Decompression without Fusion for Low-Grade Degenerative Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective series. PURPOSE: Assess results of decompression-only surgery for low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis with consideration of instability. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There is no consensus on whether fusion or decompression-only surgery leads to better outcomes for patients with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis. Current trends support fusion but many studies are flawed due to over-generalization without consideration of radiological instability and their variable presentations and natural history. METHODS: Patients with surgically treated degenerative spondylolisthesis from 1990-2013 were included. Clinical and radiological instability measures were included. Any residual or recurrence of symptoms, revision surgery performed and functional outcome scores including the numerical global rate of change scale, visual analogue scale, and modified Barthel index were measured. Follow-up periods for patients were divided into short-term (10 years). RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were recruited. Mechanical low back pain was noted in 48 patients and most (85.4%) had relief of back pain postoperatively. Radiological instability was noted in 4 subjects by flexion-extension radiographs and 12 subjects with prone traction radiographs by increased disc height and reduction of olisthesis and slip angle. From the results of the short-term, mid-term and long-term follow-up, reoperation only occurred within the first 5-year follow-up period. All functional scores improved from preoperative to postoperative 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Decompression-only for low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis has good long-term results despite instability. Further higher-level studies should be performed on this patient group with radiological instability to suggest the superior surgical option.published_or_final_versio

Complications of Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery

published_or_final_versio

Verification Of Measurements Of Lumbar Spinal Dimensions In T1- And T2-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sequences

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to assess patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. No single MRI sequence has been shown to be superior in spinal canal measurements. There are also cost concerns for the increased clinical and research use of MRI. Using only a single sequence may lower the financial burden; however, this requires spinal canal measurements in both T1 and T2 MRI to be reliable. Evidence for this is currently lacking. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and inter-reader reliability of MRI measurements of the lumbar spine and the reliability of measurements using T1- and T2-weighted MRI films. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Forty-two randomly selected patients who underwent spinal stenosis surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Lumbar spinal canal measurements and reliability analysis between T1- and T2-weighted MRI. METHODS: Qualitative ratings of MRI features were performed according to previously published criteria by 2 independent readers (JP-YC, HS). Measurements in axial scan included midline anteroposterior (AP) vertebral body diameter, midvertebral body width, midline AP spinal canal diameter, midline AP dural sac diameter, spinal canal width/interpedicular distance, pedicle width (right and left), and lamina angle. Measurements in the sagittal scan included midline AP body diameter, midvertebral body height, and AP spinal canal diameter. Cronbach alpha was used to characterize intra- and inter-reader reliability for qualitative rating data. Similarly, T1 and T2 comparison also was performed in the same manner. RESULTS: Good to excellent intra- and interobserver reliability was obtained for all measurements. Reliability analysis of all T1 and T2 measurements was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Either T1 or T2 images can be used for measurements of spinal canal dimensions. These findings are of importance, as not every patient undergoing preoperative MRI assessment will necessarily have both sequences performed and only a single sequence is required for research studies. Our findings are also of relevance in measurement of lumbar canal diameters.postprin

Creating a developmental spinal stenosis rat model and utility of somatosensory evoked potential for testing

published_or_final_versio

Psychometric validation of the cross-culturally adapted traditional Chinese version of the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)

Purpose: To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ) and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) into traditional Chinese for their use in patients experiencing low back pain (LBP). Methods: This was a prospective questionnaire translation and psychometric validation of the BBQ and FABQ in Chinese patients with back pain. Patients also completed the Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), the Short Form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaires and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for LBP. Construct validity was assessed using Spearman’s correlation test against the subscales and domains with similar constructs. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (α). Sensitivity was determined by known-group comparisons. Results: A total of 100 patients were recruited. Both BBQ (α = 0.810) and FABQ (α = 0.859) demonstrated excellent overall internal consistency. BBQ scores significantly correlated with ODI scores, VAS-LBP and all domains of SF-12v2 (p < 0.01–0.05), whereas only FABQ Work subscale correlated with ODI scores (p < 0.01) and VAS-LBP (p < 0.05). Both FABQ subscales correlated with only specific domains of SF-12v2 (p < 0.01–0.05). FABQ-W was sensitive to difference between patients with acute versus chronic back pain. Conclusions: Both the adapted BBQ and FABQ (Traditional Chinese-Hong Kong) were demonstrated to have satisfactory psychometric properties, with adequate internal consistencies, construct validity and sensitivity to certain clinical parameters. Our findings were based on a clinically relevant patient group and provides insight into patients’ own perception of back pain which may often be different from that of surgeons. This is a platform for future cross-cultural comparisons

Is minimally invasive surgery superior to open surgery for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis? A systematic review

published_or_final_versio

A rare postoperative complication of anterior lower thoracic instrumentation: diaphragmatic laceration with hemothorax

postprin

Reliability Analysis of the Distal Radius and Ulna Classification for Assessing Skeletal Maturity for Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design Prospective radiographic study. Objective To test the reliability of the Distal Radius and Ulna Classification (DRU). Methods This single-center study included prospectively recruited subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis managed with bracing. The left-hand radiographs were measured using the DRU classification by two examiners. Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis were performed using intraclass correlation (ICC) analysis. Results From these clinics, 161 patients (124 females and 37 males) with left-hand radiographs were included in the study. The mean age was 13.3 years (standard deviation: 1.5). There was excellent intra- (ICC: 0.93 to 0.95) and interobserver (ICC: 0.97) reliability. Conclusions The DRU classification scheme has been shown to be accurate in determining the peak growth phase and growth cessation. It has now been confirmed to be a reliable tool. Future prospective studies should be performed to investigate its application in deciding when to apply bracing or operative treatment.published_or_final_versio

Current Management Of Acute Scaphoid Fractures: A Review

published_or_final_versio