8 research outputs found
Optimization of GelGreen<sup>â„¢</sup> concentration in CsCl density gradients.
<p>The concentrations of GelGreen<sup>â„¢</sup> (from left to right) were 1X, 5X, 10X, 15X, 20X, 25X, 30X and 50X in CsCl density gradients, respectively. The locations of DNA bands are pointed by arrows.</p
Quantitative distribution of bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number across all the fractions.
<p>Quantitative distribution of bacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number across all the fractions.</p
Molecular structures of GelGreen<sup>™</sup> (a) and SYBR<sup>®</sup> Safe (b).
<p>Molecular structures of GelGreen<sup>™</sup> (a) and SYBR<sup>®</sup> Safe (b).</p
Visualization of DNA bands stained by GelGreen<sup>â„¢</sup> with environmental DNA after SIP incubation (a) and relative abundance of bacterial 16S rRNA gene, <i>amoA</i> gene of AOA and AOB (b).
<p>In Fig 7a, 5 μg and 10 μg labeled-DNA were added into samples A and B, respectively. Fractions I, II, III, IV and V show the range of fractions fractionated by needles and syringes.</p
Detection limit of environmental DNA in CsCl density gradients stained by GelGreen<sup>â„¢</sup> under its optimal concentration.
<p>From left to right, 0 μg, 0.1 μg, 0.2 μg, 0.5 μg, 0.8 μg, 1.0 μg, 2.0 μg and 5.0 μg environmental DNA were used. The locations of DNA bands are indicated by arrows. Fractions I, II, III and IV show the range of fractions withdrawn by needles and syringes.</p
Schematic diagram summarizing steps of modified needle extraction.
<p>Fractions I, II, III, IV and V show the range of fractions withdrawn by needles and syringes.</p
Comparison of GelGreen<sup>™</sup> and SYBR<sup>®</sup> Safe staining with 5 μg environmental DNA in CsCl density gradients with TE or GB buffer.
<p>A, B, C and D treatment represent GelGreen<sup>™</sup> in TE buffer, GelGreen<sup>™</sup> in GB buffer, SYBR<sup>®</sup> Safe in TE buffer and SYBR<sup>®</sup> Safe in GB buffer, respectively. The locations of DNA bands are pointed by arrows.</p
Metatranscriptome Revealed the Efficacy and Safety of a Prospective Approach for Agricultural Wastewater Reuse: Achieving Ammonia Retention during Biological Treatment by a Novel Natural Inhibitor Epsilon-Poly‑l‑Lysine
Appropriate inhibitors might play important roles in
achieving
ammonia retention in biological wastewater treatment and its reuse
in agriculture. In this study, the feasibility of epsilon-poly-l-lysine (ε-PL) as a novel natural ammonia oxidation inhibitor
was investigated. Significant inhibition (ammonia oxidation inhibition
rate was up to 96.83%) was achieved by treating the sludge with ε-PL
(400 mg/L, 12 h soaking) only once and maintaining for six cycles.
Meanwhile, the organic matter and nitrite removal was not affected.
This method was effective under the common environmental conditions
of biological wastewater treatment. Metatranscriptome uncovered the
possible action mechanisms of ε-PL. The ammonia oxidation inhibition
was due to the co-decrease of Nitrosomonas abundance,
ammonia oxidation genes, and the cellular responses of Nitrosomonas. Thauera and Dechloromonas could
adapt to ε-PL by stimulating stress responses, which maintained
the organic matter and nitrite removal. Importantly, ε-PL did
not cause the enhancement of antibiotic resistance genes and virulent
factors. Therefore, ε-PL showed a great potential of ammonia
retention, which could be applied in the biological treatment of wastewater
for agricultural reuse