11 research outputs found

    Clustering of cancer among families of cases with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), Multiple Myeloma (MM), Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) and control subjects

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>A positive family history of chronic diseases including cancer can be used as an index of genetic and shared environmental influences. The tumours studied have several putative risk factors in common including occupational exposure to certain pesticides and a positive family history of cancer.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted population-based studies of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), Multiple Myeloma (MM), non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), and Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) among male incident case and control subjects in six Canadian provinces. The postal questionnaire was used to collect personal demographic data, a medical history, a lifetime occupational history, smoking pattern, and the information on family history of cancer. The family history of cancer was restricted to first degree relatives and included relationship to the index subjects and the types of tumours diagnosed among relatives. The information was collected on 1528 cases (HL (n = 316), MM (n = 342), NHL (n = 513), STS (n = 357)) and 1506 age ± 2 years and province of residence matched control subjects. Conditional logistic regression analyses adjusted for the matching variables were conducted.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We found that most families were cancer free, and a minority included two or more affected relatives. HL [(OR<sub>adj </sub>(95% CI) <b>1.79 (1.33, 2.42)]</b>, MM <b>(1.38(1.07, 1.78))</b>, NHL <b>(1.43 (1.15, 1.77)</b>), and STS cases <b>(1.30(1.00, 1.68)) </b>had higher incidence of cancer if any first degree relative was affected with cancer compared to control families. Constructing mutually exclusive categories combining "family history of cancer" (yes, no) and "pesticide exposure ≥10 hours per year" (yes, no) indicated that a positive family history was important for HL <b>(2.25(1.61, 3.15))</b>, and for the combination of the two exposures increased risk for MM <b>(1.69(1.14,2.51))</b>. Also, a positive family history of cancer both with <b>(1.72 (1.21, 2.45)) </b>and without pesticide exposure <b>(1.43(1.12, 1.83)) </b>increased risk of NHL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>HL, MM, NHL, and STS cases had higher incidence of cancer if any first degree relative affected with cancer compared to control families. A positive family history of cancer and/or shared environmental exposure to agricultural chemicals play an important role in the development of cancer.</p

    Introduction

    No full text

    Effects of hormonal replacement therapy on plasma sex hormone-binding globulin, androgen and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in postmenopausal women

    No full text
    Plasma sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels are important in the regulation of plasma free and albumin-bound androgens and estrogens. In postmenopausal women associated to the decrease of estrogen production, a decrease of plasma SHBG levels occurs. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women modulates plasma SHBG levels, in relationship with the different regimens and routes of administration. The present study aimed to compare the effect of different HRT on plasma SHBG levels in relationship with the changes of plasma androgen [dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS), testosterone (T), androstenedione (A)] and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels. In a retrospective study 443 postmenopausal women were studied and divided into 2 groups, The group 1 (n=170) was subdivided in 4 groups of women as follows: A) treated with transdermal 17-beta estradiol + medroxyprogesterone acetate, B) treated with oral conjugated estrogens, C) treated with sequential HRT (estradiol valerate (EV) + norgestrel), and D) treated with a combined HRT (micronized estradiol (E(2)) + noretisterone acetate). Women of group 2 (n=273) did not receive HRT and served as controls. All groups of women treated with different HRT showed plasma estradiol levels significantly higher than controls (p&lt;0.01), showing the highest values in women treated with oral HRT. Plasma SHBG levels were not significantly different between patients treated with transdermal 17-beta estradiol + medroxyprogesterone acetate and controls. On the other hand, all the groups of patients treated with oral conjugated estrogen with or without progestagens showed plasma SHBG levels significantly higher than controls (p&lt;0.01). Plasma SHBG levels were higher in the group treated with estrogen alone than in groups of women treated with sequential or combined HRT. Plasma DHEAS, T and A levels in patients treated with different HRT regimens were in the same range of levels as control women. Plasma IGF-1 levels were not significantly affected by the various HRT regimens and remained in the same range as controls, In conclusion, plasma SHBG levels increase following oral HRT while are not affected by transdermal HRT, Plasma IGF-1 and androgen levels are not influenced from oral or transdermal HR
    corecore