9 research outputs found

    Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: a randomized comparative trial

    Get PDF
    Background. Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly

    Effect of emergency start and central venous catheter on outcomes in incident hemodialysis patients: a prospective observational cohort

    No full text
    International audienceBackground: Unfavorable conditions at hemodialysis inception reduce the survival rate. However, the relative contribution to outcomes of predialysis follow-up, symptoms, emergency start or central venous catheter (CVC) is unknown.Methods: We analyzed the determinants of survival according to dialysis initiation conditions in the nationwide REIN registry, using two methods based either on clinical classification or data mining. We divided patients into four groups according to dialysis initiation (emergency vs planned, symptoms or not, previous follow-up). "Followed planned starters" began dialysis as outpatients and with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). "Followed symptomatic non-urgent starters" were patients who started earlier because of any non-urgent symptomatic event. "Followed urgent starters" had seen a nephrologist before inception but started dialysis in an emergency condition. "Unknown urgent starters" were patients without any follow-up and who had a CVC at inception.Results: "Followed urgent" starters had the lowest 2-year survival rate (66.8%) compared to "followed planned" (77.3%), "followed symptomatic non urgent" (79.2%), and "unknown urgent" (71.7%). Compared to other groups, the risk of mortality was lower in followed symptomatic non urgent (HR 0.86 95% CI 0.75-0.99) and higher in followed urgent starters (HR 1.05 (95% CI 0.94-1.18). In data mining Classification And Regression Tree regrouping in five categories, the lowest 2-year survival (52.3%) was in over 70-year-old starters with a CVC. The survival was 93.2% in under 57-year-old patients without active cancer, 82.5% in 57-70-year-old individuals without cancer, 72.4% in over 70-year-old patients without CVC and 61.4% in under 70-year-old subjects with cancer. The hazard ratio of data mining categories varied between 2.12 (95% CI 1.73-2.60) in 57-70-year-old subjects without cancer and 4.42 (95% CI 3.64-5.37) in over 70-year-old patients with CVC. Therefore, regrouping incident patients into five data mining categories, identified by age, cancer, and CVC use, could discriminate the 2-year survival in patients starting hemodialysis.Conclusions: Although each classification captured different prognosis information, both analyses showed that starting hemodialysis on a CVC has more dramatic outcomes than emergency start per se

    [Prevalence of iron deficiency in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease: The CARENFER national, multicentre, observational study].

    No full text
    International audienceINTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency is common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. We performed a national, multicentre, observational and transversal study to assess the prevalence of iron deficiency as well as current iron deficiency screening practices in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 25~nephrology centres in France participated in the study. All adult non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients who met the inclusion (GFR>15mL/min/1.73m(2)) and exclusion criteria and provided consent were systematically recruited over a 4-week inclusion period. Investigators were asked to perform a blood test (hemoglobin concentration, serum iron, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation) and to complete a questionnaire about their iron status monitoring practices. The primary objective was to assess the prevalence of iron deficiency (serum ferritin<100μg/L and/or transferrin saturation<20%). Secondary objectives were to evaluate the prevalence of absolute iron deficiency (serum ferritin<100μg/L and transferrin saturation<20%) and functional iron deficiency (serum ferritin≥q100μg/L and transferrin saturation<20%), the prevalence of iron deficiency according to haemoglobin concentration and chronic kidney disease stage, the proportion of centres that perform routine evaluation of iron status and the number of patients receiving iron supplementation. RESULTS: A total of 1211~patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease were included in the analysis. The overall prevalence of iron deficiency was 47.1%. The rates of absolute iron deficiency and functional iron deficiency and anaemia were 13.4% and 17.1%, respectively. Among the 25~participating centres, 12~reported routine assessment of iron status in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. CONCLUSION: In this observational study, a high prevalence of iron deficiency was observed among non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Less than half of participating centres reported routine assessment of iron status

    FC: Maintenance treatment of renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta versus darbepoetin alfa administered monthly: A randomized comparative trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant [Epub ahead of print] doi

