Atrial fibrillation after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

AbstractOBJECTIVESThe study compared the adjusted risk for developing atrial fibrillation (AF) after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).BACKGROUNDAtrial fibrillation results in increased morbidity and delays hospital discharge after CABG. Recently, MIDCAB has been explored as an alternative to CABG. Because of differences in surgical approach between the two procedures, the incidence of AF may differ.METHODSRandomly selected patients undergoing CABG and MIDCAB were examined. Baseline variables and postoperative course were recorded through review of medical record data.RESULTSThe MIDCAB patients were younger than CABG patients (64 ± 12 vs. 67 ± 10, p < 0.04) and had less extensive coronary artery disease (53% of MIDCAB vs. 3% of CABG had single-vessel disease, while 15% of MIDCAB vs. 69% of CABG had triple-vessel disease, p < 0.001 for overall group comparisons). No other differences in clinical or treatment data were noted. Postoperative AF occurred less often after MIDCAB (23% vs 39%, p = 0.02). Other significant factors associated with postoperative AF included age (p = 0.0024), prior AF (p = 0.0007), left main disease (p = 0.01), number of vessels bypassed (p = 0.009), absence of postoperative beta-blocker therapy (p = 0.0001), and a serious postoperative complication (p = 0.0018). Because of differences between CABG and MIDCAB patients, multivariate logistic analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of postoperative AF. The type of surgery (CABG vs. MIDCAB) was no longer a significant predictor of postoperative AF (estimated relative risk for AF in CABG vs. MIDCAB patients: 1.57, 95% confidence interval (0.82–2.52).CONCLUSIONSAlthough AF appears to be less common after MIDCAB than after CABG, the lower incidence is due to different clinical characteristics of patients undergoing these procedures

Impact of Regional Systems of Care on Disparities in Care Among Female and Black Patients Presenting With ST‐Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND: The American Heart Association Mission: Lifeline STEMI (ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction) Systems Accelerator program, conducted in 16 regions across the United States to improve key care processes, resulted in more patients being treated within national guideline goals (time from first medical contact to device: <90 minutes for direct presenters to hospitals capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention; <120 minutes for transfers). We examined whether the effort reduced reperfusion disparities in the proportions of female versus male and black versus white patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In total, 23 809 patients (29.3% female, 82.3% white, and 10.7% black) presented with acute STEMI between July 2012 and March 2014. Change in the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals was compared between sex and race subgroups for patients presenting directly to hospitals capable of performing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=18 267) and patients requiring transfer (n=5542). The intervention was associated with an increase in the proportion of men treated within guideline goals that presented directly (58.7-62.1%, P=0.01) or were transferred (43.3-50.7%, P<0.01). An increase was also seen among white patients who presented directly (57.7-59.9%, P=0.02) or were transferred (43.9-48.8%, P<0.01). There was no change in the proportion of female or black patients treated within guideline goals, including both those presenting directly and transferred. CONCLUSION: The STEMI Systems Accelerator project was associated with an increase in the proportion of patients meeting guideline reperfusion targets for male and white patients but not for female or black patients. Efforts to organize systems of STEMI care should implement additional processes targeting barriers to timely reperfusion among female and black patients

Acute Myocardial Infarction: Etiologies and Mimickers in Young Patients

Acute myocardial infarction is an important cause of death worldwide. While it often affects patients of older age, acute myocardial infarction is garnering more attention as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality among young patients (<45 years of age). More specifically, there is a focus on recognizing the unique etiologies for myocardial infarction in these younger patients as nonatherosclerotic etiologies occur more frequently in this population. As such, there is a potential for delayed and inaccurate diagnoses and treatments that can carry serious clinical implications. The understanding of acute myocardial infarction manifestations in young patients is evolving, but there remains a significant need for better strategies to rapidly diagnose, risk stratify, and manage such patients. This comprehensive review explores the various etiologies for acute myocardial infarction in young adults and outlines the approach to efficient diagnosis and management for these unique patient phenotypes

Patterns of Atrial Fibrillation After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia occurring in patients after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). The purpose of this study was to determine whether AF characteristics were independently associated with postoperative length of stay (LOS). Methods: Two hundred ninety consecutive post‐CABG patients were examined through a detailed chart review. Baseline, intraoperative, and postoperative variables and the characteristics of AF were recorded. AF episodes were divided into single episodes lasting less than 24 hours (short‐lived AF) and recurrent or prolonged ≥24 hours of AF (recurrent/prolonged AF). Results: AF occurred in 94 (32.4%) patients. Twenty‐six (27.7%) of AF patients had short‐lived AF, and 68 (72.3%) of AF patients had recurrent/prolonged AF. Patients with recurrent/prolonged AF were older (P < 0.001) and more likely to have a history of prior AF (P < 0.001) relative to the other groups. Short‐lived AF did not prolong LOS (7.2 ± 2.1 days) relative to patients without AF (7.5 ± 3.9 days), whereas recurrent/prolonged AF significantly prolonged LOS (10.4 ± 6.1 days, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified postoperative complications, recurrent/prolonged AF, age, and digoxin use as independent predictors of LOS. Recurrent/prolonged AF contributed an additional 1.1 days to LOS after adjusting for baseline clinical differences. Conclusions: There are heterogenous patterns of AF after cardiac surgery. A substantial minority of AF is short‐lived and isolated with no impact on LOS; however, recurrent or prolonged AF significantly affects LOS

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery for left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

We aimed to investigate long-term (≥5 years) outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) using a meta-analysis from updated published randomized trials. Our data showed that the risk of all-cause death as well as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar between PCI and CABG, whereas PCI had significantly higher rates of repeat revascularization compared to CABG. Decisions for PCI versus CABG for LMCAD should be based on weighing the upfront morbidity and mortality risk of CABG with late risk of repeat revascularization with PCI and taking into consideration patient preference