How low can we (reliably) go? A method comparison of thyroid-stimulating hormone assays with a focus on low concentrations

Objective: International guidelines concerning subclinical hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer advice absolute cut-off values for aiding clinical decisi ons in the low range of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations. As TSH assays are known to be poorly standardized in the normal to high range, we performed a TSH assay method comparison focusing on the low range. Methods: Sixty samples, selected to cover a wide range of TSH concentrat ions (<0.01 to 120 mIU/L) with oversampling in the lower range (<0.4 mIU/L) , were used for the method comparison between three TSH immunoassays (Cobas, Alinit y and Atellica). In addition, 20 samples were used to assess the coefficient of va riation from duplicate measurements in these three methods. Results: The TSH immunoassays showed standardization differences with a b ias of 7–16% for the total range and 1–14% for the low range. This cou ld lead to a different classification of 1.5% of all measured TSH concentrations <0.40 mIU/L measured in our laboratory over the last 6 months, regarding the clinically imp ortant cut-off value of TSH = 0.1 mIU/L. As the imprecision of the immunoassays varied from 1.6–5.5%, this could lead to a similar reclassification as the bias between imm unoassays. Conclusions: We established the standardization differences of frequently used TSH assays for the total and low concentration ranges. Based on the proportional bias and the imprecision, this effect seems to have limited clinical consequences for the low TSH concentration range. Nevertheless, as guidelines mention absolute TSH values to guide clinical decision-making, caution must be applied when interpreting values close to these cut-offs

Increased fT4 concentrations in patients using levothyroxine without complete suppression of TSH

Introduction: In our hospital, physicians noticed high free thyroxine (fT4) concentrations without complete suppression of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in blood samplesof patients at the outpatient clinic, which appeared to occur more often following the introduction of a new fT4 immunoassay. This discordance may be explained by incorrect reference intervals, analytical issues, or patient-related factors. We aimed to establish the contribution of the possible factors involved. Methods: Reference intervals of both fT4 immunoassays were re-evaluated using blood samples of healthy volunteers and the new immunoassay’s performance was assessed using internal quality controls and external quality rounds. The frequency of discordant fT4 and TSH pairings obtained from laboratory requests were retrospectively analysed using a Delfia (n = 3174) and Cobas cohort (n = 3408). Last, a literature search assessed whether the time of blood draw and the time of levothyroxine (L-T4) ingestion may contribute to higher fT4 concentrations in L-T4 users. Results: The original reference intervals of both fT4 immunoassays were confirmed and no evidence for analytical problems was found. The Delfia (n = 176, 5.5%) and Cobas cohorts (n = 295, 8.7%) showed comparable frequencies of discordance. Interestingly, 72–81% of the discordant results belonged to L-T4 users. Literature indicated the time of blood withdrawal of L-T4 users and, therefore, the time of L-T4 intake as possible explanations. Conclusions: High fT4 without suppressed TSH concentrations can mainly be explained by L-T4 intake. Physicians and laboratory specialists should be aware of this phenomenon to avoid questioning the assay’s performance or unnecessarily adapting the L-T4 dose in patients

Identification of a Novel CYP11B2 Variant in a Family with Varying Degrees of Aldosterone Synthase Deficiency

Isolated aldosterone synthase deficiency is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by pathogenic variants in CYP11B2, resulting in impaired aldosterone synthesis. We report on a neonate with isolated aldosterone synthase deficiency caused by a novel homozygous CYP11B2 variant Chr8: NM_000498.3: c.400G>A p.(Gly134Arg). The patient presented shortly after birth with severe signs of aldosterone deficiency. Interestingly, segregation analysis revealed that the patient's asymptomatic father was also homozygous for the CYP11B2 variant. Biochemical evaluation of the father indicated subclinical enzyme impairment, characterized by elevated aldosterone precursors. Apparently, this homozygous variant led to different clinical phenotypes in two affected relatives. In this manuscript we elaborate on the biochemical and genetic work-up performed and describe potential pitfalls in CYP11B2 sequencing due to its homology to CYP11B1

