Profile of Rural Residential Care Facilities: A chartbook

Section I examines differences in rural and urban RCF characteristics. Section II explores differences in the characteristics and functional status of RCF residents. Section III profiles the services provided by rural and urban RCFs and Section IV examines rural-urban differences in admission and discharge policies and how these might reflect options for aging-in-place in rural and urban RCFs. The final section discusses policy implications for providing residential care in rural areas as part of a broader continuum of LTSS services

Catastrophic Consequences: The Link Between Rural Opioid Use and HIV/AIDS

This chapter from HIV/AIDS in Rural Communities compares the rural–urban prevalence of HIV and opioid use, treatment, and harm reduction, and highlights efforts to control HIV and opioid use in rural states and communities. Rural persons who use opioids appear to have lower perceived risks of contracting HIV and lower perceived consequences associated with heroin use. Close social networks in rural communities and high-risk sex and injection drug use practices may facilitate exposure and transmission of HIV. Rural persons who use opioids may experience numerous potential barriers to HIV and substance abuse treatment and harm reduction activities. Given the challenges of studying a small population of opioid users and dealing with confidential information like HIV status and drug use, studies comparing rural and urban persons within the same state or nationwide will be important going forward.https://digitalcommons.usm.maine.edu/facbooks/1166/thumbnail.jp