HPLC for Simultaneous Quantification of Total Ceramide, Glucosylceramide, and Ceramide Trihexoside Concentrations in Plasma

BACKGROUND: Simple, reproducible assays are needed for the quantification of sphingolipids, ceramide (Cer), and sphingoid bases. We developed an HPLC method for simultaneous quantification of total plasma concentrations of Cer, glucosylceramide (GlcCer), and ceramide trihexoside (CTH). METHODS: After addition of sphinganine as internal calibrator, we extracted lipids from 50 microL plasma. We deacylated Cer and glycosphingolipids by use of microwave-assisted hydrolysis in methanolic NaOH, followed by derivatization of the liberated amino-group with o-phthaldialdehyde. We separated the derivatized sphingoid bases and lysoglycosphingolipids by HPLC on a C18 reversed-phase column with a methanol/water mobile phase (88:12, vol/vol) and quantified them by use of a fluorescence detector at lambda(ex) 340 nm and lambda(em) 435 nm. RESULTS: Optimal conditions in the Solids/Moisture System SAM-155 microwave oven (CEM Corp.) for the complete deacylation of Cer and neutral glycosphingolipids without decomposition were 60 min at 85% power, fan setting 7. Intra- and interassay CVs were <4% and <14%, respectively, and recovery rates were 87%-113%. The limit of quantification was 2 pmol (0.1 pmol on column), and the method was linear over the interval of 2-200 microL plasma. In samples from 40 healthy individuals, mean (SD) concentrations were 9.0 (2.3) micromol/L for Cer, 6.3 (1.9) micromol/L for GlcCer, and 1.7 (0.5) micromol/L for CTH. Plasma concentrations of GlcCer were higher in Gaucher disease patient samples and of CTH in Fabry disease patient samples. CONCLUSIONS: HPLC enables quantification of total Cer, GlcCer, and CTH in plasma and is useful for the follow-up of patients on therapy for Gaucher or Fabry diseas

Treatment of Fabry Disease: Outcome of a Comparative Trial with Agalsidase Alfa or Beta at a Dose of 0.2 mg/kg

Two different enzyme preparations, agalsidase alfa (Replagal(TM), Shire) and beta (Fabrazyme(TM), Genzyme), are registered for treatment of Fabry disease. We compared the efficacy of and tolerability towards the two agalsidase preparations administered at identical protein dose in a randomized controlled open label trial.Thirty-four Fabry disease patients were treated with either agalsidase alfa or agalsidase beta at equal dose of 0.2 mg/kg biweekly. Primary endpoint was reduction in left ventricular mass after 12 and 24 months of treatment. Other endpoints included occurrence of treatment failure (defined as progression of cardiac, renal or cerebral disease), glomerular filtration rate, pain, anti-agalsidase antibodies, and globotriaosylceramide levels in plasma and urine. After 12 and 24 months of treatment no reduction in left ventricular mass was seen, which was not different between the two treatment groups. Also, no differences in glomerular filtration rate, pain and decline in globotriaosylceramide levels were found. Antibodies developed only in males (4/8 in the agalsidase alfa group and 6/8 in the agalsidase beta group). Treatment failure within 24 months of therapy was seen in 8/34 patients: 6 male patients (3 in each treatment group) and 2 female patients (both agalsidase alfa). The occurrence of treatment failures did not differ between the two treatment groups; chi(2) = 0.38 p = 0.54.Our study revealed no difference in reduction of left ventricular mass or other disease parameters after 12 and 24 months of treatment with either agalsidase alfa or beta at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg biweekly. Treatment failure occurred frequently in both groups and seems related to age and severe pre-treatment disease.International Standard Randomized Clinical Trial ISRCTN45178534 [http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN45178534]