Prediction of Solid-State Form of SLS 3D Printed Medicines Using NIR and Raman Spectroscopy

Selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing is capable of revolutionising pharmaceutical manufacturing, by producing amorphous solid dispersions in a one-step manufacturing process. Here, 3D-printed formulations loaded with a model BCS class II drug (20% w/w itraconazole) and three grades of hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) polymer (-SSL, -SL and -L) were produced using SLS 3D printing. Interestingly, the polymers with higher molecular weights (HPC-L and -SL) were found to undergo a uniform sintering process, attributed to the better powder flow characteristics, compared with the lower molecular weight grade (HPC-SSL). XRPD analyses found that the SLS 3D printing process resulted in amorphous conversion of itraconazole for all three polymers, with HPC-SSL retaining a small amount of crystallinity on the drug product surface. The use of process analytical technologies (PAT), including near infrared (NIR) and Raman spectroscopy, was evaluated, to predict the amorphous content, qualitatively and quantitatively, within itraconazole-loaded formulations. Calibration models were developed using partial least squares (PLS) regression, which successfully predicted amorphous content across the range of 0–20% w/w. The models demonstrated excellent linearity (R^{2} = 0.998 and 0.998) and accuracy (RMSEP = 1.04% and 0.63%) for NIR and Raman spectroscopy models, respectively. Overall, this article demonstrates the feasibility of SLS 3D printing to produce solid dispersions containing a BCS II drug, and the potential for NIR and Raman spectroscopy to quantify amorphous content as a non-destructive quality control measure at the point-of-care

Visualizing disintegration of 3D printed tablets in humans using MRI and comparison with in vitro data

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is revolutionising the way that medicines are manufactured today, paving the way towards more personalised medicine. However, there is limited in vivo data on 3D printed dosage forms, and no studies to date have been performed investigating the intestinal behaviour of these drug products in humans, hindering the complete translation of 3D printed medications into clinical practice. Furthermore, it is unknown whether conventional in vitro release tests can accurately predict the in vivo performance of 3D printed formulations in humans. In this study, selective laser sintering (SLS) 3D printing technology has been used to produce two placebo torus-shaped tablets (printlets) using different laser scanning speeds. The printlets were administered to 6 human volunteers, and in vivo disintegration times were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In vitro disintegration tests were performed using a standard USP disintegration apparatus, as well as an alternative method based on the use of reduced media volume and minimal agitation. Printlets fabricated at a laser scanning speed of 90 mm/s exhibited an average in vitro disintegration time of 7.2 ± 1 min (measured using the USP apparatus) and 25.5 ± 4.1 min (measured using the alternative method). In contrast, printlets manufactured at a higher laser scanning speed of 130 mm/s had an in vitro disintegration time of 2.8 ± 0.8 min (USP apparatus) and 18.8 ± 1.9 min (alternative method). When tested in humans, printlets fabricated at a laser scanning speed of 90 mm/s showed an average disintegration time of 17.3 ± 7.2 min, while those manufactured at a laser scanning speed of 130 mm/s exhibited a shorter disintegration time of 12.7 ± 6.8 min. Although the disintegration times obtained using the alternative method more closely resembled those obtained in vivo, no clear correlation was observed between the in vitro and in vivo disintegration times, highlighting the need to develop better in vitro methodology for 3D printed drug products

3D Printing: Advancements in the Development of Personalised Pharmaceuticals for Older Adults

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This is the accepted manuscript version of an article which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35811-1_7Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a revolutionary additive manufacturing technology that constructs objects layer-by-layer. This versatile technology encompasses various processes and possesses unique properties. While originally not intended for this purpose, 3D printing has emerged as a promising approach for personalised pharmaceutical production, specifically Printlets™, which are customised dosage forms. The ageing population presents enduring challenges, and 3D printing offers innovative solutions tailored to this patient subgroup. These solutions encompass a wide range of dosage forms, including multi-drug formulations, orally disintegrating tablets, chewable medicines, multiparticulate systems, and formulations for visually or physically impaired patients. Moreover, besides solid oral dosage forms, 3D printing can also fabricate patient-specific devices for drug delivery via the auricular, topical, intravesical, or vaginal routes. This chapter provides an overview of different 3D printing technologies, highlights the various dosage forms suitable for older patients, and briefly discusses the integration of 3D printing with other advanced digital health technologies

I Spy with My Little Eye: A Paediatric Visual Preferences Survey of 3D Printed Tablets

3D printing (3DP) in the pharmaceutical field is a disruptive technology that allows the preparation of personalised medicines at the point of dispensing. The paediatric population presents a variety of pharmaceutical formulation challenges such as dose flexibility, patient compliance, taste masking and the fear or difficulty to swallow tablets, all factors that could be overcome using the adaptable nature of 3DP. User acceptability studies of 3D printed formulations have been previously carried out in adults; however, feedback from children themselves is essential in establishing the quality target product profile towards the development of age-appropriate medicines. The aim of this study was to investigate the preference of children for different 3D printed tablets (Printlets™) as an important precursor to patient acceptability studies. Four different 3DP technologies; digital light processing (DLP), selective laser sintering (SLS), semi-solid extrusion (SSE) and fused deposition modeling (FDM) were used to prepare placebo printlets with similar physical attributes including size and shape. A single-site, two-part survey was completed with participants aged 4–11 years to determine their preference and opinions based on visual inspection of the printlets. A total of 368 participants completed an individual open questionnaire to visually select the best and worst printlet, and 310 participants completed further non-compulsory open questions to elaborate on their choices. Overall, the DLP printlets were the most visually appealing to the children (61.7%) followed by the SLS printlets (21.2%), and with both the FDM (5.4%) and SSE (11.7%) printlets receiving the lowest scores. However, after being informed that the SSE printlets were chewable, the majority of participants changed their selection and favoured this printlet, despite their original choice, in line with children’s preference towards chewable dosage forms. Participant age and sex displayed no significant differences in printlet selection. Printlet descriptions were grouped into four distinct categories; appearance, perceived taste, texture and familiarity, and were found to be equally important when creating a quality target product profile for paediatric 3D printed formulations. This study is the first to investigate children’s perceptions of printlets, and the findings aim to provide guidance for further development of paediatric-appropriate medicines using different 3DP technologies