24 research outputs found
Changes in neuroplasticity following early-life social adversities
Social adversities experienced in childhood can have a profound impact on the developing brain, leading to the emergence of psychopathologies in adulthood. Despite the burden this places on both the individual and society, the neurobiological aspects mediating this transition remain unclear. Recent advances in preclinical and clinical research have begun examining neuroplasticity-the nervous system's ability to form adaptive changes in response to new experience-in the context of early-life vulnerability to social adversities and plasticity-related alterations following such traumatic events. A key mediator of plasticity-related molecular processes is the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which has also been implicated in various psychiatric disorders related to childhood social adversities. Preclinical and clinical data suggest early-life social adversities (ELSA) might be associated with accelerated maturation of social network circuitry, a possible ontogenic adaptation to the adverse environment. Neural plasticity decreases by adulthood, lessening the efficacy of treatment in ELSA-related psychiatric disorders. However, literature data suggest that by increasing BDNF/TrkB signalling through antidepressant treatment a juvenile-like plasticity state can be induced, which allows for reorganization of the social circuitry when guided by psychotherapy and surrounded by a safe and positive environment
The Fox and the Grapes—How Physical Constraints Affect Value Based Decision Making
<div><p>One fundamental question in decision making research is how humans compute the values that guide their decisions. Recent studies showed that people assign higher value to goods that are closer to them, even when physical proximity should be irrelevant for the decision from a normative perspective. This phenomenon, however, seems reasonable from an evolutionary perspective. Most foraging decisions of animals involve the trade-off between the value that can be obtained and the associated effort of obtaining. Anticipated effort for physically obtaining a good could therefore affect the subjective value of this good. In this experiment, we test this hypothesis by letting participants state their subjective value for snack food while the effort that would be incurred when reaching for it was manipulated. Even though reaching was not required in the experiment, we find that willingness to pay was significantly lower when subjects wore heavy wristbands on their arms. Thus, when reaching was more difficult, items were perceived as less valuable. Importantly, this was only the case when items were physically in front of the participants but not when items were presented as text on a computer screen. Our results suggest automatic interactions of motor and valuation processes which are unexplored to this date and may account for irrational decisions that occur when reward is particularly easy to reach.</p></div