129 research outputs found

    Genetic polymorphism of the iron-regulatory protein-1 and -2 genes in age-related macular degeneration

    Get PDF
    Iron can be involved in the pathogenesis of AMD through the oxidative stress because it may catalyze the Haber–Weiss and Fenton reactions converting hydrogen peroxide to free radicals, which can induce cellular damage. We hypothesized that genetic polymorphism in genes related to iron metabolism may predispose individuals to the development of AMD and therefore we checked for an association between the g.32373708 G>A polymorphism (rs867469) of the IRP1 gene and the g.49520870 G>A (rs17483548) polymorphism of the IRP2 gene and AMD risk as well as the modulation of this association by some environmental and life-style factors. Genotypes were determined in DNA from blood of 269 AMD patients and 116 controls by the allele-specific oligonucleotide-restriction fragment length polymorphism and the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism. An association between AMD, dry and wet forms of AMD and the G/G genotype of the g.32373708 G>A-IRP1 polymorphism was found (OR 3.40, 4.15, and 2.75). On the other hand, the G/A genotype reduced the risk of AMD as well as its dry or wet form (OR 0.23, 0.21, 0.26). Moreover, the G allele of the g.49520870 G>A-IRP2 polymorphism increased the risk of the dry form of the disease (OR 1.51) and the A/A genotype and the A allele decreased such risk (OR 0.43 and 0.66). Our data suggest that the g.32373708 G>A-IRP1 and g.49520870 G>A-IRP2 polymorphisms may be associated with increased risk for AMD

    Treatment of Rat Spinal Cord Injury with the Neurotrophic Factor Albumin-Oleic Acid: Translational Application for Paralysis, Spasticity and Pain

    Get PDF
    Sensorimotor dysfunction following incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) is often characterized by the debilitating symptoms of paralysis, spasticity and pain, which require treatment with novel pleiotropic pharmacological agents. Previous in vitro studies suggest that Albumin (Alb) and Oleic Acid (OA) may play a role together as an endogenous neurotrophic factor. Although Alb can promote basic recovery of motor function after iSCI, the therapeutic effect of OA or Alb-OA on a known translational measure of SCI associated with symptoms of spasticity and change in nociception has not been studied. Following T9 spinal contusion injury in Wistar rats, intrathecal treatment with: i) Saline, ii) Alb (0.4 nanomoles), iii) OA (80 nanomoles), iv) Alb-Elaidic acid (0.4/80 nanomoles), or v) Alb-OA (0.4/80 nanomoles) were evaluated on basic motor function, temporal summation of noxious reflex activity, and with a new test of descending modulation of spinal activity below the SCI up to one month after injury. Albumin, OA and Alb-OA treatment inhibited nociceptive Tibialis Anterior (TA) reflex activity. Moreover Alb-OA synergistically promoted early recovery of locomotor activity to 50±10% of control and promoted de novo phasic descending inhibition of TA noxious reflex activity to 47±5% following non-invasive electrical conditioning stimulation applied above the iSCI. Spinal L4–L5 immunohistochemistry demonstrated a unique increase in serotonin fibre innervation up to 4.2±1.1 and 2.3±0.3 fold within the dorsal and ventral horn respectively with Alb-OA treatment when compared to uninjured tissue, in addition to a reduction in NR1 NMDA receptor phosphorylation and microglia reactivity. Early recovery of voluntary motor function accompanied with tonic and de novo phasic descending inhibition of nociceptive TA flexor reflex activity following Alb-OA treatment, mediated via known endogenous spinal mechanisms of action, suggests a clinical application of this novel neurotrophic factor for the treatment of paralysis, spasticity and pain

    Práticas de regulação das aprendizagens de estagiários do 1º ciclo do ensino básico de Portugal

    Get PDF
    O estudo sobre as práticas de regulação das aprendizagens de estagiários do 1º ciclo do ensino básico permitiu-nos concluir que, resultante da prática da avaliação formativa contínua, a regulação incide, sobretudo, nas dificuldades de aprendizagem dos alunos. Utilizam estratégias de regulação corretivas, mas também, de regulação interativa. Mais condicionadas foram as estratégias de regulação dos diferentes ritmos de trabalho e de aprendizagem dos alunos

    A rapid alkaline extraction procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA

    No full text

    Meditaciones para educadores

    No full text

    Type I interferons: expression and signalization

    No full text
    Type I interferon (IFN-A and IFN-B) genes encode a large family of multifunctional secreted proteins involved in antiviral defence, cell growth regulation and immune activation. These cytokines, as a consequence of their biological activities, have been established as effective therapeutic molecules for malignant and viral diseases. Virus infection is the main inducer leading to transient expression of type I IFN (A and B) and the antiviral response appears to proceed through a two-step pathway requiring, first, induction of type I IFN gene expression and, second, transcriptional activation by the synthesized IFN proteins, binding to their specific cell surface receptors, of a large number of genes. The proteins they encode are responsible, in part, for the pleiotropic multiple biological activities of the IFN. In this two-step pathway, the virus-induced IFN genes and the IFN-stimulated gene (ISG) expression seem to share common factors. Even if IFN-A genes are structurally related and very often coordinately induced in virus-infected cells, differences in the expression of the individual IFN-A messenger RNAs of the multigenic IFN-A gene family are observed in human as well as in murine cells, reflecting, in a particular cell type, the transcriptional activity of the corresponding promoter regions. Important studies on interferon regulatory factors and ISG factors have been made in the last decade. However, some factors involved in IFN-A gene regulation remain to be identified. Our goal has been to review the factors involved in the control of the type I IFN gene expression to understand the mechanisms of induction and repression of their transcription and to explain the properties of these cytokines through their signal transduction pathway
    corecore