Developing health-related quality-of-life instruments for use in Asia: the issues.

About half of the world's population live in Asia. Mandarin (the official language of China), Hindi and Japanese are among the ten languages spoken by the largest number of primary speakers. The numbers of Tamil and Malay speakers are expected to grow rapidly in the next few decades. Most health-related quality-of-life (HR-QOL) instruments currently used in Asia are translations and/or adaptations of instruments developed in North America and Western Europe. We illustrate and discuss several major issues in the development of HR-QOL instruments for use in Asia. We have seen insufficient quality in translation and semantic equivalence, which is not a uniquely Asian problem. This problem will be alleviated by putting recently proposed guidelines for translation and adaptation of patient-reported outcomes into practice and formally conducting equivalence studies. For copyright or other reasons it is rare to see major adaptations, such as exclusion of a domain in the original instrument or inclusion of a new domain, made to existing instruments. Evidence is limited and mixed as to whether there are differences in the concepts of HR-QOL between Asian and North American/Western European cultures that are important enough to justify such major adaptations, or the development of indigenous instruments, as opposed to the translation/adaptation of existing instruments. There are substantial cultural differences concerning what questions are appropriate to ask and answer. Many HR-QOL instruments are designed for self-completion. This mode of administration is often not feasible in Asia because of low literacy rates and the presence of many different regional languages. Alternative administration methods and analytic strategies that allow for pooling data collected by different modes are needed. The availability of HR-QOL instruments in various Asian countries seems to reflect the status of economic development of the countries rather than their disease burden. For instance, many important HR-QOL instruments are available in Japanese but not in Hindi or Tamil

Order effects: a randomised study of three major cancer-specific quality of life instruments

BACKGROUND: In methodological studies and outcomes research, questionnaires often comprise several health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures. Previous psychological studies have suggested that changing the sequential order of measurement scales within a questionnaire could alter the pattern of responses. Yet, information on the presence or absence of order effects on the assessment of HRQoL in cancer patients is limited. METHODS: An incomplete block design was used in this study of 1277 cancer patients. Each patient filled out a questionnaire package that contained two of the three major cancer-specific HRQoL instruments, namely the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General, the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire and the Functional Living Index – Cancer. Within a questionnaire package the sequential order of the instruments contained were randomised. Measurement properties of the instruments, including the number of missing values, mean HRQoL scores, known-groups validity and internal consistency were compared between samples of different presentation orders. RESULTS: No effect of presentation order on the four properties aforementioned was found. CONCLUSION: Presentation order is unlikely to alter the responses to these HRQoL instruments administered in cancer patients when any two of them are used together

Validation and interval scale transformation of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty, using the Rasch model

OBJECTIVES: Interval scale reduce measurement bias compared to ordinal scale. We aimed to evaluate the fit of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) to the Rasch model and derive the transformation table for interval scale measurement. METHODS: Data from osteoarthritis patients listed for knee arthroplasty (KA) pre-operatively, and at 6- and 12- months post-operative was used. WOMAC was calibrated for fit to the Rasch model for monotonicity, homogeneity, local item independence and absence of differential item functioning (DIF) in a randomly selected 900 patients, 300 from each time point; parameter estimates were then imported into the full data set. Responsiveness was reported through Standard Error of Measurement (SEM); Smallest Detectable Difference (SDD), %SDD and effect sizes (ES) between baseline and 6-months. WOMAC was transformed from ordinal to interval values. RESULTS: 1136 patients (mean age 65.9 years, 69.9% female) were included. WOMAC pain (0−20), function (0−68) and total scores (0−96) had adequate fit to Rasch model with good reliability (Person Separation Index: 0.76, 0.80 and 0.79). No item deletion was required. The SEM, SDD, %SDD and ES of WOMAC total were 4.4, 6.9, 10.1, and 1.97. No significant DIF was seen for age, sex, body mass index, type of KA, languages, and education level. WOMAC pain, function and total scores were transformed to interval scales. CONCLUSION: WOMAC total, pain and function scales had adequate fit to the Rasch model, providing unidimensional measure with good reliability and responsiveness. Transformation of WOMAC to interval scale measurement is applicable to other studies

