1 research outputs found
A Clinical Histomorphological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Breast Neoplasms.
Breast Cancer Is The Most Common Carcinoma In Females Which Accounts
For 22% Of All Female Cancers. It Is More Than Twice The Occurrence Of Carcinoma In
Females At Any Other Site.29 In Southern India, Breast Cancer Is The Second Most
Common Cancer Among Women.28 The Incidence Of The Disease Had Been Increasing
In Both Developed And Developing Countries Until 1980, But Still Continues To
Increase In The Developing Countries.
Breast Disorders Encompass A Heterogenous Group Of Lesions
That May Be Presenting As A Palpable Mass, Non-Palpable Abnormality
Detected On Breast Imaging Or An Incidental Microscopic Finding.
Women Who Have Undergone Breast Biopsies Reflect A Spectrum Of
Histologic Conditions From Normal Breast Tissue Of Varying
Physiologic States At One Extreme To Changes Approximating To
Carcinoma At The Other End.60
Etiology Of Breast Cancer Is Multifactorial. It Includes Diet, Reproductive
Life Style, Exogenous And Endogenous Hormones, Body Weight, Alcohol, Smoking
And Physical Activity. However, More Than Most Other Neoplasms, Breast Cancer
Shows Familial Clustering.29 Two High Penetrance Genes Brca1 & Brca2 Greatly
Increase The Cancer Risk. Multigenic Traits Also Play A Significant Role In The
Inherited Susceptibility To Cancer. Literatures Say Carcinoma Breast Is A Disease Of
Affluent Societies Which Have Acquired The Western Style Characterized By High
Calorie Diet Combined With Lack Of Exercise.29
There Have Been Two General Approaches To Prognostication Via
Histopathologic Analysis. The First Categorizes Carcinomas Based On Specific
Features, Recognizing The So Called Special Type Carcinoma. Histopathologic
Features Have Been Recognized As A Necessary Element For Appropriate Management
Of Breast Carcinoma. The Second Approach Evaluates Individual Characteristics Of
The Carcinoma β Grading Which Is Shown To Be Robust Determinant Of Outcome Of
Breast Carcinoma.15 Establishment Of A Uniform System Of Grading Will Increase The
Frequency Of Grading By Pathologists, Significantly Reduce Observer Variation And
Strengthen The Predictive Value Of Histologic Grade.
The Most Widely Accepted System For Grading Invasive Breast Carcinoma Is
The Elston-Ellis System Which Represents The Modification Of The Scarf-Bloom-
Richardson System Established In The Middle Of The Last Century. It Is Performed By
Combining Tissue Architecture (Tubule Formation), Cell Morphology (Nuclear
Pleomorphism) And Assessment Of Cell Proliferation Rate (Mitotic Count).24,29,35,36,52.
Histological Grading Has Been Considered As Too Subjective To Be Used
Clinically And Grading May Be Associated With Lack Of Reproducibility Even When
Performed By Experienced Pathologists. On The Other Hand, Numerous Studies Have
Shown A Significant Association Between Histological Grade And Survival In Breast
Cancer And There Is No Doubt That Grading Is Simple, Quick And Economical To
Perform. Low Histological Grade Is Significantly Related To Recent Or Current Use Of
Combined Hormone Replacement Therapy.42 Histological Grading Identifies Patients
With Low Risk Of Breast Cancer Recurrence. Since It Is Associated With Minimal Cost,
Its Use In Clinical Decision Making May Result In Substantial Savings. Omission Of
Grading From Clinical Decision Making Results In Overseas Of Adjuvant Therapies.
Histological Grade Was Correlated Strongly With Survival. Women With Well
Differentiated Node Negative Cancer Had 97% 5year Distant Disease Free Survival
Rate As Compared With 78% For Women With Poorly Differentiated Cancer.39 The
Relative Importance Of Histologic Grade In Multivariate Analysis May Depend On
Many Factors Such As The Selection Process Of Breast Cancers For The Series Being
Analyzed, The Quality Of Assessment, End Points Chosen And Personal Skill Of The
Pathologist Responsible For Grading.39
It Is Important To Evaluate The Prognostic Value Of Histologic Grade In
Relation To Novel Molecular Genetic Markers. It Remains To Be Seen Whether Some Of
The Novel Biologic Factors Can Replace Histologic Grade As A Simple And Powerful
Prognostic Variable And Produce Superior Result When Performed In Routine Clinical
Setting. A Recent Study Indicates That Grade May Yet Be A More Powerful Predictor
Than Intensively Studied Molecular Genetic Factors Such As P53 And Cerb-2.39
This Study Is Undertaken In View Of Evaluating The Actual Incidence Of Breast
Neoplasms In Semi-Urban Areas Like Thanjavur With Particular Attention To
Demographic Characteristics, Clinical Presentation, Histopathology And Grading