19 research outputs found

    Vertical Uplift Resistance of Two Interfering Horizontal Anchors in Clay

    No full text
    The vertical uplift resistance of two interfering rigid strip plate anchors embedded horizontally at the same level in clay has been examined. The lower and upper bound theorems of the limit analysis in combination with finite-elements and linear optimization have been employed to compute the failure load in a bound form. The analysis is meant for an undrained condition and it incorporates the increase of cohesion with depth. For different clear spacing (S) between the anchors, the magnitude of the efficiency factor (eta c gamma) resulting from the combined components of soil cohesion (c) and soil unit weight (gamma), has been computed for different values of embedment ratio (H/B), the rate of linear increase of cohesion with depth (m) and normalized unit weight (gamma H/c). The magnitude of eta c gamma has been found to reduce continuously with a decrease in the spacing between the anchors, and the uplift resistance becomes minimum for S/B=0. It has been noted that the critical spacing between the anchors required to eliminate the interference effect increases continuously with (1) an increase in H/B, and (2) a decrease in m

    REDUCING COMPUTATIONAL EFFORT IN SOLVING GEOMECHANICS PROBLEMS WITH UPPER BOUND FINITE ELEMENTS LIMIT ANALYSIS AND LINEAR OPTIMIZATION

    No full text
    This paper presents a simple technique for reducing the computational effort while solving any geotechnical stability problem by using the upper bound finite element limit analysis and linear optimization. In the proposed method, the problem domain is discretized into a number of different regions in which a particular order (number of sides) of the polygon is chosen to linearize the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion. A greater order of the polygon needs to be selected only in that region wherein the rate of the plastic strains becomes higher. The computational effort required to solve the problem with this implementation reduces considerably. By using the proposed method, the bearing capacity has been computed for smooth and rough strip footings and the results are found to be quite satisfactory

    Upper bound solution for pullout capacity of vertical anchors in sand using finite elements and limit analysis

    No full text
    The horizontal pullout capacity of vertical anchors embedded in sand has been determined by using an upper bound theorem of the limit analysis in combination with finite elements. The numerical results are presented in nondimensional form to determine the pullout resistance for various combinations of embedment ratio of the anchor (H/B), internal friction angle (ϕ) of sand, and the anchor-soil interface friction angle (δ). The pullout resistance increases with increases in the values of embedment ratio, friction angle of sand and anchor-soil interface friction angle. As compared to earlier reported solutions in literature, the present solution provides a better upper bound on the ultimate collapse load

    Vertical uplift resistance of two horizontal strip anchors with common vertical axis

    No full text
    With an application of the upper bound finite element limit analysis, the vertical pullout capacity of a group of two horizontal strip plate anchors, with the common vertical axis and placed in a cohesive-frictional soil, has been computed. The variation of the uplift factors Fc, Fq and Fy, due to the contributions of soil cohesion, surcharge pressure and unit weight, respectively, has been evaluated for different combinations of S/B and H/B. As compared to single isolated anchor, the group of two anchors generates significantly greater magnitude of Fc for Φ ≤ 20° especially with greater values of H/B and under fully bonded anchor-soil interface condition. The factor Fc attains almost the maximum value when the upper anchor plate is placed midway between ground surface and the lower anchor plate. The factors Fq and Fy, on the other hand, for a group of two anchors are found to remain almost equal to that of a single isolated anchor as long as the levels of the lower plate in the group and the single isolated anchor are kept the same

    Required Lining Pressure for the Stability of Twin Circular Tunnels in Soils

    No full text
    In this study, the stability of twin circular tunnels in purely cohesive and cohesive-frictional soils was evaluated. It is assumed that the internal compressive normal pressure (sigma(i)) required to support the tunnels, by means of lining and the anchorage system, becomes uniform (isotropic) on the tunnels' periphery. The interference effect of twin tunnels on the magnitude of sigma(i) was examined by employing upper-bound limit analysis in conjunction with finite elements and linear optimization. The internal support pressure (sigma(i)) needed to maintain the stability of the tunnels is expressed in the form of a dimensionless parameter (sigma(i)/c), which becomes a function of the dimensionless variables S/D, H/D, gamma D/c, phi, and m, where c refers to soil cohesion, S is the clear spacing between the tunnels, H implies tunnel cover, D corresponds to diameter of each tunnel, phi is the internal friction angle of soil mass, and m accounts for the rate at which the cohesion increases linearly with depth. The effect of the changes in S/D on the magnitude of sigma(i)/c was examined for different combinations of H/D, gamma D/c, m, and phi. The results are presented in the form of nondimensional stability charts that can be readily employed by practicing engineers for the purpose of design. (C) 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers

    Stability of long unsupported twin circular tunnels in soils

    No full text
    The stability of two long unsupported circular parallel tunnels aligned horizontally in fully cohesive and cohesive-frictional soils has been determined. An upper bound limit analysis in combination with finite elements and linear programming is employed to perform the analysis. For different clear spacing (S) between the tunnels, the stability of tunnels is expressed in terms of a non-dimensional stability number (gamma H-max/c); where H is tunnel cover, c refers to soil cohesion, and gamma(max) is maximum unit weight of soil mass which the tunnels can bear without any collapse. The variation of the stability number with tunnels' spacing has been established for different combinations of H/D, m and phi; where D refers to diameter of each tunnel, phi is the internal friction angle of soil and m accounts for the rate at which the cohesion increases linearly with depth. The stability number reduces continuously with a decrease in the spacing between the tunnels. The optimum spacing (S-opt) between the two tunnels required to eliminate the interference effect increases with (i) an increase in H/D and (ii) a decrease in the values of both m and phi. The value of S-opt lies approximately in a range of 1.5D-3.5D with H/D = 1 and 7D-12D with H/D = 7. The results from the analysis compare reasonably well with the different solutions reported in literature. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

    Stability of Unsupported Vertical Circular Excavations

    No full text
    A methodology has been presented for determining the stability of unsupported vertical cylindrical excavations by using an axisymmetric upper bound limit analysis approach in conjunction with finite elements and linear optimization. For the purpose of excavation design, stability numbers (S-n) have been generated for both (1) cohesive-frictional soils and (2) pure cohesive soils, with an additional provision accounting for linearly increasing cohesion with increasing depth by means of a nondimensional factor m. The variation of S-n with H/b has been established for different values of m and phi, where H and b refer to the height and radius of the cylindrical excavation. A number of useful observations have been gathered about the variation of the stability number and nodal velocity patterns as H/b, phi, and m change. The results of the analysis compare quite well with the different solutions reported in the literature. (C) 2014 American Society of Civil Engineers

    Acute abdomen in children with COVID-19

    No full text
    corecore