Radiation therapists' perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania: A qualitative study.

IntroductionA thermoplastic mask is the most widely used immobilization device for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. The radiation therapist is the staff responsible to prepare these masks and set-up the patients for treatment, a procedure that requires time, patience, and precision. An understanding of Radiation therapists' perceptions regarding thermoplastic mask use will help design interventions to address challenges encountered in its use. This study explored Radiation therapists' perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania.Material and methodsAn exploratory qualitative study design was used to explore thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, involving fifteen Radiation therapists from Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania between March and May 2021. A thematic analysis method was used to identify themes from data scripts.ResultsFour themes emerged that reflected radiation therapists' perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer immobilization among patients undergoing radiotherapy. Emerged themes were (1) Perceived benefits and limitations of thermoplastic mask use, (2) Refresher training and supervision requirements for effective use, (3) Proper storage for quality maintenance, and (4) Increased financial support and proper budgeting.ConclusionParticipants perceived better patient immobilization with a thermoplastic mask use. However, too often recycling of thermoplastic masks and the long waiting time between thermoplastic mask preparation and treatment delivery limits their effective use. For efficient use of thermoplastic masks, there is a need for Radiation therapists' refresher training and proper supervision, improving the storage system and increasing financial support for procuring new thermoplastic masks

Radiation therapists’ perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania: A qualitative study

Introduction A thermoplastic mask is the most widely used immobilization device for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. The radiation therapist is the staff responsible to prepare these masks and set-up the patients for treatment, a procedure that requires time, patience, and precision. An understanding of Radiation therapists’ perceptions regarding thermoplastic mask use will help design interventions to address challenges encountered in its use. This study explored Radiation therapists’ perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy at Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania. Material and methods An exploratory qualitative study design was used to explore thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted, involving fifteen Radiation therapists from Ocean Road Cancer Institute in Tanzania between March and May 2021. A thematic analysis method was used to identify themes from data scripts. Results Four themes emerged that reflected radiation therapists’ perceptions of thermoplastic mask use for head and neck cancer immobilization among patients undergoing radiotherapy. Emerged themes were (1) Perceived benefits and limitations of thermoplastic mask use, (2) Refresher training and supervision requirements for effective use, (3) Proper storage for quality maintenance, and (4) Increased financial support and proper budgeting. Conclusion Participants perceived better patient immobilization with a thermoplastic mask use. However, too often recycling of thermoplastic masks and the long waiting time between thermoplastic mask preparation and treatment delivery limits their effective use. For efficient use of thermoplastic masks, there is a need for Radiation therapists’ refresher training and proper supervision, improving the storage system and increasing financial support for procuring new thermoplastic masks

Performance of an offline systematic error correction strategy in pediatric patients receiving adjuvant conformal radiotherapy for Wilm's tumor.

BackgroundRadiotherapy plays a key role as an adjuvant treatment in pediatric Wilm's tumor, improving both survival and quality of life. The success of radiotherapy depends on the precise delivery of radiation dose to the tumor while sparing radiosensitive structures in the vicinity of the tumor. Pediatric patients pose unique challenges in achieving accurate radiotherapy delivery due to their inability to understand instructions and the high radiosensitivity of their tissues. Thus, it is important to determine the optimum geometric verification strategy that will ensure accurate delivery of the prescribed target as specified in the patient's treatment plan.PurposeTo evaluate the performance of an offline geometric correction strategy in ensuring accuracy and reproducibility during radiotherapy delivery in Wilm's tumor patients.Material and methodsThe extended no-action level offline correction strategy was applied in the radiotherapy delivery of 45 Wilm's tumor patients. Gross errors from the first three fractions were used to calculate the mean errors which were then applied as offline correction factors. Mean errors among different groups were compared using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Dunnett's pairwise comparisons. All statistical analyses and data visualization were performed using GraphPad Prism version 7 (Insight Partners, GraphPad Holdings, LLC).ResultsA total of 45 patients were included in the study. In all three orthogonal directions, the recorded gross errors were significantly lower after the application of the systematic error corrections. Random errors were significantly larger in the longitudinal direction compared to lateral (mean difference = 0.28, p = 0.036) and vertical directions (mean difference = 0.37 cm, p = 0.003). Patients' age was a significant predictor of random errors whereby the magnitude of random error decreased with increasing age.ConclusionThis study shows that the offline correction strategy used is effective in ensuring the accuracy of radiotherapy delivery in pediatric Wilm's tumor patients

Challenges and opportunities for implementing hypofractionated radiotherapy in Africa: lessons from the HypoAfrica clinical trial

The rising cancer incidence and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) warrants an increased focus on adopting or developing approaches that can significantly increase access to treatment in the region. One such approach recommended by the recent Lancet Oncology Commission for sub-Saharan Africa is hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), which can substantially increase access to radiotherapy by reducing the overall duration of time (in days) each person spends being treated. Here we highlight challenges in adopting such an approach identified during the implementation of the HypoAfrica clinical trial. The HypoAfrica clinical trial is a longitudinal, multicentre study exploring the feasibility of applying HFRT for prostate cancer in SSA. This study has presented an opportunity for a pragmatic assessment of potential barriers and facilitators to adopting HFRT. Our results highlight three key challenges: quality assurance, study harmonisation and machine maintenance. We describe solutions employed to resolve these challenges and opportunities for longer term solutions that can facilitate scaling-up use of HFRT in SSA in clinical care and multicentre clinical trials. This report provides a valuable reference for the utilisation of radiotherapy approaches that increase access to treatment and the conduct of high-quality large-scale/multi-centre clinical trials involving radiotherapy