4 research outputs found

    Inflammatory arthritis in systemic sclerosis is associated with elevated C-reactive protein and requires musculoskeletal ultrasound for reliable detection.

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES About 25% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Specific causes of CRP elevation are unknown so far. We aimed to investigate whether inflammatory arthritis is associated with CRP elevation. Furthermore, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination compared to musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) for detection of arthritis. METHODS Sixty-five patients with SSc (51 females) were enrolled and allocated into a CRP-positive (CRP+, n = 20; CRP elevated for at least two years prior to enrollment) and a CRP-negative (CRP-; n = 45) cohort. All patients were examined clinically (modified Rodnan Skin Score, mRSS; swollen/tender joint count 66/68), received a comprehensive MSUS of their hands and feet, as well as laboratory testing (antibody status; CRP). Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametrical tests without adjustments. RESULTS Patient with a disease duration 10. CONCLUSION Arthritis is more frequent in CRP + compared to CRP- SSc patients. Compared to MSUS sensitivity of clinical examination is low for the detection of arthritis; this is likely due to skin fibrosis and soft tissue edema. Therefore, regular monitoring via MSUS should be considered as routine assessment in SSc patients

    Inflammatory arthritis in systemic sclerosis is associated with elevated C-reactive protein and requires musculoskeletal ultrasound for reliable detection

    Get PDF
    ObjectivesAbout 25% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) have elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Specific causes of CRP elevation are unknown so far. We aimed to investigate whether inflammatory arthritis is associated with CRP elevation. Furthermore, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of clinical examination compared to musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) for detection of arthritis.MethodsSixty-five patients with SSc (51 females) were enrolled and allocated into a CRP-positive (CRP+, n = 20; CRP elevated for at least two years prior to enrollment) and a CRP-negative (CRP−; n = 45) cohort. All patients were examined clinically (modified Rodnan Skin Score, mRSS; swollen/tender joint count 66/68), received a comprehensive MSUS of their hands and feet, as well as laboratory testing (antibody status; CRP). Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametrical tests without adjustments.ResultsPatient with a disease duration <3 years had higher CRP levels (p = 0.042). Anti-centromere antibodies dominated in CRP- patients (p = 0.013), and anti-Scl70 antibodies in CRP + patients (p = 0.041). Joint effusion and B-mode synovitis prevailed in male (p < 0.00001; p < 0.0001) and CRP + (p = 0.001; p < 0.00001) patients. Power Doppler (PD)-synovitis predominated in patients with diffuse SSc (p = 0.0052). Joint effusion and B-/PD-synovitis were mostly confined to wrists, MTPs and talo-navicular joints. Compared to MSUS, sensitivity of clinical examination was as low as 14.6%; specificity was 87.7%. Sensitivity was reduced by the presence of soft tissue edema or a mRSS > 10.ConclusionArthritis is more frequent in CRP + compared to CRP- SSc patients. Compared to MSUS sensitivity of clinical examination is low for the detection of arthritis; this is likely due to skin fibrosis and soft tissue edema. Therefore, regular monitoring via MSUS should be considered as routine assessment in SSc patients

    Older age onset of systemic sclerosis - accelerated disease progression in all disease subsets

    No full text
    Objectives. Systemic sclerosis is a heterogeneous, multisystem disease. It can occur at any age, but most patients develop the disease between the age of 40 to 50 years. There is controversial evidence on whether/how the age at disease onset affects their clinical phenotype. We here investigate the relationship between age at disease onset and symptoms in a large cohort of SSc patients (IcSSc, dcSSc and SSc-overlap syndromes). Methods. Clinical data of the registry of the German Network for Systemic Scleroderma including 3281 patients were evaluated and subdivided into three age groups at disease onset (60 years). Results. Among all SSc patients, 24.5% developed their first non-Raynaud phenomenon symptoms at the age 60 years), except for gastrointestinal and musculoskeletal involvement. No significant difference was found for the use of corticosteroids. However, significantly, fewer patients older than 60 years received immunosuppressive treatment. Conclusion. In this large registry, similar to 25% of patients developed SSc at an age above 60years with an increased frequency of IcSSc. In this age group, an onset of internal organ involvement was significantly accelerated across all three subsets. These findings suggest that, in the elderly cohort, more frequent follow-up examinations are required for an earlier detection of organ complications

    Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation improves long-term survival-data from a national registry

    No full text
    Background Current recommendations on the management of systemic sclerosis (SSc) suggest that autologous hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT) can be a rescue therapy for patients with rapidly progressive SSc. Objectives To assess the safety and efficacy of HSCT for patients with SSc and to compare these with non-HSCT patients in a control cohort with adjusted risk factors. Methods A retrospective analysis of data from the multicentric German network for systemic scleroderma (DNSS) with 5000 patients with SSc. Control groups consisted of all patients with diffuse cutaneous (dc)-SSc (group A) and an adjusted high-risk cohort of male patients with Scl70-positive dc-SSc (group B). Results Eighty SSc patients received an HSCT 4.1 +/- 4.8 years after SSc diagnosis. Among them, 86.3% had dc-SSc, 43.5% were males, and 71.3% were positive for Scl70 antibodies. The control group A (n=1513) showed a significant underrepresentation of these risk factors for mortality. When the survival of the control group B (n=240) was compared with the HSCT group, a lower mortality of the latter was observed instead. Within 5 years after HSCT, we observed an improvement of the mRSS from 17.6 +/- 11.5 to 11.0 +/- 8.5 (p=0.001) and a stabilization of the DLCO. We did not see differences in transplant-related mortality between patients who received HSCT within 3 years after SSc diagnosis or later. Conclusion Our analysis of real-life data show that the distribution of risk factors for mortality is critical when HSCT cohorts are compared with non-HSCT control groups
    corecore