    No full text
    Abstract Background. Several studies with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents claim that maintenance therapy of renal anaemia may be possible at extended dosing intervals; however, few studies were randomized, results varied, and comparisons between agents were absent. We report results of a multi-national, randomized, prospective trial comparing haemoglobin maintenance with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly. Methods. Haemodialysis patients (n = 490) on stable onceweekly intravenous darbepoetin alfa were randomized to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta once monthly or darbepoetin alfa every 2 weeks for 26 weeks, with dose adjustment for individual haemoglobin target (11-13 g/dL; maximum decrease from baseline 1 g/dL). Subsequently, patients entered a second 26-week period of once-monthly methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and darbepoetin alfa. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who maintained average haemoglobin ≥10.5 g/dL, with a decrease from baseline ≤1 g/dL, in Weeks 50-53; the secondary endpoint was dose change over time. The trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00394953. Results. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One hundred and fifty-seven of 245 patients treated with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 99 of 245 patients with darbepoetin alfa met the response definition (64.1% and 40.4%; P&lt;0.0001). Doses increased by 6.8% with methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta and 58.8% with darbepoetin alfa during once-monthly treatment. Death rates were equal between treatments (5.7%). Most common adverse events included hypertension, procedural hypotension, nasopharyngitis and muscle spasms, with no differences between groups. Conclusions. Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta maintained target haemoglobin more successfully than darbepoetin alfa at once-monthly dosing intervals despite dose increases with darbepoetin alfa

    Risk factors for severity of COVID-19 in chronic dialysis patients from a multicentre French cohort

    No full text
    International audienceAbstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease, related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Few data are available in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods We conducted an observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients at 11 dialysis centres in two distinct districts of France to examine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in this population, and to determine risk factors of disease severity (defined as a composite outcome including intensive care unit admission or death) and mortality. Results Among the 2336 patients enrolled, 5.5% had confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Of the 122 patients with a follow-up superior to 28 days, 37% reached the composite outcome and 28% died. Multivariate analysis showed that oxygen therapy on diagnosis and a decrease in lymphocyte count were independent risk factors associated with disease severity and with mortality. Chronic use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (18% of patients) was associated with a protective effect on mortality. Treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine (AZT/HCQ) (46% of patients) were not associated with the composite outcome and with death in univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions COVID-19 is a severe disease with poor prognosis in patients with ESRD. Usual treatment with ARBs seems to be protective of critical evolution and mortality. There is no evidence of clinical benefit with the combination of AZT/HCQ

    Low incidence of SARS-CoV-2, risk factors of mortality and the course of illness in the French national cohort of dialysis patients

    No full text
    International audienceThe aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of COVID-19 disease in the French national population of dialysis patients, their course of illness and to identify the risk factors associated with mortality. Our study included all patients on dialysis recorded in the French REIN Registry in April 2020. Clinical characteristics at last follow-up and the evolution of COVID-19 illness severity over time were recorded for diagnosed cases (either suspicious clinical symptoms, characteristic signs on the chest scan or a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction) for SARS-CoV-2. A total of 1,621 infected patients were reported on the REIN registry from March 16th, 2020 to May 4th, 2020. Of these, 344 died. The prevalence of COVID-19 patients varied from less than 1% to 10% between regions. The probability of being a case was higher in males, patients with diabetes, those in need of assistance for transfer or treated at a self-care unit. Dialysis at home was associated with a lower probability of being infected as was being a smoker, a former smoker, having an active malignancy, or peripheral vascular disease. Mortality in diagnosed cases (21%) was associated with the same causes as in the general population. Higher age, hypoalbuminemia and the presence of an ischemic heart disease were statistically independently associated with a higher risk of death. Being treated at a selfcare unit was associated with a lower risk. Thus, our study showed a relatively low frequency of COVID-19 among dialysis patients contrary to what might have been assumed

    Low incidence of SARS-CoV-2, risk factors of mortality and the course of illness in the French national cohort of dialysis patients

    No full text
    corecore