30 research outputs found
Unilateral iliofemoral occlusive disease: Long-term results of the semiclosed endarterectomy with the ringstripper
Nowadays, fewer endarterectomies are performed for treatment of occlusive arterial disease; more often a bypass procedure is done. This study investigates whether the results of the semiclosed endarterectomy for unilateral iliofemoral occlusive discase indeed indicate a wider use of bypass procedures for such short obstructions. Ninety-four patients with an obstructed external iliac and common femoral artery, but with patent ipsilateral common iliac and contralateral iliac arteries, underwent 101 operations. Seven of these patients were operated on at a later stage for occlusive disease on the contralateral side. Ninety-three endarterectomies were performed, and an iliofemoral bypass graft was inserted eight times because an endarterectomy was not feasible. Sixty-two operations were performed for disabling claudication, and 39 operations were performed for limb-threatening ischemia. Eighty-five percent of the patients who underwent an endarterectomy for disabling claudication became asymptomatic. Eighty percent of the patients who underwent an endarterectomy for limb-threatening ischemia became asymptomatic or improved to claudication. After endarterectomy no deaths, false aneurysms, or infections occurred. The patency rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 94%, 83%, and 65%, respectively. We conclude that the semiclosed endarterectomy with the ringstripper of a unilateral obstruction of one external iliac and common femoral artery can be performed with a low morbidity and without deaths and gives good long-term results
Randomized clinical trial of continuous sutures or non-penetrating clips for radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula
Prevalence of Severe Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease on Cardiac CT and MRI in Patients with Extra-cardiac Arterial Disease
Standardised Frailty Indicator as Predictor for Postoperative Delirium after Vascular Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study
Frequency and outcome of re-interventions after endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: A prospective cohort study:A prospective cohort study
AbstractPurpose. To describe frequency, type, and outcome of re-intervention after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).Methods. Between September 1996 and December 2003, 308 patients were treated, with data collected prospectively. No patient was lost to follow up, but two were excluded (one primary conversion, and one post-operative death). Vanguard, Talent, Excluder, Zenith, and Quantum devices were used. Follow up required a CT scan before discharge. Initially, a CT scan was done at each follow up. Subsequently, we used duplex ultrasound and abdominal X-ray, with CT scan used selectively.Results. Mean follow-up was 36±22 months. Re-interventions were required in 47 (15%) patients, 31 (66%) elective and 16 (34%) emergency cases. In 32 patients, the primary re-intervention was successful; in 15 patients an additional 13 secondary and four tertiary re-interventions were required. A total of 72 adjunctive manoeuvres were performed: 49 endovascular (68%) and 23 open (32%). The success of endovascular re-interventions was 80%. The success of open re-interventions was 96%. Open conversions were required in nine patients (3%). There was no mortality.Conclusion. EVAR was associated with a low burden of re-interventions, with only 15% patients requiring re-intervention. Our long-term follow up, without regular CT, was simple and effective