15 research outputs found
Ctr9, Rtf1, and Leo1 Are Components of the Paf1/RNA Polymerase II Complex
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Paf1-RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex is biochemically and functionally distinct from the Srb-mediator form of Pol II holoenzyme and is required for full expression of a subset of genes. In this work we have used tandem affinity purification tags to isolate the Paf1 complex and mass spectrometry to identify additional components. We have established that Ctr9, Rtf1, and Leo1 are factors that associate with Paf1, Cdc73, and Pol II, but not with the Srb-mediator. Deletion of either PAF1 or CTR9 leads to similar severe pleiotropic phenotypes, which are unaltered when the two mutations are combined. In contrast, we found that deletion of LEO1 or RTF1 leads to few obvious phenotypes, although mutation of RTF1 suppresses mutations in TATA-binding protein, alters transcriptional start sites, and affects elongation. Remarkably, deletion of LEO1 or RTF1 suppresses many paf1Δ phenotypes. In particular, an rtf1Δ paf1Δ double mutant grew faster, was less temperature sensitive, and was more resistant to caffeine and hydroxyurea than a paf1Δ single mutant. In addition, expression of the G(1) cyclin CLN1, reduced nearly threefold in paf1Δ, is restored to wild-type levels in the rtf1Δ paf1Δ double mutant. We suggest that lack of Paf1 results in a defective complex and a block in transcription, which is relieved by removal of Leo1 or Rtf1
Separation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Paf1 Complex from RNA Polymerase II Results in Changes in Its Subnuclear Localization
The yeast Paf1 complex (Paf1C), composed of Paf1, Ctr9, Cdc73, Rtf1, and Leo1, associates with RNA polymerase II (Pol II) at promoters and in the actively transcribed portions of mRNA genes. Loss of Paf1 results in severe phenotypes and significantly reduced levels of the other Paf1C components. In contrast, loss of Rtf1 causes relatively subtle phenotypic changes and no reduction in the other Paf1C factors but disrupts the association of these factors with Pol II and chromatin. To elucidate the fate of the Paf1C when dissociated from Pol II, we examined the localization of the Paf1C components in paf1 and rtf1 mutant yeast strains. We found that although the Paf1C factors remain nuclear in paf1 and rtf1 strains, loss of Paf1 or Rtf1 results in a change in the subnuclear distribution of the remaining factors. In wild-type cells, Paf1C components are present in the nucleoplasm but not the nucleolus. In contrast, in both paf1 and rtf1 strains, the remaining factors are found in the nucleolus as well as the nucleoplasm. Loss of Paf1 affects nucleolar function; we observed that expression of MAK21 and RRP12, important for rRNA processing, is reduced concomitant with an increase in rRNA precursors in a paf1 strain. However, these changes are not the result of relocalization of the Paf1C because loss of Rtf1 does not cause similar changes in rRNA processing. Instead, we speculate that the change in localization may reflect a link between the Paf1C and newly synthesized mRNAs as they exit the nucleus
Direct Interactions between the Paf1 Complex and a Cleavage and Polyadenylation Factor Are Revealed by Dissociation of Paf1 from RNA Polymerase II â–¿
The Paf1 complex (Paf1, Ctr9, Cdc73, Rtf1, and Leo1) is normally associated with RNA polymerase II (Pol II) throughout the transcription cycle. However, the loss of either Rtf1 or Cdc73 results in the detachment of the Paf1 complex from Pol II and the chromatin form of actively transcribed genes. Using functionally tagged forms of the Paf1 complex factors, we have determined that, except for the more loosely associated Rtf1, the remaining components stay stably associated with one another in an RNase-resistant complex after dissociation from Pol II and chromatin. The loss of Paf1, Ctr9, or to a lesser extent Cdc73 or Rtf1 results in reduced levels of serine 2 phosphorylation of the Pol II C-terminal domain and in increased read through of the MAK21 polyadenylation site. We found that the cleavage and polyadenylation factor Cft1 requires the Pol II-associated form of the Paf1 complex for full levels of interaction with the serine 5-phosphorylated form of Pol II. When the Paf1 complex is dissociated from Pol II, a direct interaction between Cft1 and the Paf1 complex can be detected. These results are consistent with the Paf1 complex providing a point of contact for recruitment of 3′-end processing factors at an early point in the transcription cycle. The lack of this connection helps to explain the defects in 3′-end formation observed in the absence of Paf1
The Yeast Paf1-RNA Polymerase II Complex Is Required for Full Expression of a Subset of Cell Cycle-Regulated Genes
We have previously described an alternative form of RNA polymerase II in yeast lacking the Srb and Med proteins but including Paf1, Cdc73, Hpr1, and Ccr4. The Paf1-RNA polymerase II complex (Paf1 complex) acts in the same pathway as the Pkc1-mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and is required for full expression of many cell wall biosynthetic genes. The expression of several of these cell integrity genes, as well as many other Paf1-requiring genes identified by differential display and microarray analyses, is regulated during the cell cycle. To determine whether the Paf1 complex is required for basal or cyclic expression of these genes, we assayed transcript abundance throughout the cell cycle. We found that transcript abundance for a subset of cell cycle-regulated genes, including CLN1, HO, RNR1, and FAR1, is reduced from 2- to 13-fold in a paf1Δ strain, but that this reduction is not promoter dependent. Despite the decreased expression levels, cyclic expression is still observed. We also examined the possibility that the Paf1 complex acts in the same pathway as either SBF (Swi4/Swi6) or MBF (Mbp1/Swi6), the partially redundant cell cycle transcription factors. Consistent with the possibility that they have overlapping essential functions, we found that loss of Paf1 is lethal in combination with loss of Swi4 or Swi6. In addition, overexpression of either Swi4 or Mbp1 suppresses some paf1Δ phenotypes. These data establish that the Paf1 complex plays an important role in the essential regulatory pathway controlled by SBF and MBF