5 research outputs found

    Effectiveness of norfloxacin and ofloxacin for treatment of gonorrhoea and decrease of in vitro susceptibility to quinolones over time in Rwanda.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE--To study the effectiveness of single-dose norfloxacin and ofloxacin in the treatment of gonococcal urethritis in men, and to monitor in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility to these antibiotics over time. SETTING--Centre Médico-Social de Bilyogo, Kigali, Rwanda. The only clinic in Rwanda using quinolones for the treatment of gonorrhoea. METHODS--As part of a monitoring programme, men with gonococcal urethritis were evaluated after treatment with norfloxacin (800 mg) in 1986 and 1987, and after treatment with ofloxacin (400 mg) in 1989. RESULTS--Neisseria gonorrhoeae was eradicated from the urethra from 96.0% (189/197) and from 97.1% (166/171) men treated with norfloxacin and ofloxacin, respectively. Overall 38.2% of the pretreatment isolates produced penicillinase (PPNG isolates) and 20.4% (44/216) of the tested non-PPNG isolates were chromosomally resistant to penicillin (MIC > or = 2.0 mg/l). Resistance to tetracycline and thiamphenicol was common in both PPNG and non-PPNG and increased considerably in 1989. All isolates were susceptible to kanamycin, spectinomycin, ceftiaxone, norfloxacin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. However, a higher number of isolates recovered in 1989 showed decreased susceptibility to the quinolones. Treatment failure occurred more often in subjects with isolates having MIC values > or = 0.06 mg/L of norfloxacin (p = 0.006). Seven out of 13 patients who did not respond to therapy had no signs nor symptoms of urethritis. CONCLUSION--Quinolone antibiotics are now indicated as a first line treatment of gonorrhoea in countries with a problem of antimicrobial multiresistance. However, antimicrobial susceptibility to the quinolones may decrease rapidly, and close monitoring of the in vitro susceptibility of N gonorrhoeae and the clinical effectiveness of the antibiotics is imperative

    Simple algorithms for the management of genital ulcers: evaluation in a primary health care centre in Kigali, Rwanda.

    No full text
    A cross-sectional study was conducted among 395 patients presenting with genital ulcers at a primary health care centre in Kigali, Rwanda. Using clinical data and the results of a rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, we simulated the diagnostic outcome of two simple WHO flowcharts for the management of genital ulcers. These outcomes and a clinical diagnosis were then compared with the laboratory diagnosis based on culture for genital herpes and Haemophilus ducreyi and serology for syphilis. The prevalence of HIV infection was high (73%) but there was no difference between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients in the clinical presentation and etiology of genital ulcer disease. The proportion of correctly managed chancroid and/or syphilis cases was 99% using a syndromic approach, 82.1% using a hierarchical algorithm including an RPR test, and 38.3% with a clinical diagnosis. In situations where no laboratory support is available, a simple syndromic approach is preferable to the clinical approach for the management of genital ulcer. If an RPR test can be included in the diagnostic strategy, patients with a reactive RPR test should be treated for both syphilis and chancroid infection
    corecore