6 research outputs found
Giving Back: A mixed methods study of the contributions of US-Based Nigerian physicians to home country health systems
Background: There is increased interest in the capacity of US immigrants to contribute to their homelands via entrepreneurship and philanthropy. However, there has been little research examining how immigrant physicians may support health systems and what factors facilitate or raise barriers to increased support. Methods: This study used an observational design with paper questionnaire and interview components. Our sample was drawn from attendees of a 2011 conference for US Based Nigerian physicians respondents who were not US residents, physicians, and of Nigerian birth or parentage were excluded from further analysis. Respondents were randomly selected to complete a follow-up interview with separate scripts for those having made past financial contributions or medical service trips to support Nigerian healthcare (Group A) and those who had done neither (Group B). Survey results were analyzed using Fischer exact tests and interviews were coded in pairs using thematic content analysis. Results: Seventy-five of 156 (48%) individuals who attended the conference met inclusion criteria and completed the survey, and 13 follow-up interviews were completed. In surveys, 65% percent of respondents indicated a donation to an agency providing healthcare in Nigeria the previous year, 57% indicated having gone on medical service trips in the prior 10years and 45% indicated it was "very likely" or "likely" that they would return to Nigeria to practice medicine. In interviews, respondents tended to favor gifts in kind and financial gifts as modes of contribution, with medical education facilities as the most popular target. Personal connections, often forged in medical school, tended to facilitate contributions. Individuals desiring to return permanently focused on their potential impact and worried about health system under-preparedness those not desiring permanent return centered on how safety, financial security and health systems issues presented barriers. Conclusions: This study demonstrates several mechanisms by which health systems may benefit from expatriate engagement. Greater identification of reliable local partners for diaspora, deeper collaboration with those partners and a focus on sustainable interventions might improve the quantity and impact of contributions. Ethnic medical associations have a unique role in organizing and facilitating diaspora response. Public-private partnerships may help diaspora negotiate the challenges of repatriation
The diaspora health network: A new mechanism of mobilizing foreign US-based health professionals for international health
Diaspora-driven efforts to build biomedical research capacity in low and middle-income countries: A pilot program in India
Giving back: A mixed methods observational study of the contributions of US-based Nigerian physicians to their home country
Socialization, legitimation and the transfer of biomedical knowledge to low- and middle-income countries: analyzing the case of emergency medicine in India
BACKGROUND: Medical specialization is a key feature of biomedicine, and is a growing, but weakly understood
aspect of health systems in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), including India. Emergency medicine
is an example of a medical specialty that has been promoted in India by several high-income country stakeholders,
including the Indian diaspora, through transnational and institutional partnerships. Despite the rapid evolution of
emergency medicine in comparison to other specialties, this specialty has seen fragmentation in the stakeholder
network and divergent training and policy objectives. Few empirical studies have examined the influence of
stakeholders from high-income countries broadly, or of diasporas specifically, in transferring knowledge of medical
specialization to LMICs. Using the concepts of socialization and legitimation, our goal is to examine the transfer of
medical knowledge from high-income countries to LMICs through domestic, diasporic and foreign stakeholders,
and the perceived impact of this knowledge on shaping health priorities in India.
METHODS: This analysis was conducted as part of a broader study on the development of emergency medicine in
India. We designed a qualitative case study focused on the early 1990s until 2015, analyzing data from in-depth
interviewing (n = 87), document review (n = 248), and non-participant observation of conferences and meetings
(n = 6).
RESULTS: From the early 1990s, domestic stakeholders with exposure to emergency medicine in high-income
countries began to establish Emergency Departments and initiate specialist training in the field. Their efforts were
amplified by the active legitimation of emergency medicine by diasporic and foreign stakeholders, who formed
transnational partnerships with domestic stakeholders and organized conferences, training programs and other
activities to promote the field in India. However, despite a broad commitment to expanding specialist training, the
network of domestic, diasporic and foreign stakeholders was highly fragmented, resulting in myriad unstandardized
postgraduate training programs and duplicative policy agendas. Further, the focus in this time period was largely
on training specialists, resulting in more emphasis on a medicalized, tertiary-level form of care.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis reveals the complexities of the roles and dynamics of domestic, diasporic and foreign
stakeholders in the evolution of emergency medicine in India. More research and critical analyses are required to
explore the transfer of medical knowledge, such as other medical specialties, models of clinical care, and medical
technologies, from high-income countries to India