Treatment with curative intent of stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients of 75years: A prospective population-based study

AbstractBackgroundThere is little data on the survival of elderly patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with stage III NSCLC in the Netherlands Cancer Registry/Limburg from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2008 were included.FindingsOne thousand and two patients with stage III were diagnosed, of which 237 were 75years or older. From 228 patients, co-morbidity scores were available. Only 33/237 patients (14.5%) had no co-morbidities, 195 (85.5%) had one or more important co-morbidities, 60 (26.3%) two or more co-morbidities, 18 (7.9%) three or more co-morbidities and 2 patients (0.9%) suffered from four co-morbidities. Forty-eight percent were treated with curative intent. No significant difference in Charlson co-morbidity, age or gender was found between patients receiving curative or palliative intent treatment. Treatment with curative intent was associated with increased overall survival (OS) compared to palliative treatment: median OS 14.2 months (9.6–18.7) versus 5.2months (4.3–6.0), 2-year OS 35.5% versus 12.1%, for curative versus palliative treatment.Patients who received only radiotherapy with curative intent had a median OS of 11.1months (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 6.4–15.8) and a 5-year OS of 20.3%; for sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the median OS was 18.0months (95% CI 12.2–23.7), with a 5-year OS of 14.9%. Only four patients received concurrent chemo-radiation.InterpretationIn this prospective series treating elderly patients with stage III NSCLC with curative intent was associated with significant 5-year survival rates

Expenditure and taxation effects of local public debt and unconditional grants: evidence from Flemish municipalities

info:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

A non-parametric Free Disposal Hull (FDH) approach to technical efficiency: an illustration of radial and graph efficiency measures and some sensitivity results

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the sensitivity of a recently proposed non-parametric approach to technical efficiency measurement. Using a data set of Belgian municipalities, we analyze the sensitivity of the Free Disposal Hull (FDH) approach with respect to the number of input and output dimensions and with respect to sample size, and we consider the impact of outliers on efficiency scores. We finally investigate the effects of using a variety of alternative (radial) efficiency measures.

Quality assurance of axillary radiotherapy in the EORTC AMAROS trial 10981/22023: the dummy run

Purpose: To assess and if needed improve the compliance of participating institutions to the radiotherapy guidelines of the EORTC AMAROS trial 10981/22023 comparing axillary radiotherapy to axillary surgery in sentinel node positive patients with early stage breast cancer. Materials and methods: A transverse contour and a frontal view radiograph of the axillary region of a 'dummy' patient were sent to all institutions intending to participate in the trial with the request to produce a radiotherapy treatment plan according to the protocol guidelines. Additional information on dose prescription, the treatment technique and field matching with breast fields and internal mammary lymph node fields was requested in a questionnaire. Results: Eighteen institutions have performed the dummy run. At first assessment, the dose was not specified according to the protocol in seven cases, while two institutions did not comply with the dose prescription of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. Dose heterogeneity was over 20% in 10 institutions, caused by the use of a two-field technique in eight cases. Ten institutions did not apply special techniques to obtain non-overlapping match planes. In 10 cases, one or more field borders or blocks were positioned incorrectly. Following recommendations from the quality assurance committee given to the participating institutions on an individual basis, 10 institutions adapted their technique. Thereafter, 16 institutions could be accepted for trial participation. Conclusions: A number of potential protocol deviations were found at first assessment. Since recommendations led to a large number of adaptations by the participants, a considerable improvement in protocol compliance and inter-institutional consistency was achieved. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserve