report of hepatic steatosis on ultrasonography in patients infected with hepatitis C in a clinical setting: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND: Steatosis is occasionally reported during screening ultrasonography in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). We conducted a retrospective observational study to assess the factors associated with steatosis on ultrasonography and the relationship between steatosis on ultrasound versus biopsy in patients infected with HCV in a clinical setting. Our hypothesis was ultrasonography would perform poorly for the detection of steatosis outside of the context of a controlled study, primarily due to false-positive results caused by hepatic fibrosis and inflammation. METHODS: A retrospective review of ultrasound reports was conducted on patients infected with HCV in a tertiary care gastroenterology clinic. Reports were reviewed for the specific documentation of the presence of steatosis. Baseline clinical and histologic parameters were recorded, and compared for patients with vs. without steatosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed on these baseline variables. Liver biopsies were reviewed by two pathologists, and graded for steatosis. Steatosis on biopsy was compared to steatosis on ultrasound report, and the performance characteristics of ultrasonography were calculated, using biopsy as the gold standard. RESULTS: Ultrasound reports were available on 164 patients. Patients with steatosis on ultrasound had a higher incidence of the following parameters compared to patients without steatosis: diabetes (12/49 [24%] vs. 7/115 [6%], p < 0.001), fibrosis stage >2 (15/48 [31%] vs. 16/110 [15%], p = 0.02), histologic grade >2 (19/48 [40%] vs. 17/103 [17%], p = 0.002), and ALT (129.5 ± 89.0 IU/L vs. 94.3 ± 87.0 IU/L, p = 0.01). Histologic grade was the only factor independently associated with steatosis with multivariate analysis. When compared to the histologic diagnosis of steatosis (n = 122), ultrasonography had a substantial number of false-positive and false-negative results. In patients with a normal ultrasound, 8/82 (10%) had >30% steatosis on biopsy. Among patients with steatosis reported on ultrasound, only 12/40 (30%) had >30% steatosis on biopsy review. CONCLUSION: Steatosis on ultrasound is associated with markers of inflammation and fibrosis in HCV-infected patients, but does not consistently correlate with steatosis on biopsy outside of the context of a controlled study. Clinicians should be skeptical of the definitive diagnosis of steatosis on hepatic ultrasonography

In patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and RVR 14 weeks treatment is noninferior to 24 weeks:pooled analysis of two Scandinavian trials

AIM: To compare 14 and 24 weeks treatment to patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and rapid virological response (RVR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients included in two Scandinavian trials, one nonrandomized pilot trial (n=122) and one randomized controlled trial (RCT) (n=428) were entered into a pooled database. In both trials treatment naïve patients with genotype 2 or 3 were treated with pegylated interferon alpha 2b (1.5 mug/kg, subcutaneous) weekly and ribavirin (800-1400 mg, orally) daily. Primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR). RVR was defined as HCV RNA less than 50 IU/ml after 4 weeks of treatment. In the pilot trial all patients with RVR were treated for 14 weeks and in the RCT patients with RVR were randomised to either 14 or 24 weeks treatment. Patients treated per protocol were included in the primary analysis. The noninferiority margin was set to be 10% between the two groups with a one-sided 5% significance level. RESULTS: In patients with RVR and genotype 2 or 3 SVR was obtained in 181 of 199 (91.0%) and 93 of 98 (94.9%) after 14 and 24 weeks treatment, respectively. The observed difference in SVR rates was 3.9% (90% confidence interval: +1 to -8.8). The relapse rate was highest among those older than 40 years and those with genotype 3 and high viral load, but prolongation of treatment from 14 to 24 weeks did not reduce the relapse rate substantially in any of these groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 infection and RVR 14 weeks treatment is noninferior to 24 weeks