Reduced endocytosis and altered lysosome function in cisplatin-resistant cell lines

We isolated human KB adenocarcinoma cisplatin-resistant (CP-r) cell lines with multidrug-resistance phenotypes because of reduced accumulation of cisplatin and other cytotoxic compounds such as methotrexate and heavy metals. The uptake of horseradish peroxidase (HRPO) and Texas Red dextran was decreased several-fold in KB-CP-r cells, indicating a general defect in fluid-phase endocytosis. In contrast, although EGF receptors were decreased in amount, the kinetics of EGF uptake, a marker of receptor-mediated endocytosis, was similar in sensitive and resistant cells. However, 40–60% of the 125I-EGF released into the medium after uptake into lysosomes of KB-CP-r cells was TCA precipitable as compared to only 10% released by sensitive cells. These results indicate inefficient degradation of internalised 125I-EGF in the lysosomes of KB-CP-r cells, consistent with slower processing of cathepsin L, a lysosomal cysteine protease. Treatment of KB cells by bafilomycin A1, a known inhibitor of the vacuolar proton pump, mimicked the phenotype seen in KB-CP-r cells with reduced uptake of HRPO, 125I-EGF, 14C-carboplatin, and release of TCA precipitable 125I-EGF. KB-CP-r cells also had less acidic lysosomes. KB-CP-r cells were crossresistant to Pseudomonas exotoxin, and Pseudomonas exotoxin-resistant KB cells were crossresistant to cisplatin. Since cells with endosomal acidification defects are known to be resistant to Pseudomonas exotoxin and blocking of endosomal acidification mimics the CP-r phenotype, we conclude that defective endosomal acidification may contribute to acquired cisplatin resistance

Reduction of cellular cisplatin resistance by hyperthermia - a review

Resistance to cisplatin (cDDP) is a major limitation to its clinical effectiveness. Review of literature data indicates that cDDP resistance is a multifactorial phenomenon. This provides an explanation why attempts to reverse or circumvent resistance using cDDP-analogues or combination therapy with modulators of specific resistance mechanisms have had limited success so far. It therefore provides a rationale to use hyperthermia, an agent with pleiotropic effects on cells, in trying to modulate cDDP resistance. In this review the effects of hyperthermia on cDDP cytotoxicity and resistance as well as underlying mechanisms are discussed. Hyperthermia is found to be a powerful modulator of cDDP cytotoxicity, both in sensitive and resistant cells. Relatively high heat doses (60 min 43 degrees C) seem to specifically interfere with cDDP resistance. The mechanism of interaction has not been fully elucidated so far, but seems to consist of multiple (simultaneous) effects on drug accumulation, adduct-formation and -repair. This may explain why hyperthermia seems to be so effective in increasing cDDP cytotoxicity, irrespective of the presence of resistance mechanisms. Therefore, the combination of hyperthermia and cDDP deserves further attention

SENSITIZING FOR CIS-DIAMMINEDICHLOROPLATINUM(II) ACTION BY HYPERTHERMIA IN RESISTANT CELLS

cDDP-resistant Ehrlich ascites tumour (EAT) cells (ER cells) were tested for cellular content of total glutathione, heat sensitivity, cDDP sensitivity and synergistic effects of a combined treatment of heat and chemotherapy. In comparison with the non-resistant EAT cells (EN) the ER cells had an elevated level of glutathione. Treatment With D,L-buthionine-(S,R)-sulphoximine (BSO), resulting in almost complete depletion of cellular glutathione, did not cause drug sensitization. The ER cells were somewhat less heat sensitive compared with the EN cells. Heat chemosensitization was observed for the EN cells as well as for the ER cells. At 43-degrees-C (but not at 42-degrees-C) the thermal enhancement ratio (TER) for cDDP toxicity was significantly higher in the ER cells. The total number of cells killed by the combined treatment was less in the ER cells than in the EN cells. After analysing existing literature, combined with the current results, it is concluded that although cDDP-resistant cells can often considerably be chemosensitized by hyperthermia, in most cases the difference in cDDP sensitivity cannot be overcome totally. In those situations where cDDP-resistant cells are more sensitive to heat and also show a high TER, especially at clinically relevant temperatures, hyperthermia as added modality is indicated for clinical treatment