The Hall Technique

The contemporary view of caries management focuses on treating carious lesions using less invasive treatment options. The Hall Technique is an innovative, less invasive, operative management option, in which preformed metal crowns (PMCs) are used to seal carious lesions with dentin involvement in primary molars using a glass ionomer luting cement. Thus, removal of carious tissue, tooth preparation, or the use of local anesthesia are not required for the Hall Technique. The PMCs are simply pushed over the tooth, to isolate and seal the carious lesions from the oral cavity, resulting in reduction of the nutrient supply and consequently carious lesion arrest. This makes the Hall Technique a technically simple procedure to perform, in terms of clinical skills, and is well accepted by dentists, children, and their parents. However, it should not be considered as a quick solution to the problem of treating all carious primary molars in children who are unable to cooperate with more invasive treatment. For success, the Hall Technique requires careful case selection, precise carious lesion and pulpal diagnosis, good patient management, and parental cooperation. The Hall Technique is an effective treatment option for management of asymptomatic dentin carious lesions in primary molars with long-term high success rates and is, with a strong evidence base, recommended as part of our armamentarium for everyday use in pediatric dentistry

Molybdenum Cofactor Deficiency: A New HPLC Method for Fast Quantification of S-Sulfocysteine in Urine and Serum

Molybdenum cofactor deficiency (MoCD) is a rare inherited metabolic disorder characterized by severe and progressive neurological damage mainly caused by the loss of sulfite oxidase activity. Elevated urinary levels of sulfite, thiosulfate, and S-sulfocysteine (SSC) are hallmarks in the diagnosis of MoCD and sulfite oxidase deficiency (SOD). Recently, a first successful treatment of a human MoCD type A patient based on a substitution therapy with the molybdenum cofactor precursor cPMP has been reported, resulting in nearly complete normalization of MoCD biomarkers. Knowing the rapid progression of the disease symptoms in nontreated patients, an early diagnosis of MoCD as well as a sensitive method to monitor daily changes in SSC levels, a key marker of sulfite toxicity, is crucial for treatment outcome. Here, we describe a fast and sensitive method for the analysis of SSC in human urine samples using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The analysis is based on precolumn derivatization with O-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) and separation on a C18 reverse phase column coupled to UV detection. The method was extended to human serum analysis and no interference with endogenous amino acids was found. Finally, SSC values from 45 pediatric urine, 75 adult urine, and 24 serum samples from control individuals as well as MoCD patients are reported. Our method represents a cost-effective technique for routine diagnosis of MoCD and SOD, and can be used also to monitor treatment efficiency in those sulfite toxicity disorders on a daily basis

Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: Statin therapy reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and the risk of cardiovascular events, but whether the addition of ezetimibe, a nonstatin drug that reduces intestinal cholesterol absorption, can reduce the rate of cardiovascular events further is not known. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized trial involving 18,144 patients who had been hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome within the preceding 10 days and had LDL cholesterol levels of 50 to 100 mg per deciliter (1.3 to 2.6 mmol per liter) if they were receiving lipid-lowering therapy or 50 to 125 mg per deciliter (1.3 to 3.2 mmol per liter) if they were not receiving lipid-lowering therapy. The combination of simvastatin (40 mg) and ezetimibe (10 mg) (simvastatin-ezetimibe) was compared with simvastatin (40 mg) and placebo (simvastatin monotherapy). The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring rehospitalization, coronary revascularization ( 6530 days after randomization), or nonfatal stroke. The median follow-up was 6 years. RESULTS: The median time-weighted average LDL cholesterol level during the study was 53.7 mg per deciliter (1.4 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, as compared with 69.5 mg per deciliter (1.8 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin-monotherapy group (P<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier event rate for the primary end point at 7 years was 32.7% in the simvastatin-ezetimibe group, as compared with 34.7% in the simvastatin-monotherapy group (absolute risk difference, 2.0 percentage points; hazard ratio, 0.936; 95% confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.99; P = 0.016). Rates of pre-specified muscle, gallbladder, and hepatic adverse effects and cancer were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: When added to statin therapy, ezetimibe resulted in incremental lowering of LDL cholesterol levels and improved cardiovascular outcomes. Moreover, lowering LDL cholesterol to levels below previous targets provided additional benefit