Predicting In Vivo Efficacy of Potential Restenosis Therapies by Cell Culture Studies: Species-Dependent Susceptibility of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Although drug-eluting stents (DES) are successfully utilized for restenosis therapy, the development of local and systemic therapeutic means including nanoparticles (NP) continues. Lack of correlation between in vitro and in vivo studies is one of the major drawbacks in developing new drug delivery systems. The present study was designed to examine the applicability of the arterial explant outgrowth model, and of smooth muscle cells (SMC) cultures for prescreening of possible drugs. Elucidation of different species sensitivity (rat, rabbit, porcine and human) to diverse drugs (tyrphostins, heparin and bisphsophonates) and a delivery system (nanoparticles) could provide a valuable screening tool for further in vivo studies. The anticipated sensitivity ranking from the explant outgrowth model and SMC mitotic rates (porcine>rat>>rabbit>human) do not correlate with the observed relative sensitivity of those animals to antiproliferative therapy in restenosis models (rat≥rabbit>porcine>human). Similarly, the inhibitory profile of the various antirestenotic drugs in SMC cultures (rabbit>porcine>rat>>human) do not correlate with animal studies, the rabbit- and porcine-derived SMC being highly sensitive. The validity of in vitro culture studies for the screening of controlled release delivery systems such as nanoparticles is limited. It is suggested that prescreening studies of possible drug candidates for restenosis therapy should include both SMC cell cultures of rat and human, appropriately designed with a suitable serum

CCN5, a secreted protein, localizes to the nucleus

CCN5, a member of the CCN family of growth factors, inhibits the proliferation and migration of smooth muscle cells in cell culture and animal models. Expressed in both embryonic and adult tissues, CCN5 exhibits a matricellular localization pattern characteristic of secreted proteins that are closely associated with the cell surface. In addition to this observed expression pattern, immunohistochemical evidence suggests the presence of nuclear CCN5 in some cells. To determine if CCN5 localizes to the nucleus we performed immunofluorescence, confocal imaging, and cell fractionation to corroborate the immunohistochemical observations. After confirming the presence of nuclear CCN5 using four independent experimental methods, we identified a single putative nuclear localization signal in the von Willebrand factor C domain of mouse and rat CCN5. Site directed mutagenesis of the three basic amino acids in the putative nuclear localization sequence did not prevent nuclear localization of CCN5 in four different cell types, suggesting that CCN5 nuclear transport is not mediated by the only canonical nuclear localization signal present in the primary amino acid sequence. Future work will address the mechanism of nuclear localization and the function of nuclear versus secreted CCN5