Coaching Community Health Volunteers in Integrated Community Case Management Improves the Care of Sick Children Under-5: Experience from Bondo, Kenya

Background: Shortages of healthcare workers is detrimental to the health of communities, especially children. This paper describes the process of capacity building Community Health Volunteers (CHVs) to deliver integrated preventive and curative package of care of services to manage common childhood illness in hard-to-reach communities in Bondo Subcounty, Kenya. Methods: A pre-test/post-test single-group design was used to assess changes in knowledge and skills related to integrated community case management (iCCM) among 58 Community Health Volunteers who received a six-day iCCM clinical training and an additional 3-week clinical coaching at health facilities. Thereafter, community health extension workers and health managers provided supportive supervision over a six-month period. Skills were assessed before the six-day training, during coaching, and after six months of iCCM implementation. Results: CHVs knowledge assessment scores improved from 54.5% to 72.9% after the six-day training (p < 0.001). All 58 CHVs could assess and classify fever and diarrhoea correctly after 3–6 weeks of facility-based clinical coaching; 97% could correctly identify malnutrition and 80%, suspected pneumonia. The majority correctly performed four of the six steps in malaria rapid diagnostic testing. However, only 58% could draw blood correctly and 67% dispose of waste correctly after the testing. The proportion of CHV exhibiting appropriate skills to examine for signs of illness improved from 4% at baseline to 74% after 6 months of iCCM implementation, p < 0.05. The proportion of caregivers in intervention community units who first sought treatment from a CHV increased from 2 to 31 percent (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Training and clinical coaching built CHV’s skills to manage common childhood illnesses. The CHVs demonstrated ability to follow the Kenya iCCM algorithm for decision-making on whether to treat or refer a sick child. The communities’ confidence in CHVs’ ability to deliver integrated case management resulted in modification of care-seeking behaviour

Misdiagnosis of HIV treatment failure based on clinical and immunological criteria in Eastern and Central Kenya

Abstract Background Routine laboratory monitoring is part of the basic care package offered to people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLHIV). This paper aims to identify the proportion of PLHIVs with clinical and immunological failure who are virologically suppressed and risk being misclassified as treatment failures. Methods A retrospective analysis of patient viral load data collected between January 2013 and June 2014 was conducted. Of the patients classified as experiencing either clinical or immunological failure, we evaluated the proportion of true (virological) failure, and estimated the sensitivity and specificity of the immunological and clinical criteria in diagnosing true treatment failure. Results Of the 27,418 PLHIVs aged 2–80 years on ART in the study period, 6.8% (n = 1859) were suspected of treatment failure and their viral loads analysed. 40% (n = 737) demonstrated viral suppression (VL < 1000 copies/ml). The median viral load (VL) was 3317 copies/ml (IQR 0–47,547). Among the 799 (2.9%) PLHIVs on ART classified as having clinical failure, 41.1% (n = 328) of them had confirmed viral suppression. Of the 463 (1.7%) classified as having immunological failure, 36.9% (n = 171) had confirmed viral suppression. The sensitivity of the clinical criteria in diagnosing true failure was 61% (CI 58%–65%) while that of the immunological criteria 38% (CI 35%–42%). The specificity of the clinical criteria was 34% (CI 30%–39%) while that of the immunological criteria 66% (61%–70%). Age below 20 years was associated with a high viral load (p < .001). Sex and ART regimen were not associated with the viral load. Conclusion Clinical and immunological criteria alone are not sufficient to identify true treatment failure. There is need for accurate treatment failure diagnosis through viral load testing to avoid incorrect early or delayed switching of patients to second-line regimens. This study recommends increased viral load testing in line with the Kenya’s ART guidelines