Opportunities for Molecular Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Management: Linking Probe to Treatment

Imaging has been a critical component of multiple sclerosis (MS) management for nearly 40 years. The visual information derived from structural MRI, that is, signs of blood-brain barrier disruption, inflammation and demyelination, and brain and spinal cord atrophy, are the primary metrics used to evaluate therapeutic efficacy in MS. The development of targeted imaging probes has expanded our ability to evaluate and monitor MS and its therapies at the molecular level. Most molecular imaging probes evaluated for MS applications are small molecules initially developed for PET, nearly half of which are derived from U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs and those currently undergoing clinical trials. Superparamagnetic and fluorinated particles have been used for tracking circulating immune cells (in situ labeling) and immunosuppressive or remyelinating therapeutic stem cells (ex vivo labeling) clinically using proton (hydrogen 1 [1H]) and preclinically using fluorine 19 MRI. Translocator protein PET and 1H MR spectroscopy have been demonstrated to complement imaging metrics from structural (gadolinium-enhanced) MRI in nine and six trials for MS disease-modifying therapies, respectively. Still, despite multiple demonstrations of the utility of molecular imaging probes to evaluate the target location and to elucidate the mechanisms of disease-modifying therapies for MS applications, their use has been sparse in both preclinical and clinical settings

Biotargeted nanomedicines for cancer: six tenets before you begin

Biotargeted nanomedicines have captured the attention of academic and industrial scientists who have been motivated by the theoretical possibilities of the ‘magic bullet’ that was first conceptualized by Paul Ehrlich at the beginning of the 20th century. The Biotargeting Working Group, consisting of more than 50 pharmaceutical scientists, engineers, biologists and clinicians, has been formed as part of the National Cancer Institute’s Alliance for Nanotechnology in Cancer to harness collective wisdom in order to tackle conceptual and practical challenges in developing biotargeted nanomedicines for cancer. In modern science and medicine, it is impossible for any individual to be an expert in every aspect of biology, chemistry, materials science, pharmaceutics, toxicology, chemical engineering, imaging, physiology, oncology and regulatory affairs. Drawing on the expertise of leaders from each of these disciplines, this commentary highlights six tenets of biotargeted cancer nanomedicines in order to enable the translation of basic science into clinical practice