Polyvascular Atherosclerotic disease: Echocardiographic and metabolic determinants of adverse cardiac outcome

Peripheral Arterial Disease (PAD) is a multifactorial syndrome that most commonly affects people over 60 years of age. With the aging of the population, the prevalence of atherosclerotic disease and its associated adverse outcomes will increase. It has to be noted that the process of established atherothrombosis is not limited to a single arterial location, giving it the character of a systemic and generalized disease. The Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry demonstrated that one out of six patients with (i) PAD, (ii) cerebrovascular disease, or (iii) coronary artery disease had involvement of one or two other arterial beds. Importantly, the presence of multiple affected arterial territories, called polyvascular disease, has been demonstrated to be an independent predictor of long-term cardiovascular outcome in the general population. In response to studies demonstrating the adverse prognosis of atherosclerotic disease, the need for adequate risk factor stratification and reduction has emerged. The importance of risk factor reduction in patients with PAD has resulted in universally recommended atherothrombotic risk factor reduction, with the objective of decreasing the high incidence of heart disease and cerebrovascular disease associated with PAD. In patients with PAD scheduled for vascular surgery, risk factor stratification is directed at the detection of (a)symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in other vascular beds than the primary symptomatic arterial location. Early detection of polyvascular atherosclerotic disease has important consequences for risk factor reduction strategies, including life-style interventions and medical therapy

Timing of Pre-Operative Beta-Blocker Treatment in Vascular Surgery Patients Influence on Post-Operative Outcome

ObjectivesThis study evaluated timing of β-blocker initiation before surgery and its relationship with: 1) pre-operative heart rate and high-sensitivity C-reactive-protein (hs-CRP) levels; and 2) post-operative outcome.BackgroundPerioperative guidelines recommend β-blocker initiation days to weeks before surgery, on the basis of expert opinions.MethodsIn 940 vascular surgery patients, pre-operative heart rate and hs-CRP levels were recorded, next to timing of β-blocker initiation before surgery (0 to 1, >1 to 4, >4 weeks). Pre- and post-operative troponin-T measurements and electrocardiograms were performed routinely. End points were 30-day cardiac events (composite of myocardial infarction and cardiac mortality) and long-term mortality. Multivariate regression analyses, adjusted for cardiac risk factors, evaluated the relation between duration of β-blocker treatment and outcome.ResultsThe β-blockers were initiated 0 to 1, >1 to 4, and >4 weeks before surgery in 158 (17%), 393 (42%), and 389 (41%) patients, respectively. Median heart rate at baseline was 74 (±17) beats/min, 70 (±16) beats/min, and 66 (±15) beats/min (p < 0.001; comparing treatment initiation >1 with <1 week pre-operatively), and hs-CRP was 4.9 (±7.5) mg/l, 4.1 (±.6.0) mg/l, and 4.5 (±6.3) mg/l (p = 0.782), respectively. Treatment initiated >1 to 4 or >4 weeks before surgery was associated with a lower incidence of 30-day cardiac events (odds ratio: 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.76, odds ratio: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.79) and long-term mortality (hazard ratio: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.67, hazard ratio: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.71) compared with treatment initiated <1 week pre-operatively.ConclusionsOur results indicate that β-blocker treatment initiated >1 week before surgery is associated with lower pre-operative heart rate and improved outcome, compared with treatment initiated <1 week pre-operatively. No reduction of median hs-CRP levels was observed in patients receiving β-blocker treatment >1 week compared with patients in whom treatment was initiated between 0 and 1 week before surgery

Colorectal liver metastases: Surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) - a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) are widely accepted techniques to eliminate small unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Although previous studies labelled thermal ablation inferior to surgical resection, the apparent selection bias when comparing patients with unresectable disease to surgical candidates, the superior safety profile, and the competitive overall survival results for the more recent reports mandate the setup of a randomized controlled trial. The objective of the COLLISION trial is to prove non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared to hepatic resection in patients with at least one resectable and ablatable CRLM and no extrahepatic disease. Methods: In this two-arm, single-blind multi-center phase-III clinical trial, six hundred and eighteen patients with at least one CRLM (≤3cm) will be included to undergo either surgical resection or thermal ablation of appointed target lesion(s) (≤3cm). Primary endpoint is OS (overall survival, intention-to-treat analysis). Main secondary endpoints are overall disease-free survival (DFS), time to progression (TTP), time to local progression (TTLP), primary and assisted technique efficacy (PTE, ATE), procedural morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay, assessment of pain and quality of life (QoL), cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Discussion: If thermal ablation proves to be non-inferior in treating lesions ≤3cm, a switch in treatment-method may lead to a reduction of the post-procedural morbidity and mortality, length of hospital stay and incremental costs without compromising oncological outcome for patients with CRLM. Trial registration:NCT03088150 , January 11th 2017