Improving Science by Overcoming Laboratory Pitfalls With Hormone Measurements

Despite all the effort taken, there is often surprisingly little attention paid to the hormone analyses involved in research studies. Thinking carefully about the quality of the hormone measurements in these studies is, however, of major importance, as this attention to methods may prevent false conclusions and inappropriate follow-up studies. We discuss issues regarding hormone measurements that one should consider, ideally prior to starting, or otherwise, as they arise during a scientific study: quality of the technique, expertise, matrices, timing and storage conditions, freeze-thaw cycles, lot-to-lot and day-to-day variation, analyses per batch or sample-wise, singlicate or duplicate measurements, combining methods, and standardization. This article and the examples mentioned herein aim to clarify the need to pay attention to the hormone analyses, and to help in making decisions. In addition, these examples help editors and reviewers of scientific journals to pay attention to the methods section in the submitted manuscripts and ask the right critical questions when needed

Estradiol reference intervals in women during the menstrual cycle, postmenopausal women and men using an LC-MS/MS method

Background: For optimal medical decision-making, harmonized reference intervals for estradiol for different ages and both sexes are needed. Our aim was to establish reference intervals using a highly accurate and traceable LC-MS/MS method and to compare these with reference intervals in literature. Methods: Estradiol was measured in serum obtained daily during the menstrual cycle of 30 healthy premenopausal women and in serum of 64 men and 33 postmenopausal women. The accuracy of our LC-MS/MS method was demonstrated by a method comparison with the CDC reference method. Results: Our LC-MS/MS method was traceable to the reference method. Estradiol reference interval during the early follicular phase (days −15 to −6) was 31–771 pmol/L; during the late follicular phase (days −5 to −1) 104–1742 pmol/L; during the LH peak (day 0) 275–2864 pmol/L; during the early luteal phase (days +1 to +4) 95–1188 pmol/L; during mid luteal phase (days +5 to +9) 151–1941 pmol/L; during late luteal phase (days +10 to +14) 39–1769 pmol/L. The reference interval for men was 12–136 pmol/L and for postmenopausal women <26 pmol/L. Conclusions: The established estradiol reference intervals can be used for all traceable LC-MS/MS methods for medical-decision making

Lower accuracy of testosterone, cortisol, and free T4 measurements using automated immunoassays in people undergoing hemodialysis

Hormone measurements using automated immunoassays (IAs) can be affected by the sample matrix. Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is less affected by these matrix effects. In clinical laboratories, testosterone, cortisol and, free thyroxine (FT4) are often measured using IAs. Renal failure alters serum composition in blood samples from people undergoing hemodialysis (HDp) and have, therefore, a complex serum constitution compared to healthy controls (HC). The goal of this study was to investigate the accuracy of testosterone, cortisol, and FT4 measurements in samples of HDp and to get more insight in the interfering factors. Thirty serum samples from HDp and HC were collected to measure testosterone, cortisol, and FT4 using a well standardized isotope dilution (ID)-LC-MS/MS method and 5 commercially available automated IAs (Alinity, Atellica, Cobas, Lumipulse, UniCel DXI). Method comparisons between LC-MS/MS and IAs were performed using both HDp and HC samples. Average bias from the LC-MS/MS was for testosterone, cortisol, and FT4 immunoassays respectively up to 92, 7-47 and 16-27% more in HDp than in HC samples and was IA dependent. FT4 IA results were falsely decreased in HDp samples, whereas cortisol and testosterone concentrations in females were predominantly falsely increased. Correlation coefficients between LC-MS/MS and IA results were lower in HDp compared to HC samples. Several IAs for testosterone (in women), cortisol, and FT4 are less reliable in the altered serum matrix of samples of HDp than in HC. Medical and laboratory specialists should be aware of these pitfalls in this specific population

Lower accuracy of testosterone, cortisol, and free T4 measurements using automated immunoassays in people undergoing hemodialysis

Hormone measurements using automated immunoassays (IAs) can be affected by the sample matrix. Liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is less affected by these matrix effects. In clinical laboratories, testosterone, cortisol and, free thyroxine (FT4) are often measured using IAs. Renal failure alters serum composition in blood samples from people undergoing hemodialysis (HDp) and have, therefore, a complex serum constitution compared to healthy controls (HC). The goal of this study was to investigate the accuracy of testosterone, cortisol, and FT4 measurements in samples of HDp and to get more insight in the interfering factors. Thirty serum samples from HDp and HC were collected to measure testosterone, cortisol, and FT4 using a well standardized isotope dilution (ID)-LC-MS/MS method and 5 commercially available automated IAs (Alinity, Atellica, Cobas, Lumipulse, UniCel DXI). Method comparisons between LC-MS/MS and IAs were performed using both HDp and HC samples. Average bias from the LC-MS/MS was for testosterone, cortisol, and FT4 immunoassays respectively up to 92, 7-47 and 16-27% more in HDp than in HC samples and was IA dependent. FT4 IA results were falsely decreased in HDp samples, whereas cortisol and testosterone concentrations in females were predominantly falsely increased. Correlation coefficients between LC-MS/MS and IA results were lower in HDp compared to HC samples. Several IAs for testosterone (in women), cortisol, and FT4 are less reliable in the altered serum matrix of samples of HDp than in HC. Medical and laboratory specialists should be aware of these pitfalls in this specific population

