Changes in surface roughness and color stability of two composites caused by different bleaching agents

Made available in DSpace on 2019-09-12T16:25:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2012O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o efeito de dois agentes clareadores (peróxido de hidrogênio a 10% e 35%) sobre a estabilidade de cor e rugosidade superficial de dois compósitos, um nanohíbrido e um nanoparticulado. Os espécimes foram polidos, envelhecidos, manchados, clareados e polidos novamente. A ação dos agentes clareadores sobre os compósitos foi analisada em perfilômetro (rugosidade) e um espectrofotômetro (estabilidade de cor). A ação de polimento dos compósitos sobre a rugosidade superficial e a retomada da cor dos compósitos também foi avaliada. Os resultados foram analisados estatisticamente por ANOVA e teste de Tukey (5% de significância). A análise indicou que o compósito nanohíbrido foi mais afetado pelo manchamento. Os agentes clareadores não foram capazes de promover o clareamento dos compósitos ao longo do período de avaliação. O polimento da superfície retornou o compósito nanohíbrido à sua condição de cor original, o que não foi observado para o nanoparticulado. Além disso, o polimento não retornou a rugosidade de superfície dos compósitos para os valores originais. Os autores concluíram que o polimento da superfície após o clareamento não deve ser a opção de tratamento, uma vez que não foi possível inverter a rugosidade dos compósitos à sua rugosidade original, sugerindo que uma degradação mais extensa e irreversível pode ter ocorridoThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of two bleaching agents (10% and 35% hydrogen peroxide) on the color stability and surface roughness of two composites, one nanohybrid and one nanoparticle. Specimens were polished, aged, stained, bleached and polished again. The action of the bleaching agents on the composites was analyzed using a profilometer (surface roughness) and a spectrophotometer (color stability). The effect of polishing the composites on the surface roughness and the resumption of the composite color was also evaluated. The results were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level. The analysis indicated that the nanohybrid composite was more affected by staining. The bleaching agents were not able to promote bleaching of either composite over the evaluation period. Surface polishing returned nanohybrid composite to its original color condition, which did not occur for the nanoparticle composite. Additionally, polishing did not return the surface roughness of either composite to its original value. It may be concluded that polishing surface after bleaching should not be the treatment of choice, as it was not possible to reverse the roughness of the composites to their original values, suggesting that a more extensive and irreversible degradation might have occurred.[Barceleiro, Marcos de Oliveira] Universidade Federal Fluminense, BrazilReis, Rodrigo Sant'anna Aguiar dos] Universidade do Grande Rio, BrazilMendes, Anna Paula Kalix França; Dias, Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes] Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, BrazilBonato, Lucilei Lopes] Universidade de Taubaté, Brazi

Stress distribution in the cervical region of an upper central incisor in a 3D finite element model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the stress distribution in the cervical region of a sound upper central incisor in two clinical situations, standard and maximum masticatory forces, by means of a 3D model with the highest possible level of fidelity to the anatomic dimensions. Two models with 331,887 linear tetrahedral elements that represent a sound upper central incisor with periodontal ligament, cortical and trabecular bones were loaded at 45º in relation to the tooth's long axis. All structures were considered to be homogeneous and isotropic, with the exception of the enamel (anisotropic). A standard masticatory force (100 N) was simulated on one of the models, while on the other one a maximum masticatory force was simulated (235.9 N). The software used were: PATRAN for pre- and post-processing and Nastran for processing. In the cementoenamel junction area, tensile forces reached 14.7 MPa in the 100 N model, and 40.2 MPa in the 235.9 N model, exceeding the enamel's tensile strength (16.7 MPa). The fact that the stress concentration in the amelodentinal junction exceeded the enamel's tensile strength under simulated conditions of maximum masticatory force suggests the possibility of the occurrence of non-carious cervical lesions such as abfractions