Does prior coronary angioplasty affect outcomes of surgical coronary revascularization? Insights from the STICH trial

Background: The STICH trial showed superiority of coronary artery bypass plus medical treatment (CABG) over medical treatment alone (MED) in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. In previous publications, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to CABG was associated with worse prognosis. Objectives: The main purpose of this study was to analyse if prior PCI influenced outcomes in STICH. Methods and results: Patients in the STICH trial (n = 1212), followed for a median time of 9.8 years, were included in the present analyses. In the total population, 156 had a prior PCI (74 and 82, respectively, in the MED and CABG groups). In those with vs. without prior PCI, the adjusted hazard-ratios (aHRs) were 0.92 (95% CI = 0.74–1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.85 (95% CI = 0.64–1.11) for CV mortality, and 1.43 (95% CI = 1.15–1.77) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG without prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.82 (95% CI = 0.70–0.95) for all-cause mortality, 0.75 (95% CI = 0.62–0.90) for CV mortality and 0.67 (95% CI = 0.56–0.80) for CV hospitalization. In the group randomized to CABG with prior PCI, the aHRs were 0.76 (95% CI = 0.50–1.15) for all-cause mortality, 0.81 (95% CI = 0.49–1.36) for CV mortality and 0.61 (95% CI = 0.41–0.90) for CV hospitalization. There was no evidence of interaction between randomized treatment and prior PCI for any endpoint (all adjusted p > 0.05). Conclusion: In the STICH trial, prior PCI did not affect the outcomes of patients whether they were treated medically or surgically, and the superiority of CABG over MED remained unchanged regardless of prior PCI. Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT0002359

A Cross-sectional study to look at the determinants of poor adherence to secondary penicillin prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease at a tertiary care center in South India

Background: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) continues to create havoc in the developing countries even decades after its discovery. It is entirely preventable through primordial, primary, and secondary level intervention. Secondary prevention is a reasonable treatment option in patients in India, but it suffers due to poor adherence which remains the main impediment to its implementation. The aim is to study the compliance with benzathine penicillin as secondary prophylaxis in RHD patients and to establish the patient-related factors for adherence and reasons for missing of doses. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of RHD patients presenting to our institute. The demographic data, clinical history, and details of penicillin prophylaxis were noted. The patient was labeled as compliant or noncompliant depending on frequency and duration of prophylaxis as prescribed. Potential factors between the two groups have been analyzed by univariate and binary logistic regression. Results: The study cohort of 500 patients consisted of 261 compliant and 239 noncompliant patients. Average age of presentation was 29 ± 13 years with females outnumbering the males. Noncompliance with secondary prophylaxis was more prevalent among male (P = 0.003), low socioeconomic class (P = 0.0009), uneducated (P = 0.000018), and the rural population (P = 0.025) while those with previous history of rheumatic fever (RF) were found to be more compliant (P = 0.04). Recurrences of RF were more common in those not on regular prophylaxis (P = 0.011). The most common reason cited for noncompliance was the absence of proper counseling followed by a sense of well-being, injection site pain and financial constraints. Conclusion: Compliance with secondary penicillin prophylaxis is essential to ensure eradication of RHD. Education about the importance and necessity of prophylaxis would improve compliance. A close patient and health personnel relationship is important in improving adherence to secondary prophylaxis

Comparison of Invasive vs Noninvasive Pulse Wave Indices in Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Disease: Can We Use Noninvasive Pulse Wave Indices as Screening Test

Various non-invasive techniques to assess the indices of arterial stiffness, such as augmentation Index were used previously to detect coronary artery disease (CAD). We studied two indices of arterial stiffness analyzed from pulse contour analysis—reflection (RI) and stiffness index (SI) both by noninvasively using plethesmography and invasively from radial artery along with ECG to detect CAD and its severity. 56 patients with a mean age of 52.62 ∓ 8.3 yrs undergoing coronary angiogram transradially either for the diagnosis or exclusion of CAD participated in this study. Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) is defined as greater than 50% stenosis in at least one epicardial coronary artery (ECA). Scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 was given for normal (no CAD group), significant CAD in one ECA, two ECA and all three ECA respectively. 17 patients had normal ECA, 15 patients had score 1, 13 patients had score 2, and 11 patients had score 3. By noninvasive method, the mean value of RI for no-CAD group was 37.82% ∓ 7.3% vs CAD group 73.09% ∓ 10.09% (p 0.05) or SI (p > 0.05). By invasive method RI (p = 0.0056) and SI (p = 0.0068) showed statistically significant correlation in detection of CAD but not for the severity. In conclusion, reflection and stiffness index have a significant difference in patients with CAD and CAD patients receiving medication. However, the difference between these parameters in varying grades of CAD is not significant

Coronary Physiologic Assessment Based on Angiography and Intracoronary Imaging

Intracoronary physiology testing has evolved as a promising diagnostic approach in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. The value of hyperemic translesional pressure ratios to estimate the functional relevance of coronary stenoses is supported by a wealth of outcomes data. The continuing drive to further simplify this approach led to the development of non-hyperemic pressure-based indices. Recent attention has focused on estimating functional significance without invasively measuring coronary pressure through the measurement of virtual indices derived from the coronary angiogram. By offering a routine assessment of the physiology of all the major epicardial coronary vessels, angiogram-derived physiology has the potential to modify current practice by facilitating more accurate patient-level, vessel-level, and even lesion-level decision making. This article reviews the current state of angiogram-derived physiology and speculates on its potential impact on clinical practice, in continuation to the previously published article on coronary physiology in this journal