Evaluating subclinical left ventricular and left atrial dysfunction in idiopathic atrial fibrillation: A speckle-tracking based strain-analysis

OBJECTIVE: A subset of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) presents without established AF risk factors and normal left ventricular (LV) systolic function, called idiopathic AF (IAF). Traditionally, echocardiography derived LV dimensions and ejection fraction (EF) are used to exclude LV dysfunction in IAF, but their sensitivity is limited. Our objective is to evaluate the presence of subtle alterations in LV function despite normal LVEF in patients with IAF compared to healthy controls, using speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) based global longitudinal strain (GLS). METHODS: Standard transthoracic echocardiography was performed in 80 patients with IAF and 129 healthy controls. Patients with overt cardiac disease as well as known established AF risk factors were excluded. STE analysis was performed to assess GLS of the LV, and left atrial strain (LAS). RESULTS: LVEF was normal and comparable between patients with IAF and healthy controls (63 ± 4% for both groups; p = 0.801). Mean GLS was within normal limits for both groups but statistically significantly more negative in patients with IAF (-20.6 ± 2.5% vs. -19.7 ± 2.5%; p = 0.016), however not when indexed for ventricular cycle length (p = 0.784). No differences in LA volume or non-indexed LAS were seen in patients with IAF compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: In this selected group of IAF patients, STE did not detect any overt LV or LA dysfunction compared to healthy controls. Thus, IAF occurred in these patients not only in the absence of established AF risk factors but also without evidence of ventricular or atrial dysfunction

Global Longitudinal Strain is Incremental to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction for the Prediction of Outcome in Optimally Treated Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients

Background Speckle tracking echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) predicts outcome in patients with new onset heart failure. Still, its incremental value on top of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with nonischemic, nonvalvular dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) after optimal heart failure treatment remains unknown. Methods and Results Patients with DCM were included at the outpatient clinics of 2 centers in the Netherlands and Italy. The prognostic value of 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic global longitudinal strain was evaluated when being on optimal heart failure medication for at least 6 months. Outcome was defined as the combination of sudden or cardiac death, life-threatening arrhythmias, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 323 patients with DCM (66% men, age 55±14 years) were included. The mean LVEF was 42%±11% and mean GLS after optimal heart failure treatment was -15%±4%. Twenty percent (64/323) of all patients reached the primary outcome after optimal heart failure treatment (median follow-up of 6[4-9] years). New York Heart Association class ≥3, LVEF, and GLS remained associated with the outcome in the multivariable-adjusted model (New York Heart Association class: hazard ratio [HR], 3.43; 95% CI, 1.49-7.90, P=0.004; LVEF: HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11-4.10, P=0.024; GLS: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.18-4.29, P=0.015), whereas left ventricular end-diastolic diameter index, left atrial volume index, and delta GLS were not. The addition of GLS to New York Heart Association class and LVEF improved the goodness of fit (log likelihood ratio test P<0.001) and discrimination (Harrell's C 0.703). Conclusions Within this bicenter study, GLS emerged as an independent and incremental predictor of adverse outcome, which exceeded LVEF in patients with optimally treated DCM. This presses the need to routinely include GLS in the echocardiographic follow-up of DCM

Global Longitudinal Strain is Incremental to Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction for the Prediction of Outcome in Optimally Treated Dilated Cardiomyopathy Patients

BACKGROUND: Speckle tracking echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) predicts outcome in patients with new onset heart failure. Still, its incremental value on top of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with nonischemic, nonvalvular dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) after optimal heart failure treatment remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with DCM were included at the outpatient clinics of 2 centers in the Netherlands and Italy. The prognostic value of 2‐dimensional speckle tracking echocardiographic global longitudinal strain was evaluated when being on optimal heart failure medication for at least 6 months. Outcome was defined as the combination of sudden or cardiac death, life‐threatening arrhythmias, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 323 patients with DCM (66% men, age 55±14 years) were included. The mean LVEF was 42%±11% and mean GLS after optimal heart failure treatment was −15%±4%. Twenty percent (64/323) of all patients reached the primary outcome after optimal heart failure treatment (median follow‐up of 6[4–9] years). New York Heart Association class ≥3, LVEF, and GLS remained associated with the outcome in the multivariable‐adjusted model (New York Heart Association class: hazard ratio [HR], 3.43; 95% CI, 1.49–7.90, P=0.004; LVEF: HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11–4.10, P=0.024; GLS: HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.18–4.29, P=0.015), whereas left ventricular end‐diastolic diameter index, left atrial volume index, and delta GLS were not. The addition of GLS to New York Heart Association class and LVEF improved the goodness of fit (log likelihood ratio test P<0.001) and discrimination (Harrell’s C 0.703). CONCLUSIONS: Within this bicenter study, GLS emerged as an independent and incremental predictor of adverse outcome, which exceeded LVEF in patients with optimally treated DCM. This presses the need to routinely include GLS in the echocardiographic follow‐up of DCM