The Adaptation of German Accounting Rules to IFRS: A Legislative Balancing Act

The accounting strategy of the EU Commission for the last ten years, which reached one of its goals with the Regulation on IAS, is challenging all EU Member States. This article gives an analytical insight into the way the German legislator has confronted this challenge. It explains the statutory changes introduced to adapt the accounting regime in Germany, against the background of arguments for reform and proposals which have been put forward in the German accounting literature and by influential interest groups. The major characteristics of the government's accounting strategy are analysed: an increasing focus on the macroeconomic benefits of adequate accounting regulations, a perception of accounting as a material part of the corporate governance regime, greater weight given to the notion of public interest and the information function of accounting, a focus on consolidated accounts for the revision of existing rules, and, at the same time, considerable reluctance to change any recognition and measurement rules for individual entity accounts. In general the accounting reform strategy of the German government can be characterized as being slow, conservative and reactive, following a marginal step-by-step approach

Auditing in Britain and Germany compared: professions, knowledge and the state

In an attempt to move away from dichotomous expositions of state-run Germany and self-regulated Britain this paper seeks to analyse the regulation of auditing in terms of a state-profession axis (Hopwood, 1988: 559) that shifts over time. Stereotypical beliefs of Britain and Germany representing diametrically opposite systems of regulation can be contradicted in the light of increasing state involvement in Britain and the recognition that the German system is not adequately characterized by rigid and exhaustive codification, but relies to a significant degree on professional expertise. However, differences do exist, especially in the nature of regulation, which takes an informal shape in Britain, and in the production and diffusion of knowledge where academics and preparers are much more involved in Germany. The case of auditor independence illustrates some of the similarities and differences exposed by an analysis that aims to interpret regulatory systems in their national and historical context rather than producing simplistic general models.