5 research outputs found

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis of the Acetylation Pattern of the Neuronal Tau Protein

    No full text
    Lysine acetylation of the neuronal Tau protein was described as a novel mechanism of posttranslational regulation of Tau functions with important outcomes in microtubule binding and aggregation processes related to Alzheimer’s disease. Here, we unravel at a per-residue resolution the acetylation pattern of full-length Tau by the Creb-binding protein (CBP) acetyltransferase using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Our study gives a quantitative overview of CBP-mediated acetylation and examines the catalytic proficiency because the nonenzymatic reaction with acetyl-coenzyme A occurs <i>in vitro</i>. Furthermore, we have investigated with this characterized acetylated Tau the effect of acetylation on Tau fibrillization in a heparin-induced aggregation assay and on heparin binding

    Mechanism of Tau-Promoted Microtubule Assembly As Probed by NMR Spectroscopy

    No full text
    Determining the molecular mechanism of the neuronal Tau protein in the tubulin heterodimer assembly has been a challenge owing to the dynamic character of the complex and the large size of microtubules. We use here defined constructs comprising one or two tubulin heterodimers to characterize their association with a functional fragment of Tau, named TauF4. TauF4 binds with high affinities to the tubulin heterodimer complexes, but NMR spectroscopy shows that it remains highly dynamic, partly because of the interaction with the acidic C-terminal tails of the tubulin monomers. When bound to a single tubulin heterodimer, TauF4 is characterized by an overhanging peptide corresponding to the first of the four microtubule binding repeats of Tau. This peptide becomes immobilized in the complex with two longitudinally associated tubulin heterodimers. The longitudinal associations are favored by the fragment and contribute to Tau’s functional role in microtubule assembly

    Inhibition of 14-3-3/Tau by Hybrid Small-Molecule Peptides Operating via Two Different Binding Modes

    Get PDF
    Current molecular hypotheses have not yet delivered marketable treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), arguably due to a lack of understanding of AD biology and an overreliance on conventional drug modalities. Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are emerging drug targets, which show promise for the treatment of, e.g., cancer, but are still underexploited for treating neurodegenerative diseases. 14-3-3 binding to phosphorylated Tau is a promising PPI drug target based on its reported destabilizing effect on microtubules, leading to enhanced neurofibrillary tangle formation as a potential cause of AD-related neurodegeneration. Inhibition of 14-3-3/Tau may therefore be neuroprotective. Previously, we reported the structure-guided development of modified peptide inhibitors of 14-3-3/Tau. Here, we report further efforts to optimize the binding mode and activity of our modified Tau peptides through a combination of chemical synthesis, biochemical assays, and X-ray crystallography. Most notably, we were able to characterize two different high-affinity binding modes, both of which inhibited 14-3-3-binding to full-length PKA-phosphorylated Tau protein in vitro as measured by NMR spectroscopy. Our findings, besides producing useful tool inhibitor compounds for studying 14-3-3/Tau, have enhanced our understanding of the molecular parameters for inhibiting 14-3-3/Tau, which are important milestones toward the establishment of our 14-3-3 PPI hypothesis

    A ÎČ‑Turn Motif in the Steroid Hormone Receptor’s Ligand-Binding Domains Interacts with the Peptidyl-prolyl Isomerase (PPIase) Catalytic Site of the Immunophilin FKBP52

    No full text
    The immunophilin FKBP52 interacts with nuclear steroid hormone receptors. Studying the crystal structure of human estrogen receptor α (hERα) and using nuclear magnetic resonance, we show here that the short V<sup>364</sup>PGF<sup>367</sup> sequence, which is located within its ligand-binding domain and adopts a type II ÎČ-turn conformation in the protein, binds the peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase or rotamase) FK1 domain of FKBP52. Interestingly, this turn motif displays strong similarities with the FKBP52 FK1 domain-binding moiety of macrolide immunomodulators such as rapamycin and GPI-1046, an immunophilin ligand with neuroprotective characteristics. An increase in the hydrophobicity of the residue preceding the proline and cyclization of the VPGF peptide strengthen its recognition by the FK1 domain of FKBP52. Replacement of the Pro residue with a dimethylproline also enhances this interaction. Our study not only contributes to a better understanding of how the interaction between the FK1 domain of FKBP52 and steroid hormone receptors most likely works but also opens new avenues for the synthesis of FKBP52 FK1 peptide ligands appropriate for the control of hormone-dependent physiological mechanisms or of the functioning of the Tau protein. Indeed, it has been shown that FKBP52 is involved in the intraneuronal dynamics of the Tau protein

    Adoption of a Turn Conformation Drives the Binding Affinity of p53 C-Terminal Domain Peptides to 14-3-3σ

    Get PDF
    The interaction between the adapter protein 14-3-3σ and transcription factor p53 is important for preserving the tumor-suppressor functions of p53 in the cell. A phosphorylated motif within the C-terminal domain (CTD) of p53 is key for binding to the amphipathic groove of 14-3-3. This motif is unique among 14-3-3 binding partners, and the precise dynamics of the interaction is not yet fully understood. Here, we investigate this interaction at the molecular level by analyzing the binding of different length p53 CTD peptides to 14-3-3σ using ITC, SPR, NMR, and MD simulations. We observed that the propensity of the p53 peptide to adopt turn-like conformation plays an important role in the binding to the 14-3-3σ protein. Our study contributes to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the 14-3-3-p53 binding and provides useful insight into how conformation properties of a ligand influence protein binding
    corecore