29 research outputs found

    Long-term outcomes for neoadjuvant versus adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer: meta-analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials

    Get PDF
    Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for early breast cancer can make breast-conserving surgery more feasible and might be more likely to eradicate micrometastatic disease than might the same chemotherapy given after surgery. We investigated the long-term benefits and risks of NACT and the influence of tumour characteristics on outcome with a collaborative meta-analysis of individual patient data from relevant randomised trials. Methods We obtained information about prerandomisation tumour characteristics, clinical tumour response, surgery, recurrence, and mortality for 4756 women in ten randomised trials in early breast cancer that began before 2005 and compared NACT with the same chemotherapy given postoperatively. Primary outcomes were tumour response, extent of local therapy, local and distant recurrence, breast cancer death, and overall mortality. Analyses by intention-to-treat used standard regression (for response and frequency of breast-conserving therapy) and log-rank methods (for recurrence and mortality). Findings Patients entered the trials from 1983 to 2002 and median follow-up was 9 years (IQR 5–14), with the last follow-up in 2013. Most chemotherapy was anthracycline based (3838 [81%] of 4756 women). More than two thirds (1349 [69%] of 1947) of women allocated NACT had a complete or partial clinical response. Patients allocated NACT had an increased frequency of breast-conserving therapy (1504 [65%] of 2320 treated with NACT vs 1135 [49%] of 2318 treated with adjuvant chemotherapy). NACT was associated with more frequent local recurrence than was adjuvant chemotherapy: the 15 year local recurrence was 21·4% for NACT versus 15·9% for adjuvant chemotherapy (5·5% increase [95% CI 2·4–8·6]; rate ratio 1·37 [95% CI 1·17–1·61]; p=0·0001). No significant difference between NACT and adjuvant chemotherapy was noted for distant recurrence (15 year risk 38·2% for NACT vs 38·0% for adjuvant chemotherapy; rate ratio 1·02 [95% CI 0·92–1·14]; p=0·66), breast cancer mortality (34·4% vs 33·7%; 1·06 [0·95–1·18]; p=0·31), or death from any cause (40·9% vs 41·2%; 1·04 [0·94–1·15]; p=0·45). Interpretation Tumours downsized by NACT might have higher local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy than might tumours of the same dimensions in women who have not received NACT. Strategies to mitigate the increased local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy in tumours downsized by NACT should be considered—eg, careful tumour localisation, detailed pathological assessment, and appropriate radiotherapy

    Changes in expression of transforming growth factor beta mRNA isoforms in patients undergoing tamoxifen therapy

    No full text
    Tumour was obtained from 37 patients with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, before and during treatment with tamoxifen, and examined qualitatively and semi-qualitatively for mRNA of the three mammalian TGF-beta isoforms. Levels of TGF-beta isoforms were then correlated with tumour response to tamoxifen, as assessed by monthly ultrasound. A high incidence of expression by each isoform was found in tumour material taken both before and during treatment. Semiquantitative assessment of mRNA showed that in the majority of tumours, expression of TGF-beta s did not change markedly with treatment, i.e. beyond that which might have been caused by method reproducibility and tumour heterogeneity (variations of < 100% between pre- and post-treatment samples). In those displaying significant variation with treatment, expression of TGF-beta 1 and -beta 3 increased or decreased in equal numbers, whereas TGF-beta 2 expression tended to increase with treatment. Subdividing tumours by clinical response revealed no significant association between changes in expression of TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 3. There was, however, a significant correlation between changes in expression of TGF-beta 2 and response (P = 0.018). Thus, of 15 responding tumours displaying substantial changes, 11 showed an increase in TGF-beta 2 expression with treatment, whereas none of the non-responding tumours were associated with increased expression. While not providing evidence for a generalised increase in TGF-beta expression with tamoxifen treatment, the present study suggests that response to tamoxifen therapy may be associated with an increase in expression of specific TGF-beta isoforms in some, but not all, tumours
    corecore