228 research outputs found
Do precision electroweak constraints guarantee \epem collider discovery of at least one Higgs boson of a type-II two-Higgs-doublet model?
The manner in which the parameters of a two-Higgs-doublet model can be chosen
so that no Higgs boson is discovered at a \sqrt{s}\leq 800\gev \epem
collider, while maintaining consistency with current precision electroweak
measurements, is described. The importance of a Giga- factory and higher
collider energies for such a scenario is emphasized.Comment: 6 pages, 3 figure
The NMSSM Close to the R-symmetry Limit and Naturalness in Decays for m_a<2\mb
Dominant decay of a SM-like Higgs boson into particles beyond those contained
in the minimal supersymmetric standard model has been identified as a natural
scenario to avoid fine tuning in electroweak symmetry breaking while satisfying
all LEP limits. In the simplest such extension, the next-to-minimal
supersymmetric model, the lightest CP-even Higgs boson can decay into two
pseudoscalars. In the scenario with least fine tuning the lightest CP-even
Higgs boson has mass of order 100 GeV. In order to escape LEP limits it must
decay to a pair of the lightest CP-odd Higgs bosons with Br(h -> aa)>.7 and
m_a \tau^+ \tau^- or light quarks and gluons). The mass of
the lightest CP-odd Higgs boson is controlled by the soft-trilinear couplings,
A_\lambda(m_Z) and A_\kappa(m_Z). We identify the region of parameter space
where this situation occurs and discuss how natural this scenario is. It turns
out that in order to achieve m_a < 2 m_b with A_\lambda(m_Z), A_\kappa(m_Z) of
order the typical radiative corrections, the required tuning of trilinear
couplings need not be larger than 5-10 %. Further, the necessity for this
tuning can be eliminated in specific SUSY breaking scenarios. Quite
interestingly, Br(h -> aa) is typically above 70 % in this region of parameter
space and thus an appropriately large value requires no additional tuning.Comment: 33 pages, 25 figure
New constraints on a light CP-odd Higgs boson and related NMSSM Ideal Higgs Scenarios
Recent BaBar limits on \br(\Upsilon(3S)\to \gam a\to \gam \tau^+\tau^-) and
\br(\Upsilon(3S)\to \gam a\to \gam \mu^+\mu^-) provide increased constraints
on the a b\anti b coupling of a CP-odd Higgs boson, , with
. We extract these limits from the BaBar data and compare
to the limits previously obtained using other data sets, especially the
CLEO-III \br(\Upsilon(1S)\to \gam\to\tau^+\tau^-) limits. Comparisons are
made to predictions in the context of "ideal"-Higgs NMSSM scenarios, in which
the lightest CP-even Higgs boson, , can have mass below 105\gev (as
preferred by precision electroweak data) and yet can escape old LEP limits by
virtue of decays to a pair of the lightest CP-odd Higgs bosons, , with . Most such scenarios with are
eliminated, but the bulk of the m_{a_1}>7.5\gev scenarios, which are
theoretically the most favored, survive. We also outline the impact of the new
ALEPH LEP results in the \epem\to Z+4\tau channel. For ,
only NMSSM ideal Higgs scenarios with m_{h_1}\gsim 98\gev and close
to satisfy the ALEPH limits. For \tan\beta\lsim 2, the ALEPH limits
are easily satisfied for the most theoretically preferred NMSSM scenarios,
which are those with close to and m_{h_1}\sim
90\gev-100\gev.Comment: 24 pages, 25 figures, paper updated to incorporate final ALEPH limits
in Z+4\tau channel
Probing NMSSM Scenarios with Minimal Fine-Tuning by Searching for Decays of the Upsilon to a Light CP-Odd Higgs Boson
Completely natural electroweak symmetry breaking is easily achieved in
supersymmetric models if there is a SM-like Higgs boson, , with m_h\lsim
100\gev. In the minimal supersymmetric model, such an decays mainly to
b\anti b and is ruled out by LEP constraints. However, if the MSSM Higgs
sector is expanded so that decays mainly to still lighter Higgs bosons,
e.g. , with , and if , then the LEP
constraints are satisfied. In this letter, we show that in the next-to-minimal
supersymmetric model the above and properties (for the lightest CP-even
and CP-odd Higgs bosons, respectively) imply a lower bound on BR(\Upsilon\to
\gam a) that dedicated runs at present (and future) factories can explore.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure
- …