Pregnancy disrupts the accuracy of automated fT4 immunoassays

OBJECTIVE: Thyroid hormone measurements are often performed in pregnant women, as hypo- and hyperthyroidism during pregnancy can severely affect the fetus. Serum free thyroxine (fT4) measurements are well known for their analytical challenges, due to low serum concentrations and the subtle equilibrium between free and bound T4 (to thyroid-binding globulin (TBG), transthyretin and albumin). Pregnant women have high TBG concentrations due to an increase in human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and estrogen and lower albumin concentrations which change the equilibrium and may affect the validity of fT4 measurements in their samples. As accurate serum fT4 measurements in pregnant women are important for the long-term health of the fetus, we aimed to evaluate the accuracy of several fT4 immunoassays in the serum of pregnant women. METHODS: FT4 was measured in healthy controls and pregnant women using a candidate-reference method (LC-MS/MS) and five commercially available automated immunoassays (Alinity (Abbott), Atellica (Siemens), Cobas (Roche), Lumipulse (Fujirebio) and UniCel DXI (Beckman Coulter)). Method comparisons (Bland Altman plots and Passing and Bablok analyses) were performed. RESULTS: Serum samples from both healthy controls (n = 30) and pregnant women (n = 30; mean gestational age, 24.8 weeks) were collected. The fT4 immunoassays deviated +7 to +29% more from the LC-MS/MS in serum samples of pregnant women than healthy controls (falsely high). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that immunoassays overestimate fT4 in pregnant women, which might lead to an overestimation of thyroid status. Physicians and laboratory specialists should be aware of this phenomenon to avoid drawing false conclusions about thyroid function in pregnant women

Mandometer Treatment Not Superior to Treatment as Usual for Anorexia Nervosa

Objective: A comparison of the efficacy of a novel treatment method for anorexia nervosa (AN), the Mandometer treatment (MT), with treatment as usual (TAU). Method: During treatment data were collected to determine weight recovery and outcome as assessed by the Morgan Russell Outcome Assessment Schedule (MROAS). Results: After treatment 63% of the MT group and 85% of the TAU group had reached a normal weight level and both MT and TAU showed a good outcome on the MROAS (75 and 71%, respectively). After two years more MT than TAU patients were still in treatment and more MT patients had relapsed. Discussion: The outcome for both treatments in our study were similar and comparable with, if not better than outcome data of other AN studies. MT is not superior to TAU in outcome results and in relapse rate during the first two years following admission for AN treatment. (C) 2011 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Mu-opioid receptor knockout mice show diminished food-anticipatory activity

We have previously suggested that during or prior to activation of anticipatory behaviour to a coming reward, mu-opioid receptors are activated. To test this hypothesis schedule induced food-anticipatory activity in mu-opioid receptor knockout mice was measured using running wheels. We hypothesized that mu-knockout mice show little food-anticipatory activity. In wildtype mice we observed that food-anticipatory activity increased proportional to reduced food intake levels during daily scheduled food access, and thus reflects the animal's physiological need for food. mu-Knockout mice do not adjust their schedule induced running wheel behaviour prior to and during feeding time in the same way as wildtype mice; rather than showing more running wheel activity before than during feeding, they showed an equal amount of activity before and during feeding. As food-anticipatory activity is dependent on the mesolimbic dopamine system and mu-opioid receptors regulate dopaminergic activity, these data suggest a change in the dopamine system's activity in mu-knockout mice. As we observed that mu-knockout mice tended to show a stronger locomotor activity response than wildtype mice to the indirect dopamine agonist d-amphetamine, it appears that the dopaminergic system per se is intact and sensitive to activation. We found no differences in the expression of pro-opiomelanocortin, a precursor of endogenous endorphin, in the arcuate nucleus between mu-knockout mice and wildtype mice during restricted feeding, showing that the mu-opioid receptor does not regulate endogenous endorphin levels. These data overall suggest a role for mu-opioid receptors in adapting reward related behaviour to the requirements of the environment