In Vitro Cytotoxicity Screening as a Criterion for the Rational Selection of Tear Substitutes

A large number of artificial tears are currently available in the pharmaceutical market. Selecting the right drug for the patient remains a challenge for both the doctor and the patient. Comparing the cytotoxicity of artificial tears is one of the criteria for the rational selection of a drug that promotes maximum clinical efficacy and a higher safety profile. It is known that cells grown in vitro retain many metabolic features of the parent host tissues and at the same time lack tissue and organ interrelations and regulatory effects of the nervous and endocrine systems and have very limited compensatory capabilities. These features of cell cultures provide an opportunity to investigate the interaction of chemical agents directly with the cell itself, to identify changes in cellular and subcellular structures that can be masked in whole-organism settings. This study presents the results of assessing the cytotoxicity of tear substitutes, which demonstrate that these drugs can have a cytostatic effect in vitro and differ in their cytotoxic potential. In recent years, the problem of drug therapy of patients with dry eye syndrome has been attracting increasing attention of ophthalmologists, so screening the cytotoxicity of a wide range of tear substitutes using cell culture-based test systems can promote the rational selection of these drugs

Pre-Pegmatite Stage in Peralkaline Magmatic Process: Insights from Poikilitic Syenites from the Lovozero Massif, Kola Peninsula, Russia

The Lovozero peralkaline massif (Kola Peninsula, Russia) is widely known for its unique mineral diversity, and most of the rare metal minerals are found in pegmatites, which are spatially associated with poikilitic rocks (approximately 5% of the massif volume). In order to determine the reasons for this relationship, we have investigated petrography and the chemical composition of poikilitic rocks as well as the chemical composition of the rock-forming and accessory minerals in these rocks. The differentiation of magmatic melt during the formation of the rocks of the Lovozero massif followed the path: lujavrite → foyaite → urtite (magmatic stage) → pegmatite (hydrothermal stage). Yet, for peralkaline systems, the transition between magmatic melt and hydrothermal solution is gradual. In the case of the initially high content of volatiles in the melt, the differentiation path was probably as follows: lujavrite → foyaite (magmatic stage) → urtitization of foyaite → pegmatite (hydrothermal stage). Poikilitic rocks were formed at the stage of urtitization, and we called them pre-pegmatites. Indeed, the poikilitic rocks have a metasomatic texture and, in terms of chemical composition, correspond to magmatic urtite. The reason for the abundance of rare metal minerals in pegmatites associated with poikilitic rocks is that almost only one nepheline is deposited during urtitization, whereas during the magmatic crystallization of urtite, rare elements form accessory minerals in the rock and are less concentrated in the residual solution

Alteration of Feldspathoids Changes pH of Late-Magmatic Fluids: A Case Study from the Lovozero Peralkaline Massif, Russia

The 360-370-Ma-old Lovozero peralkaline massif (NW Russia) is a layered nepheline syenitic–foidolitic pluton. In the rocks of the massif, late-stage (auto)metasomatic alterations of rock-forming minerals are quite intense. We studied the products of the alteration of nepheline and sodalite via microtextural, microprobe, and spectroscopic methods. We found that these minerals are extensively replaced by the association between natrolite + nordstrandite ± böhmite ± paranatrolite in accordance with the following reactions: 3Nph + 4H2O → Ntr + Nsd + NaOH; 6Nph + 9H2O → Ntr + Pntr + 2Nsd + 2NaOH; Sdl + 4H2O → Ntr + Nsd + NaOH + NaCl, where Nph is nepheline, Ntr is natrolite, Nsd is nordstrandite, Pntr is paranatrolite, and Sdl is sodalite. As a result, about one-third of the sodium from nepheline (and sodalite) is set free and passes into the fluid. This leads to an increase in the Na/Cl ratio and, hence, the pH of the fluid. An increase in pH stabilizes hyperagpaitic minerals (e.g., ussingite, villiaumite, thermonatrite, and trona), which can crystallize in close proximity to pseudomorphized nepheline and sodalite. Thus, the alteration of feldspathoids increases the pH of late-magmatic fluids, which in turn can lead to the crystallization of hyperagpaitic minerals

Dissolution of the Eudialyte-Group Minerals: Experimental Modeling of Natural Processes

Eudialyte-group minerals (EGMs) are typical accessory or rock-forming minerals of the Lovozero peralkaline massif (Kola Peninsula, Russia). The EGM grains in the rocks of the massif are often replaced by an association of various secondary minerals such as lovozerite and wöhlerite group minerals, as well as terskite, catapleiite, elpidite, gaidonnayite, vlasovite, zircon, and loparite-(Ce). However, EGMs in the Lovozero massif can be not only pseudomorphized, but also partially or completely dissolved. The partial dissolution of eudialyte grains was simulated in three series of experiments, and the results obtained were compared with natural samples. Observations in natural samples and experimental studies have shown that the partial dissolution of eudialyte-group minerals occurs in two stages: (1) loss of sodium and hydration; (2) loss of other cations not included in the zirconosilicate framework. This process proceeds most intensively in acidic hydrothermal solutions and may be responsible for the appearance of new mineral species in the eudialyte group

Who Is Who in the Eudialyte Group: A New Algorithm for the Express Allocation of a Mineral Name Based on the Chemical Composition

