Knee disorders in primary care: design and patient selection of the HONEUR knee cohort.

BACKGROUND: Knee complaints are a frequent reason for consultation in general practice. These patients constitute a specific population compared to secondary care patients. However, information to base treatment decisions on is generally derived from specialistic settings. Our cohort study is aimed at collecting knowledge about prognosis and prognostic factors of knee complaints presented in a primary care setting. This paper describes the methods used for data collection, and discusses potential selectiveness of patient recruitment. METHODS: This is a descriptive prospective cohort study with one-year follow-up. 40 Dutch GPs recruited consecutive patients with incident knee complaints aged 12 years and above from October 2001 to October 2003. Patients were assessed with questionnaires and standardised physical examinations. Additional measurements of subgroups included MRI for recent knee traumas and device assessed function measurements for non-traumatic patients. After the inclusion period we retrospectively searched the computerized medical files of participating GPs to obtain a sample to determine possible selective recruitment. We assessed differences in proportions of gender, traumatic onset of injury and age groups between participants and non-participants using Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We recruited 1068 patients. In a sample of 310 patients visiting the GP, we detected some selective recruitment, indicating an underrepresentation of patients aged 12 to 35 years (OR 1.70; 1.15-2.77), especially among men (OR 2.16; 1.12-4.18). The underrepresentation of patients with traumatic onset of injury was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This cohort is unique in its size, setting, and its range of both age and type of knee complaints. We believe the detected selective recruitment is unlikely to introduce significant bias, as the cohort will be divided into subgroups according to age group or traumatic onset of injury for future analyses. However, the underrepresentation of men in the age group of 12 to 35 years of age warrants caution. Based on the available data, we believe our cohort is an acceptable representation of patients with new knee complaints consulting the GP, and we expect no problems with extrapolation of the results to the general Dutch population

Computer-assisted evaluation of kinematics of the two bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament / Computer-assistierte Evaluation der Kinematik der beiden Bündel des VKB

The aim of this cadaveric study was to describe the kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-intact, posterolateral (PL) bundle-deficient and ACL-deficient knee by applying a protocol for computer-assisted evaluation of knee kinematics. The hypothesis that the PL bundle functions mainly at low knee flexion angles was tested. An optical tracking system was used to acquire knee joint motion on 10 knees during clinical evaluations by tracking markers rigidly attached to the bones. The protocol included acquisition of anterior-posterior (AP) translations and internal-external (IE) rotations, and evaluation of three clinical knee laxity tests (anterior drawer, manual and instrumented Lachman). The data demonstrated no significant contribution to AP translation and IE laxity from the PL bundle over the entire range of motion. The clinical knee laxity tests showed no significant differences between the ACL-intact and PIL bundle-deficient states. The hypothesis could not be proven. Current clinical knee laxity measurements may not be suited for detecting subtle changes such as PL bundle deficiency in the ACL anatomy. The computation of knee laxity might be a step towards a more precise kinematic test of knee stability not only in the native and torn ACL state of the knee but also in the reconstructed knee