Ternary combination of irinotecan, fluorouracil-folinic acid and oxaliplatin: results on human colon cancer cell lines

A marked antitumour efficacy is currently obtained by oxaliplatin (LOHP)–fluorouracil (FU)–folinic acid (FA) combination and by CPT11–FU–FA combination. Logically, the triple association LOHP, CPT11 and FUFA will be soon tested in cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to compare two schedules combining SN38 (the active metabolite of CPT11, irinotecan) with FU–FA and LOHP. The two schedules differed by the SN38 position. The relative contribution of each drug in the resulting global cytotoxicity was evaluated. Two human colon cancer cell lines were used (WIDR and SW620 both p53 mutated). LOHP plus FA were applied for 2 h, just before a 48 h FU exposure. The SN38 sequence was applied for 24 h, starting either 48 h before LOHP-FA (schedule A), or just after LOHP-FA exposure (schedule B). Cytotoxicity was assessed by the 3-(4,5-demethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) test and drug interactions were analysed according to the Chou and Talalay method, based on the computation of a combination index (CI). The SN38 position significantly induces a shift from additivity-antagonism when SN38 was applied after LOHP, towards additivity-synergism when SN38 was applied first (P = 0.03). The relative contribution (RC) of each drug in the overall cytotoxicity of the triple combination was defined as the drug concentration giving 50% cell lethality (IC 50) of the double association without that drug divided by the IC 50 of the triple association. Whatever the SN38 position, the larger contribution was made by LOHP (median RC = 2.4) and the smaller by SN38 (median RC = 1.1). In addition, the contribution of FUFA was improved when SN38 was applied first (median RC = 2.2) as compared to the opposite schedule (median RC = 1.2). Results were in agreement between the two explored cell lines. The present data should be taken into account when establishing the rationale of future trials combining CPT11, LOHP and FU–FA. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.co

Impact of thymidine phosphorylase surexpression on fluoropyrimidine activity and on tumour angiogenesis

Tumoral thymidine phosphorylase (TP) appears to play a dual role by being involved in neoangiogenesis and by activating 5FU prodrugs at the tumoral target site. The aim of the study was to investigate more thoroughly these potential physiological and pharmacological roles of TP. A rat carcinoma cell line (PROb) was transfected with TP/PD-ECGF in order to study the effect of the overexpression of this enzyme (1) on the sensitivity of cells to 5′DFUR and 5FU in vitro and (2) on tumour growth in vivo by using a syngenic tumour model in the BDIX rat (hepatic tumours, sub-cutaneous tumours). Cytotoxic effects of 5′DFUR, and to a lesser extent those of 5FU, were enhanced in TP clones as compared to control cells: there was a highly significant correlation between TP activity and in vitro sensitivity to 5’DFUR (r2= 0.91, P = 0.0002, n = 8) and, to a lesser extent, to 5FU (r2= 0.49, P = 0.053, n = 8). The impact of TP transfection on tumour growth was relatively modest and concerned only the initial stages of tumour expansion. Staining of TP tumours for endothelial (factor VIII) cells was always higher than controls. The staining ratio (TP/controls) tended to be reduced as tumours increased in size. The stability of TP expression was checked both in vitro (TP activity measurement) and in vivo (RT-PCR determinations) and there was no loss of TP expression over time which could be advanced to explain the progressive weakening of the impact of TP overexpression on both tumour growth and neoangiogenesis. © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign http://www.bjcancer.co

Resolution of Biphasic Binding of the Opioid Antagonist Naltrexone in Brain Membranes

In synaptosomal membranes from rat brain cortex, in the presence of 150 m M NaC1, the opioid antagonist [ 3 H] naltrexone bound to two populations of receptor sites with affinities of 0.27 and 4.3 n M , respectively. Guanosine-5′-(3-thiotriphosphate) had little modulating effect and did not alter the biphasic nature of ligand binding. On the other hand, receptor-selective opioids differentially inhibited the two binding components of [ 3 H] naltrexone. As shown by nonlinear least-squares analysis, the Μ opioids Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-(Me)Phe-Gly-ol or sufentanil abolished high-affinity [ 3 H] naltrexone binding, whereas the Δ-selective ligands [D- Pen 2 , D-Pen 5 ] enkephalin, ICI 174, 864, and oxymorphindole inhibited and eventually eliminated the low-affinity component in a concentration-dependent manner. These results indicate that, in contrast to the guanine nucleotide-sensitive biphasic binding of opioid-alkaloid agonists, the heterogeneity of naltrexone binding in brain membranes reflects ligand interaction with different opioid-receptor types.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/66340/1/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08288.x.pd