3 research outputs found
Dietary Niche Shifts of Multiple Marine Predators under Varying Prey Availability on the Northeast Newfoundland Coast
Understanding species interactions among top marine predators and interactions with their prey can provide important insight into community-level responses to changing prey availability and the role of apex predators as indicators of ecosystem change. On the northeast Newfoundland coast, marine predators rely on capelin (Mallotus villosus), a dominant forage fish, as a food source. Capelin migrate into coastal regions to spawn during July, essentially transforming the food supply from low during early summer (i.e., pre-spawning) to high later in the summer (i.e., spawning). During July-August, 2016, we used stable isotopic ratios of nitrogen (δ15N) and carbon (δ13C) to investigate shifts in dietary niche metrics at the predator group-level (trophic position, dietary niche breadth) and community-level (niche overlap, trophic diversity) for multiple marine predators under varying capelin availability. Predator groups included non-breeding shearwaters (great shearwater Ardenna gravis, sooty shearwater A. grisea), humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae), and gull chicks (herring gull Larus argentatus, great black-backed gull Larus marinus). We also tested the sensitivity of community-level dietary metrics to a variety of published trophic discrimination factors. Tissue samples from shearwaters (blood cellular component), gull chicks (whole blood), and whales (skin), representing average diets over 2–3 weeks, were collected during three periods (early, mid, late) corresponding to increasing capelin availability. Isotopic niche breadth (Standard Ellipse Area, SEAb) narrowed and trophic position shifted toward higher δ15N for all predator groups as capelin availability increased, suggesting a higher reliance on capelin. Trophic diversity (distance to centroid) decreased with increased capelin availability, while pairwise niche overlap between predator groups was highly variable and sensitive to trophic discrimination factors. Findings suggest that although capelin is the dominant forage fish during the summer, predators rely on capelin as prey to varying degrees. Combining species- and community-level metrics of dietary niche and trophic diversity may provide a more complete picture of predator responses to prey availability and, thus, may be important monitoring tools to indicate changes in the food supply of marine predators
Foraging range scales with colony size in high-latitude seabirds
International audienceDensity-dependent prey depletion around breeding colonies has long been considered an important factor controlling the population dynamics of colonial animals.1, 2, 3, 4 Ashmole proposed that as seabird colony size increases, intraspecific competition leads to declines in reproductive success, as breeding adults must spend more time and energy to find prey farther from the colony.¹ Seabird colony size often varies over several orders of magnitude within the same species and can include millions of individuals per colony.⁵,⁶ As such, colony size likely plays an important role in determining the individual behavior of its members and how the colony interacts with the surrounding environment.⁶ Using tracking data from murres (Uria spp.), the world’s most densely breeding seabirds, we show that the distribution of foraging-trip distances scales to colony size⁰.33 during the chick-rearing stage, consistent with Ashmole’s halo theory.¹,² This pattern occurred across colonies varying in size over three orders of magnitude and distributed throughout the North Atlantic region. The strong relationship between colony size and foraging range means that the foraging areas of some colonial species can be estimated from colony sizes, which is more practical to measure over a large geographic scale. Two-thirds of the North Atlantic murre population breed at the 16 largest colonies; by extrapolating the predicted foraging ranges to sites without tracking data, we show that only two of these large colonies have significant coverage as marine protected areas. Our results are an important example of how theoretical models, in this case, Ashmole’s version of central-place-foraging theory, can be applied to inform conservation and management in colonial breeding species