Eudialyte-group minerals (EGMs) are Na-Ca zirconosilicates typical for peralkaline plutonic rocks. In the zeolite-like crystal structure of these minerals, there are many sites of different volumes and configurations, and therefore EGMs can include up to one-third of the periodic table. Although there are preferred sites for many elements in the crystal structure of eudialyte-group minerals, the same element can appear in several sites. In addition, many sites may be partially or fully vacant. Currently, 30 mineral species are established in the eudialyte group. However, this diversity is, in fact, limited to holotype specimens. To name any mineral from the eudialyte group, you need to solve its crystal structure and compare it with holotypes. Meanwhile, the composition (and, therefore, the name) of any mineral of the eudialyte group is an excellent indicator of the composition of the mineral-forming media, which is very important to petrological and mineralogical studies. In this article, we propose a diagnostic scheme for minerals of the eudialyte group, based only on the chemical composition. The scheme includes five consecutive steps, each of which evaluates the content of a species-forming element (or the sum of such elements). This scheme can be supplemented by new members without changing its hierarchical structure

Experimental Modeling of Natural Processes of Nepheline Alteration

Nepheline, ideally Na3K(Al4Si4O16) is a key mineral of silica-undersaturated igneous rocks. Under subsolidus conditions, nepheline is intensively replaced by numerous secondary minerals, of which various zeolites (mainly natrolite, analcime, gonnardite), as well as cancrinite, muscovite and Al-O-H phases (gibbsite, böhmite, nordstrandite) are the most common. In the rocks of the Lovozero alkaline massif (Kola Peninsula, NW Russia), nepheline is extensively replaced by the association natrolite + nordstrandite ± böhmite ± paranatrolite. To reproduce the conditions for the formation of such a mineral association, a series of experiments were carried out on the dissolution of nepheline in deionized water, 0.5 mol/L NaCl, 0.5 mol/L NaOH, and 0.1 mol/L HCl at 230 °C for 1/5/15 days. When nepheline is partially dissolved, phases and mixtures of phases precipitate on the surface of its grains, and these phases were diagnosed using X-ray powder diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Observations in natural samples and experimental studies have shown that the nepheline alteration in the rocks of the Lovozero massif with the formation of natrolite and Al-O-H phases occurred under the influence of a high to medium salinity solution at a pH of near 6

Who Is Who in the Eudialyte Group: A New Algorithm for the Express Allocation of a Mineral Name Based on the Chemical Composition

Eudialyte-group minerals (EGMs) are Na-Ca zirconosilicates typical for peralkaline plutonic rocks. In the zeolite-like crystal structure of these minerals, there are many sites of different volumes and configurations, and therefore EGMs can include up to one-third of the periodic table. Although there are preferred sites for many elements in the crystal structure of eudialyte-group minerals, the same element can appear in several sites. In addition, many sites may be partially or fully vacant. Currently, 30 mineral species are established in the eudialyte group. However, this diversity is, in fact, limited to holotype specimens. To name any mineral from the eudialyte group, you need to solve its crystal structure and compare it with holotypes. Meanwhile, the composition (and, therefore, the name) of any mineral of the eudialyte group is an excellent indicator of the composition of the mineral-forming media, which is very important to petrological and mineralogical studies. In this article, we propose a diagnostic scheme for minerals of the eudialyte group, based only on the chemical composition. The scheme includes five consecutive steps, each of which evaluates the content of a species-forming element (or the sum of such elements). This scheme can be supplemented by new members without changing its hierarchical structure

Eudialyte Group Minerals from the Lovozero Alkaline Massif, Russia: Occurrence, Chemical Composition, and Petrogenetic Significance

The Lovozero Alkaline Massif intruded through the Archean granite-gneiss and Devonian volcaniclastic rocks ca. 360 Ma ago and formed a large laccolith-type body. The lower part of the massif (the Layered complex) is composed of regularly repeating rhythms: melanocratic nepheline syenite (lujavrite, at the top), leucocratic nepheline syenite (foyaite), foidolite (urtite). The upper part of the massif (the Eudialyte complex) is indistinctly layered, and lujavrite enriched with eudialyte-group minerals (EGM) prevails there. In this article, we present the results of a study of the chemical composition and petrography of more than 400 samples of the EGM from the main types of rock of the Lovozero massif. In all types of rock, the EGM form at the late magmatic stage later than alkaline clinopyroxenes and amphiboles or simultaneously with it. When the crystallization of pyroxenes and EGM is simultaneous, the content of ferrous iron in the EGM composition increases. The Mn/Fe ratio in the EGM increases during fractional crystallization from lujavrite to foyaite and urtite. The same process leads to an increase in the modal content of EGM in the foyaite of the Layered complex and to the appearance of primary minerals of the lovozerite group in the foyaite of the Eudialyte complex

Fluorine Controls Mineral Assemblages of Alkaline Metasomatites

In the Khibiny and Lovozero alkaline massifs, there are numerous xenoliths of the so-called ‘aluminous hornfelses’ composed of uncommon mineral associations, which, firstly, are ultra-aluminous, and secondly, are highly reduced. (K,Na)-feldspar, albite, hercynite, fayalite, minerals of the phlogopite-annite and cordierite-sekaninaite series, corundum, quartz, muscovite, sillimanite, and andalusite are rock-forming minerals. Fluorite, fluorapatite, ilmenite, pyrrhotite, ulvöspinel, troilite, and native iron are characteristic accessory minerals. The protolith of these rocks is unknown. We studied in detail the petrography, mineralogy, and chemical composition of these rocks and believe that hornfelses were formed as a result of the metasomatic influence of foidolites. The main reason for the formation of an unusual aluminous association is the high mobility of aluminum promoted by the formation of fluid expelled from foidolites of the Na-Al-OH-F complexes. Thus, it is fluorine that controls the mobility of aluminum in the fluid and, consequently, the mineral associations of alkaline metasomatites. The gain of alkalis and aluminum to rocks of protolith was the reason for the intense crystallization of (K,Na)-feldspar. As a result, a SiO2 deficiency was formed, and Si-poor, Al-rich silicates and/or oxides crystallized