Wall-resolved versus wall-modeled LES of the flow field and surface forced convective heat transfer for a low-rise building

Large eddy simulation (LES) is widely used to investigate the aerodynamics and convective heat transfer (CHT) at the surfaces of sharp-edged bluff bodies for a wide range of Reynolds (Re) numbers. Due to the heavy computational costs associated with implicit filtering in LES at high Reynolds number flows (Re ≥ 105), wall-modeled (WM) rather than wall-resolved (WR) LES is often adopted. However, the performance of LES-WM for such applications has not yet been systematically investigated. Therefore, this study evaluates the performance of LES-WM and LES-WR for the flow and thermal field at the facades of a low-rise building immersed in an atmospheric boundary layer. Four grids are constructed for LES-WM, each employing different resolution at the building surfaces reaching maximum non-dimensional wall distance y+ = 43, 57, 70, and 95. In addition, the performance of two wall functions, namely the Werner and Wengle and the enhanced wall function is investigated. The results show that the use of LES-WM can result in significant deviations in the predicted near-facade flow pattern and the surface convective heat transfer coefficient (CHTC). Grid resolution significantly impacts the CHTC results and deviations go up to 88% (at the base of the windward facade). Considerable deviations among the employed wall functions are apparent only on the finest grid. In this case, the implementation of the enhanced wall function indicates better performance compared to the non-blended law of the wall (combined with the Werner and Wengle) for CHTC in the regions of the leeward facade where the flow remains attached to the wall. The deviation of the enhanced wall function for surface-averaged CHTC is found to be 10.8% against the wall-resolved LES results, while for the non-blended law of the wall this is 19.2%.</p

On the use of non-conformal grids for economic LES of wind flow and convective heat transfer for a wall-mounted cube

Generating economical, high-resolution and high-quality computational grids for Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of wind flow and convective heat transfer (CHT) around surface-mounted obstacles is not straightforward. When the grid size is used as filter, LES grids should ideally consist of cubic cells, while CHT requires a very high near-wall resolution to resolve the thin viscous sublayer and buffer layer that represent the largest resistance to CHT. To avoid very high cell numbers and the need for excessive computational resources, non-conformal grids can be considered. This paper provides a detailed evaluation of the performance of non-conformal grids with cubic cells, for wind flow and CHT around a wall-mounted cubic obstacle. LES results on non-conformal versus conformal grids are compared with each other and with wind-tunnel measurements of wind speed and surface temperature. Moreover, sensitivity analysis is performed concerning the impact of overall grid resolution, subdomain size and grid refinement ratio. Average absolute deviations between LES on non-conformal versus conformal grids are about 0.9% (0.5 °C) for surface temperature on all cube surfaces. Comparison with experiments shows for the non-conformal grid an average and maximum absolute deviation for surface temperature of 2.0% (1.1 °C) and 7.6% (3.6 °C), respectively. The sensitivity analysis shows minor impact of subdomain size on convective heat transfer coefficients (CHTC) where, on average, absolute deviations of less than 2.2% are observed. This study shows that non-conformal grids can strongly reduce the total cell count (here by a factor up to 30.2) without significantly compromising the accuracy of results

On the use of non-conformal grids for economic LES of wind flow and convective heat transfer for a wall-mounted cube

\u3cp\u3eGenerating economical, high-resolution and high-quality computational grids for Large Eddy Simulation (LES) of wind flow and convective heat transfer (CHT) around surface-mounted obstacles is not straightforward. When the grid size is used as filter, LES grids should ideally consist of cubic cells, while CHT requires a very high near-wall resolution to resolve the thin viscous sublayer and buffer layer that represent the largest resistance to CHT. To avoid very high cell numbers and the need for excessive computational resources, non-conformal grids can be considered. This paper provides a detailed evaluation of the performance of non-conformal grids with cubic cells, for wind flow and CHT around a wall-mounted cubic obstacle. LES results on non-conformal versus conformal grids are compared with each other and with wind-tunnel measurements of wind speed and surface temperature. Moreover, sensitivity analysis is performed concerning the impact of overall grid resolution, subdomain size and grid refinement ratio. Average absolute deviations between LES on non-conformal versus conformal grids are about 0.9% (0.5 °C) for surface temperature on all cube surfaces. Comparison with experiments shows for the non-conformal grid an average and maximum absolute deviation for surface temperature of 2.0% (1.1 °C) and 7.6% (3.6 °C), respectively. The sensitivity analysis shows minor impact of subdomain size on convective heat transfer coefficients (CHTC) where, on average, absolute deviations of less than 2.2% are observed. This study shows that non-conformal grids can strongly reduce the total cell count (here by a factor up to 30.2) without significantly compromising the accuracy of results.\u3c/p\u3

Impact of exterior convective heat transfer coefficient models on the energy demand prediction of buildings with different geometry

Accurate models for exterior convective heat transfer coefficients (CHTC) are important for predicting building energy demand. A detailed review of the literature indicates that existing CHTC models take into account the impact of building geometry either incompletely, or not at all. To the best of our knowledge, research on the impact of exterior CHTC models on the predicted energy performance of buildings with different geometry has not yet been performed. This paper, therefore, investigates the influence of CHTC models on the calculated energy demand of buildings with varying geometry. Building energy simulations are performed for three groups: buildings with Hb (building height) &gt; Wb (building width), buildings with Hb &lt; Wb and buildings with Hb = Wb. Six commonly used CHTC models and a new generalized CHTC model are considered. The generalized CHTC model is expressed as a function of Hb and Wb. The simulations are performed for low and high thermal resistances of the building envelope. The results show that the different CHTC models provide significantly different predictions for the building energy demand. While for annual heating demand, deviations of −14.5% are found, for the annual cooling demand a maximum deviation of +42.0% is obtained, compared to the generalized CHTC model. This study underlines the need for the CHTC models to consider building geometry in their expressions, especially for high-rise buildings. For low-rise builgings, the observed deviations between the existing and the generalized CHTC model are less pronounced