State-of-the-Art Review: Technical and Imaging Considerations in Hybrid Transcatheter and Minimally Invasive Left Ventricular Reconstruction for Ischemic Heart Failure

Negative left ventricular (LV) remodeling consequent to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is characterized by an increase in LV volumes in the presence of a depressed LVEF. In order to restore the shape, size, and function of the LV, operative treatment options to achieve volume reduction and shape reconstruction should be considered. In the past decade, conventional surgical LV reconstruction through a full median sternotomy has evolved towards a hybrid transcatheter and less invasive LV reconstruction. In order to perform a safe and effective hybrid LV reconstruction, thorough knowledge of the technical considerations and adequate use of multimodality imaging both pre- and intraoperatively are fundamental. In addition, a comprehensive understanding of the individual procedural steps from both a cardiological and surgical point of view is required

Association of COPD with carotid wall intima-media thickness in vascular surgery patients

SummaryIntroductionThere is increasing evidence that non-invasive imaging modalities such as ultrasonography may be able to detect subclinical atherosclerotic lesions, and as such may be useful tools for risk-stratification. However, the clinical relevance of these observations remains unknown in patients with COPD. Therefore we investigated the association between COPD and carotid wall intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients undergoing vascular surgery and its relationship with mortality in these patients.MethodsCarotid wall IMT was measured in 585 patients who underwent lower extremity, aortic aneurysm or stenosis repair. Primary study endpoint was increased carotid wall IMT which was defined as IMT≥1.25mm. Secondary study endpoints included total and cardiovascular mortality over a mean follow-up of 1.5 years.ResultsThirty-two percent of patients with mild COPD and 36% of the patients with moderate/severe COPD had increased carotid wall IMT, while only 23% had an increased carotid wall IMT in patients without COPD (p<0.01). COPD was independently associated with an increased carotid wall IMT (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.08–2.36). Among patients with COPD, increased carotid wall IMT was associated with an increased risk of total (HR, 3.18 95% CI 1.93–5.24) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 7.28, 95% CI 3.76–14.07).ConclusionsCOPD is associated with increased carotid wall IMT independent of age and smoking status. Increased carotid wall IMT is associated with increased total and cardiovascular mortality in patients with COPD suggesting that carotid wall measurements may be a good biomarker for morbidity and mortality in these patients

Timing of Noncardiac Surgery After Coronary Artery Stenting With Bare Metal or Drug-Eluting Stents

The current guidelines have recommended postponing noncardiac surgery (NCS) for >= 6 weeks after bare metal stent (BMS) placement and for >= 1 year after drug-eluting stent (DES) placement. However, much debate has ensued about these intervals. The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of different intervals between stenting and NCS and the use of dual antiplatelet therapy on the occurrence of perioperative major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). We identified 550 patients (376 with a DES and 174 with a BMS) by cross-matching the Erasmus Medical Center percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) database with the NCS database. The following intervals between PCI-BMS (3 months) or PCI-DES (12 months) and NCS were studied. MACEs included death, myocardial infarction, and repeated revascularization. In the PCI-BMS group, the rate of MACEs during the intervals of 3 months was 50%, 14%, and 4%, respectively (overall p12 months, respectively, overall p<0.001). Of the patients who experienced a MACE, 45% and 55% were receiving single and dual antiplatelet therapy at NCS, respectively (p = 0.92). The risk of severe bleeding in patients with single and dual therapy at NCS was 4% and 21%, respectively (p<0.001). In conclusion, we found an inverse relation between the interval from PCI to NCS and perioperative MACEs. Continuation of dual antiplatelet therapy until NCS did not provide complete protection against MACEs. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. (Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1229-1234