The impact of diabetes mellitus and other chronic medical conditions on health-related Quality of Life: Is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important public health concern, the impact of which is increased by the high prevalence of co-existing chronic medical conditions among subjects with DM. The aims of this study were therefore to (1) evaluate the impact of DM and co-existing chronic medical conditions on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (which could be additive, synergistic or subtractive); (2) to determine the extent to which the SF-6D (a single-index preference measure) captures the multidimensional information provided by the SF-36 (a profile measure). METHODS: Using data from a cross-sectional, population-based survey of Chinese, Malay and Indians in Singapore, we developed 9 separate multiple linear regression models, with each SF-36 scale or SF-6D index score being the dependent variable for one model. The influence of DM and a second chronic medical condition (hypertension (HTN), heart disease (HD), musculoskeletal illnesses (MS)) and their interactions were studied after adjusting for the influence of potential confounding variables. RESULTS: Among 5,224 subjects, the prevalence of DM, HTN, HD and MS were 5.9%, 10.7%, 2.4% and 26.6% respectively. DM lowered SF-36 scores by more than 2 points on 3 SF-36 scales and lowered SF-6D scores by 0.03 points. Subjects with DM and HTN, DM and HD or DM and MS experienced further lowering of SF-36 scores exceeding 2 points on at least 6 scales and further lowering of SF-6D scores by 0.05, 0.08 and 0.10 points respectively. Generally, DM and co-existing medical conditions exerted additive effects on HRQoL, with the exception of DM and heart disease, where a subtractive effect was noted. SF-6D index scores generally reflected the patterns of influence of DM and chronic medical conditions on SF-36 scores. CONCLUSION: DM and chronic medical conditions generally reduced HRQoL in this multiethnic general population in an additive, rather than synergistic or subtractive fashion. In this study, the SF-6D was a reasonably good summary measure for the SF-36

Experiences of environmental services workers in a tertiary hospital in Asia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

BackgroundThe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a significant impact on all walks of life, in particular, environmental services workers in healthcare settings had higher workload, increased stress and greater susceptibility to COVID-19 infections during the pandemic. Despite extensive literature describing the impact of the pandemic on healthcare workers such as doctors and nurses, studies on the lived experiences of environmental services workers in healthcare settings are sparse and none has been conducted in the Asian context. This qualitative study thus aimed to examine the experiences of those who worked for a year of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsA purposive sample of environmental services workers was recruited from a major tertiary hospital in Singapore. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in-person, lasting around 30min, and included open-ended questions pertaining to five main domains: work experiences during COVID-19, training and education needs, resource and supplies availability, communication with management and other healthcare staff, and perceived stressors and support. These domains were identified based on team discussions and literature review. The interviews were recorded and transcribed for thematic analysis, as guided by Braun and Clarke.ResultsA total of 12 environmental services workers were interviewed. After the first seven interviews, no new themes emerged but an additional five interviews were done to ensure data saturation. The analysis yielded three main themes and nine subthemes, including (1) practical and health concerns, (2) coping and resilience, and (3) occupational adaptations during the pandemic. Many expressed confidence in the preventive efficacy of proper PPE, infection control practice and COVID-19 vaccination in protecting them against COVID-19 and severe illness. Having prior experience with infectious disease outbreaks and previous training in infection control and prevention appeared to be useful as well for these workers. Despite the various challenges presented by the pandemic, they could still find meaning in their everyday work by positively impacting the wellbeing of patients and other healthcare workers in the hospital.ConclusionBesides uncovering the concerns shared by these workers, we identified helpful coping strategies, resilience factors and certain occupational adaptations, which have implications for future pandemic planning and readiness

Cross-cultural measurement equivalence of the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Singapore

Background: This study aimed to assess the measurement equivalence of the 5-level EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L) among the English, Chinese, and Malay versions. Methods: A convenience sample of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were enrolled from a public primary health care institution in Singapore. The survey questionnaire comprised the EQ-5D-5L and questions assessing participants’ socio-demographic and clinical characteristics. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the difference in EQ-5D-5L index (calculated using an interim algorithm) and EQ-visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) scores across survey language (Chinese vs. English, Malay vs. English, and Malay vs. Chinese). Measurement equivalence was examined by comparing the 90 % confidence interval of difference in the EQ-5D-5L index and EQ-VAS scores with a pre-determined equivalence margin. Multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the response patterns of the 5 Likert-type items of the EQ-5D-5L across survey language. Results: Equivalence was demonstrated between the Chinese and English versions and between the Malay and English versions of the EQ-5D-5L index scores. Equivalence was also demonstrated between the Chinese and English versions and between the Malay and Chinese versions of the EQ-VAS scores. Equivalence could not be determined between the Malay and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D-5L index score and between the Malay and English versions of the EQ-VAS score. No significant difference was found in responses to EQ-5D-5L items between any languages, except that patients who chose to complete the Chinese version were more likely to report “no problems” in mobility compared to those who completed the Malay version of the questionnaire. Conclusions: This study provided evidence for the measurement equivalence of the different language versions of EQ-5D-5L in Singapore

