'It's a nightmare': informed consent in paediatric genome-wide sequencing. A qualitative expert interview study from Germany and Switzerland.

The use of genome-wide sequencing (GWS) in paediatrics has added complexity to informed consent (IC) and pretest counselling because of the vast number and interpretation of potential findings, and their implications. However, empirical data from continental Europe on these issues remains limited. This study therefore aimed to explore the experiences and views of medical geneticists working with children in Germany and Switzerland regarding the challenges of obtaining valid IC in paediatric GWS. Qualitative interviews with 20 medical geneticists were analysed employing reflexive thematic analysis. In the interviews, many medical geneticists questioned the validity of parents' IC due to the enormous amount of relevant information given and the variety and complexity of the possible test outcomes. Key barriers identified included familial implications, administrative challenges and struggles with non-directiveness. Medical geneticists' suggestions for improvement included increasing the number of genetics professionals and better information material, which is crucial as GWS becomes a diagnostic standard in the early care pathways of children. An adjustment of aspirations from still existing ideal of traditional fully IC to appropriate IC seems to be needed. Such a more realistic and ethically sound adaptation of the requirements for IC can lead to better 'informedness' and improve the validity of the consent. This might also help reduce the moral distress for the medical geneticists involved

‘It’s a nightmare’: informed consent in paediatric genome-wide sequencing. A qualitative expert interview study from Germany and Switzerland

The use of genome-wide sequencing (GWS) in paediatrics has added complexity to informed consent (IC) and pretest counselling because of the vast number and interpretation of potential findings, and their implications. However, empirical data from continental Europe on these issues remains limited. This study therefore aimed to explore the experiences and views of medical geneticists working with children in Germany and Switzerland regarding the challenges of obtaining valid IC in paediatric GWS. Qualitative interviews with 20 medical geneticists were analysed employing reflexive thematic analysis. In the interviews, many medical geneticists questioned the validity of parents’ IC due to the enormous amount of relevant information given and the variety and complexity of the possible test outcomes. Key barriers identified included familial implications, administrative challenges and struggles with non-directiveness. Medical geneticists’ suggestions for improvement included increasing the number of genetics professionals and better information material, which is crucial as GWS becomes a diagnostic standard in the early care pathways of children. An adjustment of aspirations from still existing ideal of traditional fully IC to appropriate IC seems to be needed. Such a more realistic and ethically sound adaptation of the requirements for IC can lead to better ‘informedness’ and improve the validity of the consent. This might also help reduce the moral distress for the medical geneticists involved

The full spectrum of ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing: a systematic qualitative review

Background The use of genome-wide sequencing in pediatric medicine and research is growing exponentially. While this has many potential benefits, the normative and empirical literature has highlighted various ethical issues. There have not been, however, any systematic reviews of these issues. The aim of this systematic review is to determine systematically the spectrum of ethical issues that is raised for stakeholders in in pediatric genome-wide sequencing. Methods A systematic review in PubMed and Google Books (publications in English or German between 2004 and 2021) was conducted. Further references were identified via reference screening. Data were analyzed and synthesized using qualitative content analysis. Ethical issues were defined as arising when a relevant normative principle is not adequately considered or when two principles come into conflict. Results Our literature search retrieved 3175 publications of which 143 were included in the analysis. Together these mentioned 106 ethical issues in pediatric genome-wide sequencing, categorized into five themes along the pediatric genome-wide sequencing lifecycle. Most ethical issues identified in relation to genome-wide sequencing typically reflect ethical issues that arise in general genetic testing, but they are often amplified by the increased quantity of data obtained, and associated uncertainties. The most frequently discussed ethical aspects concern the issue of unsolicited findings. Conclusion Concentration of the debate on unsolicited findings risks overlooking other ethical challenges. An overarching difficulty presents the terminological confusion: both with regard to both the test procedure/ the scope of analysis, as well as with the topic of unsolicited findings. It is important that the genetics and ethics communities together with other medical professions involved work jointly on specific case related guidelines to grant the maximum benefit for the care of the children, while preventing patient harm and disproportionate overload of clinicians and the healthcare system by the wealth of available options and economic incentives to increase testing

Prenatal phenotyping: A community effort to enhance the Human Phenotype Ontology

Human phenotype ontology; Prenatal diagnosis; Prenatal phenotypingOntología del fenotipo humano; Diagnóstico prenatal; Fenotipado prenatalOntologia del fenotip humà; Diagnòstic prenatal; Fenotipat prenatalTechnological advances in both genome sequencing and prenatal imaging are increasing our ability to accurately recognize and diagnose Mendelian conditions prenatally. Phenotype-driven early genetic diagnosis of fetal genetic disease can help to strategize treatment options and clinical preventive measures during the perinatal period, to plan in utero therapies, and to inform parental decision-making. Fetal phenotypes of genetic diseases are often unique and at present are not well understood; more comprehensive knowledge about prenatal phenotypes and computational resources have an enormous potential to improve diagnostics and translational research. The Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) has been widely used to support diagnostics and translational research in human genetics. To better support prenatal usage, the HPO consortium conducted a series of workshops with a group of domain experts in a variety of medical specialties, diagnostic techniques, as well as diseases and phenotypes related to prenatal medicine, including perinatal pathology, musculoskeletal anomalies, neurology, medical genetics, hydrops fetalis, craniofacial malformations, cardiology, neonatal-perinatal medicine, fetal medicine, placental pathology, prenatal imaging, and bioinformatics. We expanded the representation of prenatal phenotypes in HPO by adding 95 new phenotype terms under the Abnormality of prenatal development or birth (HP:0001197) grouping term, and revised definitions, synonyms, and disease annotations for most of the 152 terms that existed before the beginning of this effort. The expansion of prenatal phenotypes in HPO will support phenotype-driven prenatal exome and genome sequencing for precision genetic diagnostics of rare diseases to support prenatal care.European Commission; National Human Genome Research Institute; NIH Office of the Director; The European Union's EIT-Health Innovation Program bp2020-2022, Grant/Award Numbers: #211015, #20062; NIH Office of the Director (OD), the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Grant/Award Number: 779257; NHGRI, Grant/Award Numbers: 2R24OD011883-05A1, 1U24HG011449-01A

