3 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
0885 Alzheimer’s disease progression risk in Cognitive Normal Older Adults with Obstructive Sleep Apnea using NIA-AA Research Framework
Abstract Introduction We determined risk profiles of strata-specific cognitive-normal (NL) older-adults with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) characterized by their Aβ, P-Tau & T-tau (ATN) burden, on prospective AD stage-transition Methods Longitudinal study utilizing data from 167 community-dwelling NL older-adults participating in NYU studies on memory, sleep and aging. Subjects had baseline CSF AD-biomarker data and at least two follow-up clinical and neuropsychological data. OSA was defined using AHI4%. Using the NIA-AA Research Framework, data-driven, clinically relevant thresholds for CSF-Aβ42 (≤375pg/ml), P-tau (≥53.7pg/ml) and T-tau (≥367 pg/ml) indicated ATN status respectively. Twenty-four participants with suspected non-AD pathologic change defined as A-T+ were excluded leaving 143 for the analysis. Main outcome was AD stage-transition (i.e., change from Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) 1 or 2 [NL] at baseline to ≥3 [≥ MCI] during follow-up). Logistic mixed-effects models with random intercept and slope were used to assess associations between ATN characterized OSA subjects, and longitudinal AD stage transition, controlling for age-at-baseline, sex, APOE4-status, years-of-education, and their interactions with time. Results Of the 143 participants, 91 (63.8%) were women. The mean (SD) age was 69.6 (7.3) years and follow-up time was 4.73 (3.45) years. Sixteen (11.2%) were OSA+/A+/TN-, and 21 (14.7%) were OSA-/A+/TN-. Ninety-two (64.3%) had normal AD biomarkers (OSA+/A-/T- [n=45] and OSA-/A-/T- [N=47]). To generate strata-specific risks, subjects were combined into groups: (i) OSA subjects with AD pathologic change OSA+/A+/TN [n=25] consisting of OSA+/A+/TN+ [n=9] plus OSA+/A+/TN- [n=16] (ii) non-OSA subjects with AD pathologic change OSA-/A+/TN [n=26]) consisting of OSA-/A+/TN+ [n=5] and OSA-/A+/TN- [n=21] Fourteen subjects (9.8%) transitioned from NL to MCI (i.e., OSA+/A+/TN [6/25], OSA-/A+/TN [3/26], OSA+/A-/TN- [4/45] and OSA-/A-/TN- [3/47]). OSA+/A+/TN subjects were at higher risk of AD stage-transition relative to OSA-/A-/TN- (β = 1.31, 95%CI, 1.02, 1.62); OSA+/A-/TN- (β = 0.89, 95%CI, 0.42, 1.37); and OSA-/A+/TN subjects, (β = 0.71, 95%CI, 0.38, 1.04); P < .01 for all. OSA+/A-/T- vs. OSA-/A-/T- participants did not show differences in cognitive change over time (β = 0.22, 95%CI, -0.15, 0.39, P =.17). Conclusion Among ATN characterized NL older-adults with OSA, those with evidence of AD pathologic change have the greatest risk of developing AD. Support (if any) AASMBTS#231-BS-20, NIAK23AG068534A, AARG-D- 21-848397, BFFA2022033
Ripples on rolandic spikes : A marker of epilepsy severity
Objective: Children with rolandic spikes may or may not have seizures, ranging from benign rolandic epilepsy to severe atypical rolandic epilepsy. We investigated whether ripples (80–250 Hz), superimposed on rolandic spikes in surface electroencephalography (EEG), can differentiate between different entities. Methods: In this cohort study we analyzed the EEG studies of children with rolandic spikes without other EEG or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities. They were divided into the following three groups: (1) rolandic spikes but no epilepsy, (2) typical rolandic epilepsy, and (3) atypical and symptomatic rolandic epilepsy. Ripples superimposed on rolandic spikes were marked in 10 minutes of EEG, and compared to the number of seizures before the EEG. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the predictive value of ripples and spikes for having epilepsy (groups 2 and 3) and for differentiating benign courses (groups 1 or 2) from atypical and symptomatic epilepsy (group 3). Ripples were also marked in the time frequency spectrum of averaged rolandic spikes. Results: Ripples were found in 13 of 22 children. Children without epilepsy showed no ripples, except for a single child with only one ripple. The number of ripples showed a significant positive correlation with the number of seizures (ρ = 0.70, p = 0.001), whereas spikes had a borderline significant correlation (ρ = 0.43, p = 0.05). Presence of more than two ripples was a predictor for having seizures (area under the curve [AUC] 0.84), whereas spikes could not predict having seizures (AUC 0.53). More than five ripples predicted the difference between benign courses and atypical and symptomatic epilepsy (AUC 0.91, sensitivity 63%, specificity 100%). Ripples in the time frequency spectra appeared in all children and were not related to seizures. Significance: Absence of ripples on top of rolandic spikes predicts a relative benign clinical entity, whereas in the presence of several ripples, the child is likely to have more seizures than classical rolandic epilepsy, and pharmacologic treatment might be needed