848 research outputs found
06-21-1971 Correspondence from Harlan to Stewart
I must confess to finding myself a little uncomfortable with your proposed per curiam. I am not convinced that the passages from the Department of Justice advice letter have the same import in context as they do in the order in which they appear on page four of your opinion. In addition, I am inclined to think that the opinion pushes the Government\u27s concession, before us further than they were intended to reach
10-30-1969 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam
After a hearing before a juvenile court judge, appellant DeBacker was found to be a delinquent child and ordered committed to the Boys Training School at Kearney, Nebraska. DeBacker did not seek direct review of his commitment, but instead sought state habeas corpus. The Nebraska District Court dismissed appellant\u27s petition, a divided Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed, and last Term we noted probable jurisdiction over the present appeal. 393 U.S. 1076. Because we find that resolution of the constitutional issues presented by appellant would not be appropriate in the circumstances of this case, the appeal was dismissed. See Rescue Army v. Municipal Court, 331 U.S. 549
05-15-1970 Justice Harlan, Per Curiam
Per Curiam.
Appellees commenced this action in the federal District Court for the Southern District of New York challenging on equal protection and statutory grounds 131-a of the New York Welfare Law which provides for payments to welfare recipients in Nassau, Suffolk, and other New York State counties in lesser amounts then provided for residents of New York City should the Welfare Administrator determine the adequate cause exists for the differential. A three-judge court was convened and it found that appelllees\u27 likelihood for success on their constitutional claim warranted the issuance of preliminary injunction against what it found to be the payment of welfare in violation of the Equal Protection Cause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court found it unnecessary to consider appellees\u27 statutory claims. We noted probable jurisdiction
11-04-1969 Correspondence from Harlan to Stewart
I agree entirely with the result you reach in this case, and with all of the opinion, except I have trouble with two minor matters
01-19-1971 Correspondence from Harlan to Burger
Dear Chief:
I am glad to join your per curiam as is, but I am afraid I would have difficulty in joining if the emendation suggested by my Brother Black is made
09-23-1969 Correspondence from Harlan to Black
Dear Hugo:
I am in favor of expediting consideration of this case as proposed in your memorandum. As presently advised however -- and certainly pending reciept of a response -- I would not favor a summary disposition of the case on the merits
Specifications and bill of material for roaster in ore dressing laboratory of Missouri School of Mines
POSITION OF ROASTER. In the North West corner of the East wing of the Metallurgy Building. The space allowed is nineteen feet (19ft) long by fifteen feet (15ft) wide. The floor is of concrete. The walls are of brick. OBJECT OF ROASTER. to give either an Oxidizing or a Reducing Roast; to partially roast the ore or to give it a dead roast --SPECIFICATIONS, page 1
The still beat
The Still Beat is an exhibition that combines still-life painting with original pop music in a gallery setting. This written thesis examines the process of developing these two distinct bodies of work into a unified exhibition
- …