An Exploratory Study of Response Shift in Health-Related Quality of Life and Utility Assessment Among Patients with Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Replacement Surgery in a Tertiary Hospital in Singapore

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate the influence of response shift (RS) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and utility assessment among patients undergoing total knee replacement.MethodsConsenting patients undergoing total knee replacement were interviewed to determine their HRQOL by using the six-dimensional health state short form, derived from SF-36, and the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire at baseline (pretest 1) and the six-dimensional health state short form, derived from SF-36, at 6 (pretest 2) and 18 months after surgery (post-test). RS was studied by using a “then-test” approach by contacting participants 18 months after surgery and asking them to evaluate their HRQOL at baseline (then-test 1) and at 6 (then-test 2) and 18 months after surgery. RS was calculated as the score difference between pretest and then-test scores for a given time point. Relationships between RS and external variables were explored by using univariate and multiple liner regression analyses.ResultsIn 74 subjects (63% response rate, median age 68 years), median (interquantile range) six-dimensional health state short form, derived from SF-36, scores for then-tests at baseline (0.48 [0.42–0.49]) and at 6 months (0.72 [0.66–0.79]) after surgery were significantly different from respective pretest scores (0.61 [0.58–0.68] at baseline, P = 0.000; 0.69 [0.63–0.72] at 6 months, P = 0.000), showing RS at both time points. RS at baseline (0.14 [0.08–0.20]) was significantly larger than that at 6 months (−0.05 [0.14 to 0.00], P = 0.000). EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire pretest and then-test scores at baseline also differed significantly (0.69 [0.17–0.73] vs. −0.18 [−0.23 to 0.00], P = 0.000). RS at baseline was not affected by assessed demographic or medical variables. RS at 6 months was greater in subjects with more years of education (16% of variance in multiple liner regression, P < 0.01).ConclusionRS was present and impacted HRQOL and utility assessment among patients undergoing total knee replacement before and 6 months after surgery

Do English and Chinese EQ-5D versions demonstrate measurement equivalence? an exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Although multiple language versions of health-related quality of life instruments are often used interchangeably in clinical research, the measurement equivalence of these versions (especially using alphabet vs pictogram-based languages) has rarely been assessed. We therefore investigated the measurement equivalence of English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D, a widely used utility-based outcome instrument. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, either EQ-5D version was administered to consecutive outpatients with rheumatic diseases. Measurement equivalence of EQ-5D item responses and utility and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS) scores between these versions was assessed using multiple regression models (with and without adjusting for potential confounding variables), by comparing the 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of score differences between these versions with pre-defined equivalence margins. An equivalence margin defined a magnitude of score differences (10% and 5% of entire score ranges for item responses and utility/EQ-VAS scores, respectively) which was felt to be clinically unimportant. RESULTS: Sixty-six subjects completed the English and 48 subjects the Chinese EQ-5D. The 95%CI of the score differences between these versions overlapped with but did not fall completely within pre-defined equivalence margins for 4 EQ-5D items, utility and EQ-VAS scores. For example, the 95%CI of the adjusted score difference between these EQ-5D versions was -0.14 to +0.03 points for utility scores and -11.6 to +3.3 points for EQ-VAS scores (equivalence margins of -0.05 to +0.05 and -5.0 to +5.0 respectively). CONCLUSION: These data provide promising evidence for the measurement equivalence of English and Chinese EQ-5D versions

Complementary and alternative medicine for rheumatic diseases: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

To summarize all good quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) interventions in patients with rheumatic diseases.A systematic literature review guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) was performed. We excluded non-English language articles and abstract-only publications. Due to the large number of RCTs identified, we only include "good quality" RCTs with Jadad score of five.We identified 60 good quality RCTs using CAM as intervention for patients with rheumatic diseases: acupuncture (9), Ayurvedic treatment (3), homeopathic treatment (3), electricity (2), natural products (31), megavitamin therapies (8), chiropractic or osteopathic manipulation (3), and energy healing therapy (1). The studies do not seem to suggest a particular type of CAM is effective for all types for rheumatic diseases. However, some CAM interventions appear to be more effective for certain types of rheumatic diseases. Acupuncture appears to be beneficial for osteoarthritis but not rheumatoid arthritis. For the other therapeutic modalities, the evidence base either contains too few trials or contains trials with contradictory findings which preclude any definitive summary. There were only minor adverse reactions observed for CAM interventions presented.We identified 60 good quality RCTs which were heterogenous in terms of interventions, disease, measures used to assess outcomes, and efficacy of CAM interventions. Evidence indicates that some CAM therapies may be useful for rheumatic diseases, such as acupuncture for osteoarthritis. Further research with larger sample size is required for more conclusive evidence regarding efficacy of CAM interventions