4 research outputs found

    Outpatient communication patterns in a cancer hospital in China: A qualitative study of doctor–patient encounters

    No full text
    Abstract Objective The paper characterizes outpatient communication in a major cancer hospital in southern China with regard to the structure, style and focus of doctor–patient communication. Method Fifty‐one encounters between doctors and patients were recorded in the outpatient department of the cancer hospital and analysed inductively to identify patterns of doctor–patient outpatient communication. Results Outpatient communication in the cancer hospital is characterized by structuralized conversation, doctor domination of the conversation and a focus on technology during communication. These characteristics suggest an extreme inequality of power between Chinese doctors and patients at the individual level. They are also shaped by the institutional environment of Chinese hospitals. Discussion Measures should be taken at both the interpersonal and institutional level to improve doctor–patient communication. At the micro‐interpersonal level, public education and professional skills training are needed to improve communication and promote mutual understanding between patients and doctors. At the macro‐institutional level, changes are needed in terms of transforming the structural factors that shape doctor–patient communication. Conclusions Structuralized conversation, doctor domination of the conversation and a focus on technology during outpatient encounters present challenges to effective doctor–patient communication. These patterns are shaped by the institutional environment of Chinese hospitals and suggest the extreme power imbalance between Chinese doctors and patients

    The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between social support and work withdrawal behavior: A cross-sectional study among young lung cancer survivors

    No full text
    Objective: The study aimed to explore the predictors of work withdrawal behavior among young lung cancer survivors and examine the mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between social support and work withdrawal behavior. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a cancer center in southern China. A total of 215 young lung cancer survivors were recruited from January 2021 to July 2021 and investigated by a demographic and disease-related questionnaire, the Work Withdrawal Behavior Scale, Social Support Rating Scale, and General Self-efficacy Scale. Data analysis was performed ​using ​IBM SPSS 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and PROCESS macro version 3.3 for SPSS developed by Preacher and Hayes. Results: The mean score of work withdrawal behavior was 3.02 (±0.70). Existing symptoms, income, residence, the duration of postoperative rest time, social support, and self-efficacy were the predictors and explained 70.2% of the variance of work withdrawal behavior. The mediating effect of self-efficacy was identified between social support and work withdrawal behavior (indirect effect ​= ​0.36, bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [−0.542 to −0.197]). Conclusions: Work withdrawal behavior was prevalent among young lung cancer survivors. Social support and self-efficacy were significantly associated with work withdrawal behavior, and self-efficacy was identified as a mediator between social support and work withdrawal behavior among this group. Health professionals could help them return and adapt to work by relieving their symptoms, providing social support, and enhancing their self-efficacy

    Comparative efficacy of different combinations of acapella, active cycle of breathing technique, and external diaphragmatic pacing in perioperative patients with lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial

    No full text
    Abstract Background Acapella plus active cycle of breathing technique (ACBT), external diaphragm pacemaker (EDP) plus ACBT have been shown to facilitate the recovery of functional capacity and lung function in patients suffering from airway obstruction but the efficacy in perioperative patients with lung cancer has not been proven. Methods We conducted a three-arm, prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled trial in patients with lung cancer who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy in the department of thoracic surgery, China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive Acapella plus ACBT, EDP plus ACBT, or ACBT group (control group) using SAS software. The primary outcome was functional capacity, measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Results We recruited 363 participants over 17 months: 123 assigned to the Acapella plus ACBT group, 119 to the EDP plus ACBT group, and 121 to the ACBT group. Statistically significant differences were noted for functional capacity between the EDP plus ACBT and control groups at each follow-up time (1-week follow-up: difference = 47.25 m, 95% CI, 31.56–62.93; P < 0.001; and 1-month follow-up: difference = 49.72 m, 95% CI, 34.04–65.41; P < 0.001), between the Acapella plus ACBT and control groups at postoperative week 1 (difference = 35.23 m, 95% CI, 19.30–51.16; P < 0.001) and postoperative month 1 (difference = 34.96 m, 95% CI, 19.03–50.89; P < 0.001), and between the EDP plus ACBT and Acapella plus ACBT groups at 1-month follow-up (difference = 14.76 m, 95% CI, 1.34–28.19; P = 0.0316). Conclusion EDP plus ACBT and Acapella plus ACBT significantly improved functional capacity and lung function in perioperative patients with lung cancer, compared with single-model ACBT, and the effects of EDP plus ACBT were clearly superior to those of other programs. Trial registration The study was registered in the clinical trial database (clinicaltrials.gov) on June 4, 2021 (No. NCT04914624)

    Intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a single-arm, phase II trial

    No full text
    Abstract Background Two cycles of neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade plus chemotherapy induced favorable pathological response and tolerant toxicity in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, approximately 25% of patients relapsed within 1 year after surgery, indicating that a short course of treatment may not be sufficient. Therefore, exploring the effects of intensive treatment is needed for optimal clinical outcomes. Methods Locally advanced ESCC patients were administered three cycles of camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine, followed by thoracoscopic esophagectomy. The primary endpoint was pathologic response. Secondary endpoints included safety, feasibility, radiologic response, survival outcomes, and immunologic/genomic correlates of efficacy. Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled in the study. Forty-two patients received surgery, and R0 resection was achieved in all cases. The complete and major pathological response rates were 33.3% and 64.3%, respectively, and the objective response rate was 80.0%. Three cycles of treatment significantly improved T down-staging compared to two cycles (P = 0.03). The most common treatment-related adverse events were grades 1–2, and no surgical delay was reported. With a median follow-up of 24.3 months, the 1-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were both 97.6%, and the 2-year disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 92.3% and 97.6%, respectively. Three patients experienced disease recurrence or metastasis ranging from 12.5 to 25.8 months after surgery, and one patient died 6 months after surgery due to cardiovascular disease. Neither programmed death-ligand 1 expression nor tumor mutational burden was associated with pathological response. An increased infiltration of CD56 dim natural killer cells in the pretreatment tumor was correlated with better pathological response in the primary tumor. Conclusions It seems probable that intensive cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and capecitabine increased tumor regression and improved survival outcomes. Randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate these findings. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000029807, Registered February 14, 2020, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=49459
    corecore