Genetische Beratung: Konzepte, Missverständnisse, Perspektiven

Genetische Beratung Die Medizinische Genetik hat sich von einem Randgebiet zu einer zentralen klinischen Disziplin in der Medizin entwickelt. Der enorme Wissenszuwachs der letzten Jahre zu Phänotypen und Genotypen, zu Ätiologie und Verlauf seltener und häufiger Krankheiten wirkt sich auf alle Fachbereiche der klinischen Medizin aus. Viele haben jedoch nur eine vage Vorstellung, was eine genetische Beratung beinhaltet. = Génétique Bien que marginale à ses débuts, la médecine génétique s’est développée en une discipline clinique essentielle. L’énorme croissance des connaissances de ces dernières années en ce qui concerne les phénotypes et génotypes ainsi que l’étiologie et l’évolution de maladies rares et fréquentes entraîne des répercussions sur toutes les spécialités de la médecine. Cependant, beaucoup n’ont qu’une vague idée de ce que devrait contenir un conseil génétique

Entwicklung der genetischen und genomischen Medizin in der Schweiz

Mit den rasanten technologischen Entwicklungen im medizinisch-genomischen Bereich und dem damit verbundenen exponentiellen Kenntniszuwachs hat der Bedarf an genetischer Expertise in praktisch allen medizinischen Disziplinen zugenommen. Die Schweizerische Gesellschaft für Medizinische Genetik (SGMG) sieht sich als Fachgesellschaft und Vertreterin einer transversalen medizinischen Disziplin besonders geeignet, die gegebene Situation zu evaluieren und zukünftige Konzepte zu entwickeln und zu begleiten

SwissGenVar: A Platform for Clinical-Grade Interpretation of Genetic Variants to Foster Personalized Healthcare in Switzerland.

Large-scale next-generation sequencing (NGS) germline testing is technically feasible today, but variant interpretation represents a major bottleneck in analysis workflows. This includes extensive variant prioritization, annotation, and time-consuming evidence curation. The scale of the interpretation problem is massive, and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are a challenge to personalized medicine. This challenge is further compounded by the complexity and heterogeneity of the standards used to describe genetic variants and the associated phenotypes when searching for relevant information to support clinical decision making. To address this, all five Swiss academic institutions for Medical Genetics joined forces with the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) to create SwissGenVar as a user-friendly nationwide repository and sharing platform for genetic variant data generated during routine diagnostic procedures and research sequencing projects. Its aim is to provide a protected environment for expert evidence sharing about individual variants to harmonize and upscale their significance interpretation at the clinical grade according to international standards. To corroborate the clinical assessment, the variant-related data will be combined with consented high-quality clinical information. Broader visibility will be achieved by interfacing with international databases, thus supporting global initiatives in personalized healthcare

SwissGenVar: A platform for clinical grade interpretation of genetic variants to foster personalized health care in Switzerland

Large-scale next-generation sequencing (NGS) germline testing is technically feasible today, but variant interpretation represents a major bottleneck in analysis workflows including the extensive variant prioritization, annotation, and time-consuming evidence curation. The scale of the interpretation problem is massive, and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are a challenge to personalized medicine. This challenge is further compounded by the complexity and heterogeneity of standards used to describe genetic variants and associated phenotypes when searching for relevant information to inform clinical decision-making. For this purpose, all five Swiss academic Medical Genetics Institutions joined forces with the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) to create SwissGenVar as a user-friendly nationwide repository and sharing platform for genetic variant data generated during routine diagnostic procedures and research sequencing projects. Its objective is to provide a protected environment for expert evidence sharing about individual variants to harmonize and up-scale their significance interpretation at clinical grade following international standards. To corroborate the clinical assessment, the variant-related data are combined with consented high-quality clinical information. Broader visibility will be gained by interfacing with international databases, thus supporting global initiatives in personalized health care

SwissGenVar: A Platform for Clinical-Grade Interpretation of Genetic Variants to Foster Personalized Healthcare in Switzerland

Large-scale next-generation sequencing (NGS) germline testing is technically feasible today, but variant interpretation represents a major bottleneck in analysis workflows. This includes extensive variant prioritization, annotation, and time-consuming evidence curation. The scale of the interpretation problem is massive, and variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) are a challenge to personalized medicine. This challenge is further compounded by the complexity and heterogeneity of the standards used to describe genetic variants and the associated phenotypes when searching for relevant information to support clinical decision making. To address this, all five Swiss academic institutions for Medical Genetics joined forces with the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) to create SwissGenVar as a user-friendly nationwide repository and sharing platform for genetic variant data generated during routine diagnostic procedures and research sequencing projects. Its aim is to provide a protected environment for expert evidence sharing about individual variants to harmonize and upscale their significance interpretation at the clinical grade according to international standards. To corroborate the clinical assessment, the variant-related data will be combined with consented high-quality clinical information. Broader visibility will be achieved by interfacing with international databases, thus supporting global initiatives in personalized healthcare