3 research outputs found

    Sixteen-Year Monitoring of Particulate Matter Exposure in the Parisian Subway: Data Inventory and Compilation in a Database

    Get PDF
    The regularly reported associations between particulate matter (PM) exposure, and morbidity and mortality due to respiratory, cardiovascular, cancer, and metabolic diseases have led to the reduction in recommended outdoor PM10 and PM2.5 exposure limits. However, indoor PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in subway systems in many cities are often higher than outdoor concentrations. The effects of these exposures on subway workers and passengers are not well known, mainly because of the challenges in exposure assessment and the lack of longitudinal studies combining comprehensive exposure and health surveillance. To fulfill this gap, we made an inventory of the PM measurement campaigns conducted in the Parisian subway since 2004. We identified 5856 PM2.5 and 18,148 PM10 results from both personal and stationary air sample measurements that we centralized in a database along with contextual information of each measurement. This database has extensive coverage of the subway network and will enable descriptive and analytical studies of indoor PM exposure in the Parisian subway and its potential effects on human health

    Application of the Bayesian spline method to analyze real-time measurements of ultrafine particle concentration in the Parisian subway

    Full text link
    Background Air pollution in subway environments is a growing concern as it often exceeds WHO recommendations for indoor air quality. Ultrafine particles (UFP), for which there is still no regulation nor a standardized exposure monitoring method, are the strongest contributor to this pollution when the number concentration is used as exposure metric. Objectives We aimed to assess the real-time UFP number concentration in the personal breathing zone (PBZ) of three types of underground Parisian subway professionals and analyze it using a novel Bayesian spline approach. Consecutively, we investigated the effect of job, week day, subway station, worker location, and some further events on UFP number concentrations. Methods The data collection procedure originated from a longitudinal study and lasted for a total duration of 6 weeks (from October 7 to November 15, 2019, i.e. two weeks per type of subway professionals). Time-series were built from the real-time particle number concentration (PNC) measured in the PBZ of professionals during their work-shifts. Complementarily, contextual information expressed as Station, Environment, and Event variables were extracted from activity logbooks completed for every work-shift. A Bayesian spline approach was applied to model the PNC within a Bayesian framework as a function of the mentioned contextual information. Results Overall, the Bayesian spline method suited a real-time personal PNC data modeling approach. The model enabled estimating the differences in UFP exposure between subway professionals, stations, and various locations. Our results suggest a higher PNC closer to the subway tracks, with the highest PNC on subway station platforms. Studied event and week day variables had a lesser influence. Conclusion It was shown that the Bayesian spline method is suitable to investigate individual exposure to UFP in underground subway settings. This method is informative for better documenting the magnitude and variability of UFP exposure, and for understanding the determinants in view of further regulation and control of this exposure

    Additional file 1 of Discriminative potential of exhaled breath condensate biomarkers with respect to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Full text link
    Additional file 1: Supplementary Material Table 1. Eight measured biomarkers concentration. Supplementary Material Table 2. Description (canonic structure) of the two-biomarker model. Supplementary Material Table 3. Performance of the eight-biomarker model. Supplementary Material Table 4. Description (canonic structure) of the eight-biomarker model. Supplementary Material Figure 1. Receiver operating characteristic curve for each biomarker used in the model
    corecore