31 research outputs found

    All polytopes are coset geometries: characterizing automorphism groups of k-orbit abstract polytopes

    Full text link
    Abstract polytopes generalize the classical notion of convex polytopes to more general combinatorial structures. The most studied ones are regular and chiral polytopes, as it is well-known, they can be constructed as coset geometries from their automorphism groups. This is also known to be true for 2- and 3- orbit 3-polytopes. In this paper we show that every abstract nn-polytope can be constructed as a coset geometry. This construction is done by giving a characterization, in terms of generators, relations and intersection conditions, of the automorphism group of a kk-orbit polytope with given symmetry type graph. Furthermore, we use these results to show that for all k≠2k\neq 2, there exist kk-orbit nn-polytopes with Boolean automorphism groups, for all n≥3n\geq 3.Comment: 41 pages, 6 figure

    Sparse groups need not be semisparse

    Full text link
    In 1999 Michael Hartley showed that any abstract polytope can be constructed as a double coset poset, by means of a C-group \C and a subgroup N \leq \C. Subgroups N \leq \C that give rise to abstract polytopes through such construction are called {\em sparse}. If, further, the stabilizer of a base flag of the poset is precisely NN, then NN is said to be {\em semisparse}. In \cite[Conjecture 5.2]{hartley1999more} Hartley conjectures that sparse groups are always semisparse. In this paper, we show that this conjecture is in fact false: there exist sparse groups that are not semisparse. In particular, we show that such groups are always obtained from non-faithful maniplexes that give rise to polytopes. Using this, we show that Hartely's conjecture holds for rank 3, but we construct examples to disprove the conjecture for all ranks n≥4n\geq 4

    A characterization of triangulations of closed surfaces

    Full text link
    In this paper we prove that a finite triangulation of a connected closed surface is completely determined by its intersection matrix. The \emph{intersection matrix} of a finite triangulation, KK, is defined as MK=(dim(si∩sj))0≤i,0≤jn−1M_{K}=(dim(s_{i}\cap s_{j}))_{0\leq i,0\leq j}^{n-1}, where K2={s0,…sn−1}K_{2}=\{s_{0}, \ldots s_{n-1}\} is a labelling of the triangles of KK.Comment: Submitted to EUROCOMB 201
    corecore