Clinical Evaluation of the Sorin Synthesis™ Oxygenator With Integrated Arterial Filter

The use of arterial line filters has long been a standard of practice in the field of cardiopulmonary bypass. Sorin Biomedica has designed an adult hollow-fiber oxygenator that not only incorporates their Mimesys® biomimicry coating technology but also has a 40-micron arterial filter as an integrated component of this unique membrane oxygenator. We did a prospective, randomized clinical trial of 54 Synthesis® coated oxygenators and compared them with 54 uncoated Monolyth Pro® oxygenators, the latter of which incorporated an external arterial line filter with a standard bypass loop There were few statistically significant differences found between the Synthesis® group and the Monolyth group with regard to pressure differentials, hemodynamic resistance, and platelet drop. The Synthesis® oxygenator did require less priming volume, but the amount was not significant. Platelet counts with the Phosphorylcholine coated Synthesis oxygenators, using crystalloid perfusates, was similar to our previously published data on platelet protection and Albumin perfusates. We conclude that the Sorin Synthesis® oxygenator appears to have better flow characteristics than the Monolyth oxygenator, with the potential for lower priming volumes. The most clinically significant benefit comes from the elimination of the arterial filter bypass loop and the avoidance of inverting the arterial filter during priming

Evaluation of Mimesys® Phosphorylcholine (PC)-Coated Oxygenators during Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adults

A new generation of coating extracorporeal circuitry with biocompatible polymers has entered the North American perfusion market. This new biomimetic coating process uses synthetic phosphorylcholine (PC) containing polymers to bond covalently to the surface of the Sorin Monolyth® oxygenator, under the brand name of Mimesys®. In part one of a three-part investigation, 160 Mimesys®-coated oxygenators were randomly evaluated against 36 uncoated oxygenators for blood flow, hemodynamic resistance, and pressure differentials. In part two, retrospective analysis of platelet data collected in this study was compared with platelet data collected from a previous investigation using uncoated Monolyth oxygenators with albumin and crystalloid perfusates. Part three examined the risk-adjusted oxygenators, compared with 71 case-matched patients treated with uncoated oxygenators. There was no difference found in the Mimesys-coated group, when compared to the control group, with regard to pressure differentials or hemodynamic resistance. However, we conclude that platelet protection with PC-coated Monolyth’s using crystalloid perfusates, was similar to platelet protection with albumin perfusates, and significantly better than uncoated Monolyths® using crystalloid perfusates