15 research outputs found
Associations between non-discrimination and training policies and physicians’ attitudes and knowledge about sexual and gender minority patients: a comparison of physicians from two hospitals
Treatment summaries, follow-up care instructions, and patient navigation: could they be combined to improve cancer survivor’s receipt of follow-up care?
Pharmacy students can improve access to quality medicines information by editing Wikipedia articles
Determinants of Survivorship Care Plan Use in US Cancer Programs
Cancer programs are increasingly required to use survivorship care plans (SCPs). Compliance with SCP use requirements will be evaluated at the cancer program level. Cancer program-level determinants of SCP use may suggest strategies for compliance. The objective of this study was to describe SCP use and identify its cancer program-level determinants
Following Through: The Consistency of Survivorship Care Plan Use in United States Cancer Programs
BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine suggests that consistent survivorship care plan (SCP) use involves developing and delivering SCPs to all cancer survivors and their primary care providers (PCPs). We describe the consistency of SCP use in US cancer programs and assess its relationship with cancer program-level determinants. METHODS: We surveyed employees knowledgeable about survivorship practices in cancer programs reporting current SCP use (n=36; 81% response rate). We operationalized consistent SCP use as whether SCPs were (1) developed for ≥75% survivors; (2) delivered to ≥75% survivors; (3) delivered to ≥75% PCPs; and (4) all of the above. We use descriptive statistics to report SCP use consistency and evaluate associations using Fisher’s Exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. RESULTS: SCPs were developed for ≥75% survivors in five programs (15%); eight (25%) delivered ≥75% SCPs to survivors; seven (23%) delivered ≥75% SCPs to PCPs; only one program (4%) met all three criteria. We found relationships between SCP use consistency and geographic region (p = .05); initiating SCP use in response to survivors’ requests (p = .03); and membership in the National Cancer Institute’s National Community Cancer Centers Program (p = .01). CONCLUSION: SCP use is highly inconsistent. Survivors and cancer care quality improvement organizations may play a key role in improving the consistency of SCP use in US cancer programs. Survivors can initiate SCP use. Cancer care quality improvement organizations can specify how cancer programs’ compliance with SCP guidelines will be assessed. Future research should identify mechanisms underlying the relationships that we found